Subjective thoughts on rolling resistance

Questions about purchasing bicycles and parts

Subjective thoughts on rolling resistance

Postby LuckyPierre » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:58 am

I know that there's been threads about tyres, but this one could (and I emphasise 'could') be different.
Mike has an interesting link in his signature which has a pretty objective analysis of rolling resistance for a range of tyres.
My first thought was "Beauty, both the tyres I use (Open Corsa Evo CX and Pro2Race) are up near the top of the table". Then I thought "Hang on, the Attack / Force pair are way down the bottom". All in all, there's plenty of room for some subjective thoughts, aren't there?
I'll go first.
While I'm pleased to see my two preferred tyres scoring well, I think that there is a pretty big difference in how they feel. The Evo's seem easier to push (and are measurably so accordng to the chart), but the Pro2Race's seem to ride better. Interestingly, the article rated the Pro2Race's as more puncture resistant than the Evo's, but my experience is very much the opposite - after all, I replaced the Michelins because I was sick of punctures and I've only had one with my Vittorias. I hope that that doesn't condemn me to another round of frequent punctures! :?
User avatar
LuckyPierre
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

by BNA » Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:06 pm

BNA
 

Postby sogood » Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:06 pm

Can't comment. They don't have Conti GP4000.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16796
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Postby MichaelB » Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:35 pm

Which Mike where ? The link you provided doesn't work ?

Is there a comparison of what the cost vs rolling resistance ?
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6824
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:29 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby LuckyPierre » Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:30 pm

MichaelB wrote: Which Mike where ?
'mikesbytes' Mike - in his signature
MichaelB wrote:The link you provided doesn't work ?
It does for me (both here and in Mike's signature). Did you click on it? :wink:
MichaelB wrote:Is there a comparison of what the cost vs rolling resistance ?
No. But you can cost the different tyres pretty easily (ProBikeKit carries nearly all of them).
Last edited by LuckyPierre on Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LuckyPierre
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

Postby DrEvil123 » Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:37 pm

Yeah the link is fine :)
User avatar
DrEvil123
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:08 am

Postby MichaelB » Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:41 pm

Doesn't work for me :cry:
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6824
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:29 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby europa » Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:48 pm

MichaelB wrote:Doesn't work for me :cry:


Maybe you're too big for effective rolling resistance :roll: :D

Peter's link at the top of this thread worked for me, I haven't clicked on the one in Mike's signature, just assumed they were the same.

Maybe I'm tired but I didn't really get much from that article and it seemed to be suggesting that fatter is better.

Richard
User avatar
europa
 
Posts: 7327
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby MichaelB » Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:50 pm

I can't even see the link in mikesbytes signature that you are referring to !!!!

I can see the links in red for the Frame Size calc & Parks Tool Repair guide, and his Training Log ibn blue, but that's it.

I am obviously not meant to see it, as it might give me ideas that I can't fathom at the moment......
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6824
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:29 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby mikesbytes » Wed Apr 18, 2007 6:08 pm

MichaelB wrote:I can't even see the link in mikesbytes signature that you are referring to !!!!


Burn plenty of Glycogen
Frame Size Calculator.....Park Tools Repair Guides Frame Size Calculator.....Rolling Resistance.....Rolling Performance
ImageImageImage
training log
A helmet saved my life
User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 14535
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney

Postby 531db » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:19 pm

Europa wrote:

'fatter is better'

Absolutely, 531db agrees with this.

The Fellini and Superlite both use Maxxis Detonator tyres in 700 x 28C. These tyres are the same flexible lightweight tyres as the 700 x 23C versions, just wider and taller and have a recommended max pressure of 120 psi.

531db has proven these work with 2 wins, and a number of placings in ACTVCC and Waratah VCC events, and to top it off a second place in a NSW state open road race all on 28C's

'Steel is real'
'Fatter is faster'
'Shifters belong on the downtube'
'Less Gears - More Beers'
'The Sturmenator is coming'
531db
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:25 pm
Location: Riding a real steel bike - somewhere!

Postby Mulger bill » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:13 pm

531db wrote:The Fellini and Superlite both use Maxxis Detonator tyres in 700 x 28C. These tyres are the same flexible lightweight tyres as the 700 x 23C versions, just wider and taller and have a recommended max pressure of 120 psi.


Is there much of a weight penalty in the X28c tyres 531?

Shaun
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25270
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Postby 531db » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:25 pm

Mulger bill wrote:

"Is there much of a weight penalty in the X28c tyres 531?"

Very little, there would be a small amount, but it's not obvious to me. I believe the 28C Detonators would be lighter then many 23C's, especially the kevlar belted jobbies.

BTW, the tyres are mounted on Mavic Open Pro or MA2 rims.

A good honest 36 DT SS spokes in the rear and either 28 or 36 in the front depending on the wheel being used.
531db
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:25 pm
Location: Riding a real steel bike - somewhere!

Postby Mulger bill » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:44 pm

Thanks 531, I'll look them up when the current ones die.
Would there be any fitting issues on Shimano R500 wheels?

Shaun
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25270
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Postby MichaelB » Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:48 am

I can see and access the Rolling performance link, and see the Rolling restance, but can't get it up.

The interesting thing is the grip level as well.

There is a pair of Schwalbe Ultremo clinchers for $100 on Ebay at the moment as well !! And the same seller has a pair of Conti GP4000S as well.
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6824
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:29 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby Halfanewb » Sat Apr 21, 2007 4:49 pm

Got my first ride on the new conti gp4000's today, at first i thought i didn't have them up to the right pressure and had to check to make sure, on the old tires i could tell when i had to pump them back up over the 100psi because the ride became soft and i couldn't feel every grain of the road surface.

the ride the bike has now is so smoooth and soft! At first i thought there would be a performance trade off in cornering grip but the tires are very surefooted around corners, chalk and cheese compared to the stock set of maxxis slicks the bike came with.

:D /big silly grin
Halfanewb
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Buying a bike / parts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 49Vanguard, Ersko



Support BNA
Click for online shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Cycling Express Cycling Express
Ebay Ebay AU
ProBikeKit ProBikeKit UK
Evans Cycles Evans Cycles UK
JensonUSA Jenson USA
JensonUSA Competitive Cyclist