Powertap C1 Opinions
- stevecassidy
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:42 pm
- Location: Telopea, Sydney
- Contact:
Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby stevecassidy » Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:14 pm
Does anyone have first hand experience with the C1? Any information is welcome.
Steve
- stevecassidy
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:42 pm
- Location: Telopea, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby stevecassidy » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:22 pm
The C1 requires a 110mm BCD crank to fit to and since I have a regular Ultegra 6700 group I needed a replacement crank. I picked up a cheap 105 5750 crank for $121 thinking that the weight difference with Ultegra was not likely to be too much. I weighed everything as I switched it over and interestingly found that the left crank arm on both groupsets was identical in weight at 198g. The right side showed some differences with 6700 coming in at 509g with rings while the 5750 was 528g, so I'm gaining around 20g with the 105 option (but saving around $80).
With the C1 chainrings fitted the right side crank weighs in at 694g so an extra 166g over the regular rings and 185g for me over my Ultegra 6700 groupset.
I had a ride this morning on the trainer. The C1 paired first time with my Garmin 500 and prompted me to calibrate. I got the kind of power readings I expected, I'm not very fit at the moment but did most of a Sufferfest video managing about 230w for the 'tempo' sections. It will be good to look at the numbers as I gather more data and begin to learn about training and riding with power.
Steve
-
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:28 am
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby dalai47 » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:25 pm
- stevecassidy
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:42 pm
- Location: Telopea, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby stevecassidy » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:53 pm
After riding on Friday I gave the bike a wash. On Saturday I was getting nonsense power readings from the C1. I tried a calibration and it gave me "Calibration Failed". When I got home I tried a new battery to no avail.
I've reported this to Powertap and had an email response in reasonable time with some suggestions. They didn't work so I'm now waiting on their response. Probikekit have also responded saying that they'll handle it as a warranty claim if needs be. So at least I'm getting responsive service from both.
Will post with more detail when this gets resolved.
Steve
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:33 am
- stevecassidy
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:42 pm
- Location: Telopea, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby stevecassidy » Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:15 am
All the balance numbers I've looked at show I have no significant imbalance - everything hovers around 50%. So that has gone out of the window as something to worry about.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Good luck with it. Just don't go making training interventions based on the pseudo-power balance data.
Steve
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:27 am
They show a pseudo-balance which hovers around 50:50, which tells you very little about your actual pedal balance or the manner in which that pseudo-balanced was achieved.stevecassidy wrote:All the balance numbers I've looked at show I have no significant imbalance - everything hovers around 50%. So that has gone out of the window as something to worry about.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Good luck with it. Just don't go making training interventions based on the pseudo-power balance data.
Steve
To explain with an example, these pseudo-balance measurements (also on Power2Max and Quarq) cannot tell the difference between these pedal force scenarios for say the left downstroke portion of the crank revolution:
110L : -10R
100L : 0R
90L : +10R
since they can only report the net value from both cranks, even though these represent quite different pedalling force scenarios.
It's entirely possible that a pseudo-balance meter can report you to be right side dominant, while at the same time a power meter measuring each crank (or pedal) independently reports you as left side dominant.
Even if it showed a pseudo-imbalance that hovered around 47:53, what then?
It's just not actionable intelligence. Asymmetry is normal and variable asymmetry is normal. That wouldn't be something to worry about either.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby Comedian » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:48 pm
I have vectors which are true double sided. They show a slight imbalance for me at high power outputs. I'm really not sure what can be done? What options are there?Alex Simmons/RST wrote:They show a pseudo-balance which hovers around 50:50, which tells you very little about your actual pedal balance or the manner in which that pseudo-balanced was achieved.stevecassidy wrote:All the balance numbers I've looked at show I have no significant imbalance - everything hovers around 50%. So that has gone out of the window as something to worry about.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Good luck with it. Just don't go making training interventions based on the pseudo-power balance data.
Steve
To explain with an example, these pseudo-balance measurements (also on Power2Max and Quarq) cannot tell the difference between these pedal force scenarios for say the left downstroke portion of the crank revolution:
110L : -10R
100L : 0R
90L : +10R
since they can only report the net value from both cranks, even though these represent quite different pedalling force scenarios.
It's entirely possible that a pseudo-balance meter can report you to be right side dominant, while at the same time a power meter measuring each crank (or pedal) independently reports you as left side dominant.
Even if it showed a pseudo-imbalance that hovered around 47:53, what then?
It's just not actionable intelligence. Asymmetry is normal and variable asymmetry is normal. That wouldn't be something to worry about either.
And re the C1... I hope to learn more about this as I reckon they are a great idea. Powertap hubs are virtually bulletproof so I'm pretty interested.
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14752
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby MichaelB » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:56 pm
Shortened for brevity.Alex Simmons/RST wrote: ...Even if it showed a pseudo-imbalance that hovered around 47:53, what then?
It's just not actionable intelligence. Asymmetry is normal and variable asymmetry is normal. That wouldn't be something to worry about either.
I love Alex's comments arouynd power meters and the reality behind them. It does make my head hurt sometimes in trying to understand the details, but one thing really stands out for me though.
Unless you are going to use the data properly (analyse and react to), they are nothing more than a toy which can decarease your enjoyment of cycling
Therefore, I'm saving my money for the next bike or trip OS
-
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 11:05 pm
- Location: West Gippy
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby macca33 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 5:13 pm
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Apr 27, 2017 5:36 pm
Are you asking how to test the validity of the data, or whether your pedalling data suggests an intervention is something worth considering?Comedian wrote:I have vectors which are true double sided. They show a slight imbalance for me at high power outputs. I'm really not sure what can be done? What options are there?
As I said before, asymmetry is both normal, as is variable asymmetry. Attaining symmetry isn't the aim, improving performance is. There's nothing really to suggest one is related to the other.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Apr 27, 2017 5:38 pm
Which I suppose is why Powertap offer options for pedals, chainring and hub based power meters, since no one system is perfect for every use case.macca33 wrote:The only off-putting aspect for mine, is the limited compatibility of the C1 system - very limited....
- foo on patrol
- Posts: 8987
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:12 am
- Location: Sanstone Point QLD
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby foo on patrol » Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:44 pm
Foo
Goal 6000km
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:06 am
Model no longer serviced AFAIK but check with Powertap as they do (or did) offer an upgrade program for those with older model units. No idea if it's available here in Australia though.foo on patrol wrote:I just wish that I could find someone to give my Powertap wheel to, because it's not talking to the head unit. It's one of the first Cyclopes ones, so has a cable from the sensor to the head unit.
Foo
https://www.powertap.com/post/blog-why- ... -gen-2-hub
- foo on patrol
- Posts: 8987
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:12 am
- Location: Sanstone Point QLD
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby foo on patrol » Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:06 am
Foo
Goal 6000km
- stevecassidy
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 10:42 pm
- Location: Telopea, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Powertap C1 Opinions
Postby stevecassidy » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:51 pm
Anyway, back to riding with power on a new device. Fingers crossed that this one lasts a bit longer.
Steve
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.