Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15592
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby AUbicycles » Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:53 am
I am guessing that Armstrong is cashing up somehow as it seems a logical explanation why each truth is a part truth and there are 50 installments still to come.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby sogood » Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:24 am
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby biker jk » Tue Nov 19, 2013 11:58 am
I'd suggest LA won't reveal all unless he has his lifetime ban reduced. He's also facing numerous lawsuits and will need to testify under oath soon, so perhaps a little blame sharing for now.AUbicycles wrote:Does that mean Lance Armstrong lied? Tell me it's not true.
I am guessing that Armstrong is cashing up somehow as it seems a logical explanation why each truth is a part truth and there are 50 installments still to come.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10615
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby find_bruce » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:37 pm
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15592
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby AUbicycles » Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:54 pm
I have read up (sept 2013) that there are five lawsuits for fraud and Armstrong had a recent victory:
USA Today wrote:Armstrong's biggest legal victory so far this year happened earlier this month when a federal judge in Sacramento ruled that the First Amendment protected Armstrong's right to lie about doping in his autobiographies. The ruling gutted a potential class-action suit filed against him January by readers who claimed they were defrauded by the falsehoods in his books. They had sought more than $5 million in damages.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby sogood » Tue Nov 19, 2013 10:55 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10615
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby find_bruce » Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:46 pm
- singlespeedscott
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
- Location: Elimbah, Queensland
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby singlespeedscott » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:44 pm
Good thing too. What an idiot.find_bruce wrote:Di-Luca banned for life I was going to say that it is all a bit unnecessary as no team would be stupid enough to hire him, but vini fantini has already proved that isn't true
- ldrcycles
- Posts: 9594
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Kin Kin, Queensland
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby ldrcycles » Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:12 pm
+1. Interesting to see what the fallout will be for his bike brand.singlespeedscott wrote:Good thing too. What an idiot.find_bruce wrote:Di-Luca banned for life I was going to say that it is all a bit unnecessary as no team would be stupid enough to hire him, but vini fantini has already proved that isn't true
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby sogood » Sat Dec 07, 2013 10:26 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby biker jk » Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:38 pm
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/volta-a ... s-positive
In other news Froome is now free of bilharzia.
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Flagstaff Hill, Adelaide SA 5159
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby Dr_Mutley » Sun Dec 15, 2013 6:05 pm
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby biker jk » Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:59 am
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci-ope ... rnan-locke
- philip
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
- Chuck
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:19 pm
- Location: Hiding in the bunch
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby Chuck » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:44 am
I wonder if the discussion on here about this will get as interesting as the Contador thread
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby brentono » Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:12 am
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby biker jk » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:55 pm
I'm sure Rogers will claim food contamination from eating in China. However, it is well know that Chinese beef is tainted and many teams bring their own food or eat chicken and/or fish. So it's not clear Rogers will get off so easily.brentono wrote:Unlucky Dodger, and another reason for tolerance threshold levels for Clenbuterol.
- singlespeedscott
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
- Location: Elimbah, Queensland
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby singlespeedscott » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:21 pm
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby brentono » Fri Dec 20, 2013 9:53 am
True, as with Alberto, the onus of proof is on the accused, and he may not be successful (unlikely)biker jk wrote:I'm sure Rogers will claim food contamination from eating in China. However, it is well know that Chinese beef is tainted and many teams bring their own food or eat chicken and/or fish. So it's not clear Rogers will get off so easily.brentono wrote:Unlucky Dodger, and another reason for tolerance threshold levels for Clenbuterol.
Will be more reason for the consideration of threshold levels for Clenbuterol.
- Chuck
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:19 pm
- Location: Hiding in the bunch
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby Chuck » Fri Dec 20, 2013 10:16 am
Because clenbuterol positives have reached epidemic levels.brentono wrote:True, as with Alberto, the onus of proof is on the accused, and he may not be successful (unlikely)biker jk wrote:I'm sure Rogers will claim food contamination from eating in China. However, it is well know that Chinese beef is tainted and many teams bring their own food or eat chicken and/or fish. So it's not clear Rogers will get off so easily.brentono wrote:Unlucky Dodger, and another reason for tolerance threshold levels for Clenbuterol.
Will be more reason for the consideration of threshold levels for Clenbuterol.
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby brentono » Fri Dec 20, 2013 11:23 am
Maybe more (in many sports)than your aware of Chuck, and maybe "threshold levels" should be appliedChuck wrote:Because clenbuterol positives have reached epidemic levels.brentono wrote:
True, as with Alberto, the onus of proof is on the accused, and he may not be successful (unlikely)
Will be more reason for the consideration of threshold levels for Clenbuterol.
to all banned substances, but I feel the WADA may take the easy way out,
as it would be a mammoth task
From WADA site, as they have conceeded...
It is possible that under certain circumstance the presence of a low level of clenbuterol
in an athlete sample can be the result of food contamination.
- schroeds
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby schroeds » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:05 pm
I spose it's possible but I wouldn't be putting any bets on it
Why would it be a mammoth task to add a threshold level of Clenbuterol?
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby sogood » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:19 pm
As for all scientific procedures, threshold has necessarily be based on certain criteria, and it's never an all or none event. As such, the application of a threshold would just let through dopers who use micro-dosing strategies without completely resolving false positives.schroeds wrote:Can't see how they could bust Conty and not Dodger unless he had photos of buying and eating beef, they track it down to a supplier test their products and find the substance...
I spose it's possible but I wouldn't be putting any bets on it
Why would it be a mammoth task to add a threshold level of Clenbuterol?
At the end of the day, they are pros and making bucks as well as being supported by teams of experts. Not as if they don't know which regions in the world have clenbuterol and other contamination issues and they'd be well advised on the proper precautions. So it comes down to two possibilities, 1) Unintentional ingestion due to poor self-control. 2) Intentional use. In any case, where are the others of the 150+ riders who were also contaminated from that tour? What has Rogers been eating and where did he eat alone?
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby RonK » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:29 pm
Quite simply, because there are only two places in the world where clenbuterol is used in livestock. Spain is not one of them, nor France. But China is, and Mexico is the other.schroeds wrote:Can't see how they could bust Conty and not Dodger unless he had photos of buying and eating beef, they track it down to a supplier test their products and find the substance...
I spose it's possible but I wouldn't be putting any bets on it
Why would it be a mammoth task to add a threshold level of Clenbuterol?
In past cases, WADA has declined to defend appeals to the CAS by athletes who returned positive tests for Clenbuterol after competing in these two countries.
But return a positive test in any other country and you are a drug cheat.
I suspect that if the positive test is confirmed, WADA will have little choice but to find Rogers guilty, however it would very likely be overturned on appeal.
- Chuck
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:19 pm
- Location: Hiding in the bunch
Re: Crapola!!!....P.E.D's in Cycling
Postby Chuck » Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:46 pm
Your opinion and you're entitled Personally I'd rather not offer cheats a leg up by supplying a ready made loophole. As sogood has said these are pro athletes on pro teams, they have the resources to avoid situations like this. I believe they also had a heads up from the UCI about possible beef contamination in China. The TOB has been going three years now and there hasn't, to my knowledge, been a spate of clen positives. Rogers may fight this but I don't see how he can win.brentono wrote: Maybe more (in many sports)than your aware of Chuck, and maybe "threshold levels" should be applied
to all banned substances
Return to “International and National Tours and Events”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.