I ride Parisburger wrote: Maybe that Pinarello is named after a Hilton . . .
*sorry*
Oops, I mean a Paris
Postby richbee » Thu Dec 12, 2013 12:01 am
I ride Parisburger wrote: Maybe that Pinarello is named after a Hilton . . .
*sorry*
Postby Baldy » Thu Dec 12, 2013 12:17 am
Postby kx315 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 12:58 pm
Postby Tank1252 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 1:01 pm
Postby jasonc » Thu Dec 12, 2013 1:01 pm
The patent owner isn't the one trying to do a smackdown.Baldy wrote:But when it turns out someone else owns it, not a peep. Well if there was a peep you could not hear it over the backslapping.
Postby djw47 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:43 pm
Postby RonK » Thu Dec 12, 2013 4:11 pm
Fairness to Specialized? It doesn't matter who did it, even if it was the janitor. It's still Specialized bullying a small business which is clearly not selling counterfeit or deliberately misleading products, and is using a trademark for which Specialized doesn't have the rights.djw47 wrote:In fairness to Specialized, chances are this would have been done by a legal team that is paid to look out for potential breaches of copyright and go in heavy to scare the real copyright breachers - ie the guys selling counterfeit goods or deliberately misleading products that trade off the confusion between cheap rip offs and Specialized's brand reputation.
Postby The 2nd Womble » Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:11 pm
The company has a long litigious history and many alrready knew it before this. If not for the worldwide social media frenzy and ASI's position there is no doubt in my mind that Specialized would have pursued this further.Baldy wrote:You can imagine me wearing a cool T-shirt while you read this if you like.
More than a few people have been questioning Specialized right to patent a place name. But when it turns out someone else owns it, not a peep. Well if there was a peep you could not hear it over the backslapping.
Some people are talking like Specialized is a LBS. Calling for worldwide boycott of the entire brand just seems vindictive. I wonder if whoever hatched this genius plan to begin with ran it past Spec-Australia? Its not like they contacted all staff and contractors worldwide and a majority vote said yep, lets shaft this guy. Heads should indeed roll. I don't think we need to nuke the whole town but just get rid of the dead wood that is poisoning the water.
Storm in a social media teacup.
Postby cobba » Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:50 pm
Postby Mulger bill » Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:35 pm
Must be easy to shoot themself in the foot when their shysters wear clownshoes...cobba wrote:Another company gets a letter from Specialized: https://www.facebook.com/epixgear/posts ... 763882505#
Postby The 2nd Womble » Thu Dec 12, 2013 11:54 pm
Postby hiflange » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:13 am
Postby find_bruce » Fri Dec 13, 2013 7:48 am
You're just meanThe 2nd Womble wrote:They need less lawyers on their payroll and alot more cyclists. And no, lawyers who ride don't count.
Postby The 2nd Womble » Fri Dec 13, 2013 11:24 am
Roflfind_bruce wrote:You're just meanThe 2nd Womble wrote:They need less lawyers on their payroll and alot more cyclists. And no, lawyers who ride don't count.
Postby Baalzamon » Fri Dec 13, 2013 11:57 am
Postby skull » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:34 pm
So on the page there is a number of requests for epix to post the letter. Yet conveniently it has not been.Baalzamon wrote:Epic vs Epix hmmm
What is in a letter hey
Those lawyer clowns are doing a heap of damage to specialized and I wonder if they know it
Postby kx315 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:41 pm
Exactly my thoughts also........will watch with interest!skull wrote:So on the page there is a number of requests for epix to post the letter. Yet conveniently it has not been.Baalzamon wrote:Epic vs Epix hmmm
What is in a letter hey
Those lawyer clowns are doing a heap of damage to specialized and I wonder if they know it
Call me skeptical but I think this is a sham
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Postby Baalzamon » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:44 pm
yes it was posted, I read itskull wrote:So on the page there is a number of requests for epix to post the letter. Yet conveniently it has not been.Baalzamon wrote:Epic vs Epix hmmm
What is in a letter hey
Those lawyer clowns are doing a heap of damage to specialized and I wonder if they know it
Call me skeptical but I think this is a sham
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Postby kx315 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:50 pm
Postby Mulger bill » Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:02 pm
I might be being nasty to our resident legal practioners (*waves*) here, but do you think they give much of a damn as long as the paycheque is there?Baalzamon wrote:Those lawyer clowns are doing a heap of damage to specialized and I wonder if they know it
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Thoglette
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.