Ugly Bikes

User avatar
Dragster1
Posts: 1540
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:46 pm
Location: Eluding motorist

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Dragster1 » Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:41 am

insightt47 wrote:
Jean wrote:A pretty ordinary looking bike made downright awful by a terrible colour. My stomach turns every time they show Radio Shack Leopard Trek rider at this year's TdF - and it's not because it's usually Andy Schelck in one of their see-through jerseys. I'm not sure I could even watch Jens ride :?

Image

That is the ugliest head tube i have ever seen. What were Trek thinking, the previous Madone had perfect asthetics.
Maybe they went with the aero dynamic look on the head tube and Pascal colours so 80s style

User avatar
rangersac
Posts: 1438
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:01 am
Location: Southern Tasmania

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby rangersac » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:12 pm

Useful for gay pride marches and more generally for making onlookers feel queasy

Image
De Rosa Macro | Intense Primer | Wayward Cape York | Cotic Rocket

jasonc
Posts: 12218
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:33 pm

^ or for the colour-blind society

insightt47
Posts: 449
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby insightt47 » Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:23 pm

rangersac wrote:Useful for gay pride marches and more generally for making onlookers feel queasy

Image
haha Say What

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Aushiker » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:25 am

Image

Andrew

briztoon
Posts: 1451
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby briztoon » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:55 am

rangersac wrote:Useful for gay pride marches and more generally for making onlookers feel queasy

Image
haha I love it. Is that wrong?

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:44 am

Aushiker wrote:Image

Andrew
Somebody, anybody tell me that that's a shoop.
Even if you're lying and it is real, I NEED to be told that it isn't...
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby rheicel » Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:01 pm

Cropped photo Shaun. Can see that at the bottom chain line.
Image

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Mulger bill » Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:13 pm

rheicel wrote:Cropped photo Shaun. Can see that at the bottom chain line.
Ahh, :D Thanks Rheicel, just spotted it. My eyes were too blurry from the horror to notice before.

Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Aushiker » Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:48 pm

Image

Andrew

User avatar
ldrcycles
Posts: 9594
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby ldrcycles » Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:52 pm

No no wrong thread!
"I must be rather keen on cycling"- Sir Hubert Opperman.

Road Record Association of Australia

User avatar
mitchy_
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 11:15 am
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby mitchy_ » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:04 pm

rheicel wrote:Cropped photo Shaun. Can see that at the bottom chain line.
that, and the front wheel is a super light weight zero spoke design! :shock:

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby rheicel » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:07 pm

mitchy_ wrote: that, and the front wheel is a super light weight zero spoke design! :shock:
I just noticed it now! Possibly using a magnetic field spoke there :-)
Image

User avatar
Dragster1
Posts: 1540
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:46 pm
Location: Eluding motorist

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Dragster1 » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:14 pm

rheicel wrote:
mitchy_ wrote: that, and the front wheel is a super light weight zero spoke design! :shock:
I just noticed it now! Possibly using a magnetic field spoke there :-)
New Brand of spokes you just cant see them yet :lol:

jasonc
Posts: 12218
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:21 pm

andrew - i agree with ldr - that look is nice to look at

southeastD
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:48 pm
Location: South East Melbourne

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby southeastD » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:36 pm

All in the eye of the beholder, but I find all Pinarello literally dog ugly, the wave forks and stays are hideous.


Image

User avatar
ldrcycles
Posts: 9594
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby ldrcycles » Sun Feb 02, 2014 5:34 pm

southeastD wrote:All in the eye of the beholder, but I find all Pinarello literally dog ugly, the wave forks and stays are hideous.


Image
+1, there's a right way to do wavy (ie Avanti from a year or two ago) and then there's the wrong way ^.
"I must be rather keen on cycling"- Sir Hubert Opperman.

Road Record Association of Australia

User avatar
Duck!
Expert
Posts: 9876
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: On The Tools

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Duck! » Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:23 pm

Dragster1 wrote: I am confused now, Why does the manufacturer say it is a TT with tri geometry

Featuring a stiff FACT monocoque frame engineered with Triathlon Geometry, the Transition Sport is a bona fide stopwatch slayer. With integrated aerodynamic brakes and a carbon bladed seatpost the Transition is the perfect time trialing weapon that won't break the bank.
Well the bike leg of a tri is basically a TT, so the bikes are conceptually similar. The fundamental difference though is that Tri bikes are not bound by UCI rules especially concerning aero tube profiles and seat nose/BB centre offset. Hence "Tri geometry". The rest is just mucketing guff.
I had a thought, but it got run over as it crossed my mind.

User avatar
Dragster1
Posts: 1540
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:46 pm
Location: Eluding motorist

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby Dragster1 » Sun Feb 02, 2014 10:28 pm

Duck! wrote:
Dragster1 wrote: I am confused now, Why does the manufacturer say it is a TT with tri geometry

Featuring a stiff FACT monocoque frame engineered with Triathlon Geometry, the Transition Sport is a bona fide stopwatch slayer. With integrated aerodynamic brakes and a carbon bladed seatpost the Transition is the perfect time trialing weapon that won't break the bank.
Well the bike leg of a tri is basically a TT, so the bikes are conceptually similar. The fundamental difference though is that Tri bikes are not bound by UCI rules especially concerning aero tube profiles and seat nose/BB centre offset. Hence "Tri geometry". The rest is just mucketing guff.
Thanks for clearing it up a bit, I'm not into my triathlons but I was always under the impression that the tri bike is more relaxed in frame geometry, In that the seat tube angle as it pushes your hips forward so that you don't load up your calf muscles as much as for the tt is a sprint to the end and it dosnt matter if you have spent all your energy and muscles up. I suppose you would ride what ever suits your style

jasonc
Posts: 12218
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Tue Feb 11, 2014 10:19 pm

this turned up in the facebook bicycle market

Image

User avatar
HLC
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:23 pm
Location: Sydney.

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby HLC » Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:48 pm

jasonc wrote:this turned up in the facebook bicycle market

Image
Wrong thread. This is gorgeous and if it was my size, it would be mine.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby trailgumby » Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:55 pm

Barf.

User avatar
HLC
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:23 pm
Location: Sydney.

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby HLC » Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:57 pm

mddawson wrote:
ldrcycles wrote:Good god, rod brakes and westwood rims on a newly manufactured machine :shock: . I'd be tempted if the quality wasn't so horrific.

Is something weird going on with the spoke lacing on those wheels, something doesn't look right to me?
They are only $262 with free shipping to Oz!

I am currently waiting on a fairly ugly $83 folding mountain bike I purchased on aliexpress and will report back on the quality, etc when it arrives:

Image
I need a link. For $83 I'm buying the family one each.

jasonc
Posts: 12218
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby jasonc » Tue Feb 18, 2014 8:44 am

HLC wrote:I need a link. For $83 I'm buying the family one each.
+1
for $83 i'll strip it

mddawson
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:05 pm

Re: Ugly Bikes

Postby mddawson » Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:42 pm

HLC wrote:
mddawson wrote:
ldrcycles wrote:Good god, rod brakes and westwood rims on a newly manufactured machine :shock: . I'd be tempted if the quality wasn't so horrific.

Is something weird going on with the spoke lacing on those wheels, something doesn't look right to me?
They are only $262 with free shipping to Oz!

I am currently waiting on a fairly ugly $83 folding mountain bike I purchased on aliexpress and will report back on the quality, etc when it arrives:

Image
I need a link. For $83 I'm buying the family one each.
Fake dealer unfortunately. Aliexpress refunded my money within a week and shut down that dealer.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jasonc, warthog1