Hi guys!
i recently bought a Salsa Fargo for my touring adventure in Australia. i will start in few days, riding from SYD to MEL, but i want to replace the tyres, 'cause they are too wide.
I'll choose something that could allow me to do road and some off road in Tasmania next month. My concern is: should i do tubeless or with tube?
What experience and recommendations do you have?
Grazie
Matteo
Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 3:54 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby il padrone » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:49 pm
How wide is "too wide"?
Everyone I know in the touring world uses tubes. Realistically, for security you're going to beed to carry spare tubes, even with tubeless. I see minimal advantage for a loaded cycletour.
Everyone I know in the touring world uses tubes. Realistically, for security you're going to beed to carry spare tubes, even with tubeless. I see minimal advantage for a loaded cycletour.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 3:54 am
- Location: Italy
- Contact:
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby obikiller » Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:47 pm
It's a 29x2.0. quite big
i saw the scwhalbe hurricane, they look good, did you try those ones?
i saw the scwhalbe hurricane, they look good, did you try those ones?
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby il padrone » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:57 pm
No, never used them. That type of tyre is a fairly poor perfomer on tarmac - the side knobs reduce your traction in turns, just where you need the traction.
For touring use I can recommend the Schwalbe Marathon Mondial as a truly tough, long-lasting tyre. Also the Vittoria Randonneur Cross - my top tyre for puncture protection and wear. Marathon Supremes are allegedly also very good, a lighter tyre but still very good life and puncture resistance.
For touring use I can recommend the Schwalbe Marathon Mondial as a truly tough, long-lasting tyre. Also the Vittoria Randonneur Cross - my top tyre for puncture protection and wear. Marathon Supremes are allegedly also very good, a lighter tyre but still very good life and puncture resistance.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Warin
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:13 pm
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby Warin » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:12 am
Don't see mondials nor Supremes available in 29"? You may well be restricted in that size for touring tyres... at the moment.obikiller wrote:It's a 29x2.0. quite big
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby il padrone » Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:19 am
Marathon Mondial 29" - lots more at cheaper prices from overseas, like bike24, c r c, xxcyxles, Wiggle maybe, etc. And if you go for the Vittoria Randonneur Cross there is a much bigger range of widths in 700C.
29" = 700C
29" = 700C
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Warin
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:13 pm
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby Warin » Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:42 pm
Ok.. I've not made that translation. I call a spade a spade...il padrone wrote:29" = 700C
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Touring Australia. Tubeless or with tube?
Postby il padrone » Thu Dec 26, 2013 5:37 pm
Yeah, it's a pretty stupid and confusing bike trade misnomer, for what benefit to the consumer I have no idea in the slightest 29" is a crazy term to use as they are actually smaller than the old 27" size...... go figure ????
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
Return to “Touring Bikes and Equipment”
Jump to
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
Brought to you by Bicycles Network Australia | © 1999 - 2024 | Powered by phpBB ®
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.