I was thinking..
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:28 pm
I was thinking..
Postby thecaptn » Thu Mar 06, 2014 7:20 pm
Now I know that pinning anything on a driver is difficult due to our regestration system only able to identify a vehicals owner and not the vehicals driver and that's where I'm wondering if our cycling advocates have discussed pushing for a system where a drivers licence number is also displayed front and back on a car? Lets face it anyone can jump behind the wheel of a car be they licenced or not. A system where licences are displayed could promote more considered behaviour from those behind the wheel by taking some of the anonymity out of it and people may be more carefull about who they allow to access their cars
Of course legislation aimed at providing appropriate penalties to those drivers who kill or injure cyclists would be the last piece of the puzzle and maybe then drivers would have some real incentive to be carefull around vulnerable road users.
- Ross
- Posts: 5742
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby Ross » Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:05 pm
Having a "vigilante" type repoprting system where "victims" report incidents can be open to abuse. If I decide I don't like the bloke up the street for whatever reason I can record false incidents against him, and then him of me. There used to be a website "Rate My Plate" I think it was called where you could dob in moron motorists "blue Datsun rego XYZ123 ran a red light Beach Rd" but it got shut down, I think because of legal implications of false reports.
As for the licence of the driver being displayed on vehicles, that can be complicated when cars have regular different drivers, as families and work pool vehicles often do. So not sure how you would get around that.
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22387
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: I was thinking..
Postby Aushiker » Fri Mar 07, 2014 1:53 am
As far as I know unless I am being told a story, even the incidents I report that result in just a chat or a warning are formally recorded against the driver and are considered should a substantial incident arise. To me that is sufficient capturing of the data.Ross wrote:I would think there is already the facility in the police database to record "incidents" against drivers ....
That said I now keep a spreadsheet but that is for my own tracking purposes as often I need to bring up the details of past incidents (e.g., for a possible ABC 7:30 news story and the like).
Andrew
- Warin
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:13 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby Warin » Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:05 am
Red light and speed cameras identify the vehicle. The notice is sent out to the registered owner, who then identifies the driver ... that is the way the present system is supposed to work. Don't see why similar actions cannot take place for other offenses? Some of the cameras take the photos from the front .. so they might get a good shot of the driver to aid id.thecaptn wrote:Now I know that pinning anything on a driver is difficult due to our regestration system only able to identify a vehicals owner and not the vehicals driver and that's where I'm wondering if our cycling advocates have discussed pushing for a system where a drivers licence number is also displayed front and back on a car?
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby rkelsen » Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:39 am
Not sure about the legal side, but there certainly was a low signal to noise ratio on the site.Ross wrote:Having a "vigilante" type repoprting system where "victims" report incidents can be open to abuse. If I decide I don't like the bloke up the street for whatever reason I can record false incidents against him, and then him of me. There used to be a website "Rate My Plate" I think it was called where you could dob in moron motorists "blue Datsun rego XYZ123 ran a red light Beach Rd" but it got shut down, I think because of legal implications of false reports.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:28 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby thecaptn » Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:38 pm
I understand the limitations of a vigilante data data base but I also feel that a cycling group could better act on behalf of cyclists than the police because we care when a cyclist gets hit. As far as the system being open to abuse, yes I can see this but one person targeting one driver falsly should be easy to reveal and therefore irelevant, 10 unassociated people reporting one driver would be a patern.
Thanks for the feedback guys,
Pete
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: I was thinking..
Postby il padrone » Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:08 pm
So you reckon you want all drivers to mount/demount and carry with them their own portable licence platesthecaptn wrote:I'm thinking that licence numbers would need to be removeable and those responsable for them would keep them with them as far as would be practical.
Mate, that is the funniest joke I have heard in years about drivers and the Australian ID card Good luck with getting any traction with that one.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- chucknitro
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:30 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby chucknitro » Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:51 pm
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: I was thinking..
Postby Xplora » Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:12 am
- Ross
- Posts: 5742
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby Ross » Sat Mar 08, 2014 3:12 pm
People often don't display L or P plates or display them incorrectly (large number of driving school cars I see with presumably just the instructor driving and having L plates still displayed, P lates half hidden behind number plates) so getting people to display licence numbers would be hard work to say the least.thecaptn wrote:I'm thinking that licence numbers would need to be removeable and those responsable for them would keep them with them as far as would be practical. As far as the current system is concerned if someone is a crap driver and looses many or all of their points they can just get someone else to take the infringement for them but if their licence number was displayed, this strategy would no longer be an option because the traffic camera would register the driver of the vehical as opposed to the owner.
But you could get 10 cyclists from the same bunch or club all to falsely report a particular driver on differernt days and supposed locations. Or 10 Holden lovers falsely report some guy in a Ford on differernt days and supposed locations just because they don't like Fords. VIgilante type reporting just won't work.thecaptn wrote:I understand the limitations of a vigilante data data base but I also feel that a cycling group could better act on behalf of cyclists than the police because we care when a cyclist gets hit. As far as the system being open to abuse, yes I can see this but one person targeting one driver falsly should be easy to reveal and therefore irelevant, 10 unassociated people reporting one driver would be a patern.
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: I was thinking..
Postby Xplora » Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:51 pm
You could organise 10 people to make a formal but false report any crime (and scarily enough, if the police couldn't find any links between the 10, you'd probably get away with it) and get the same result. We already have vigilante reporting, the police simply require a formal report to ensure that they only get the seriously motivated.Ross wrote: But you could get 10 cyclists from the same bunch or club all to falsely report a particular driver on differernt days and supposed locations. Or 10 Holden lovers falsely report some guy in a Ford on differernt days and supposed locations just because they don't like Fords. VIgilante type reporting just won't work.
I personally am in favour of this kind of streamlined reporting. I'm not asking them to convict the driver of vehicular manslaughter, but simply to take it into account for any less serious offences. If someone has an unofficial record with the police for being aggressive and foulmouthed, they will treat that person differently.
If this makes the owner think twice about letting others drive their car, good. I wouldn't let someone drive my car if they were going to terrorise someone with it.
-
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:12 pm
- Location: Blackhead NSW
Re: I was thinking..
Postby brokenbus » Tue Mar 11, 2014 1:27 pm
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:28 pm
Re: I was thinking..
Postby thecaptn » Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:01 am
Yes it was a dumb idea.il padrone wrote:So you reckon you want all drivers to mount/demount and carry with them their own portable licence platesthecaptn wrote:I'm thinking that licence numbers would need to be removeable and those responsable for them would keep them with them as far as would be practical.
Mate, that is the funniest joke I have heard in years about drivers and the Australian ID card Good luck with getting any traction with that one.
- yugyug
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:27 am
- Location: Sydney
Re: I was thinking..
Postby yugyug » Sun Mar 16, 2014 12:28 pm
But THATS not a dumb idea - and I think you could argue that is what youtube already is. Trick would be getting police to use and treat it as such, and understanding digital time stamps and the like. Could be that a specialised version just for traffic offences which allows direct uploads but also pushes or pulls video to a youtube channel would work well. If it was was constructed in collaboration with the police, even better. Privacy settings could even be automatically implemented in various ways - for example, by number recognition software so that only registered users (e.g police administrators, insurers) would see number plates and they would be blurred for the rest.brokenbus wrote:How about a database where you have video evidence to back it up. Therefore no chance of false reporting. Make it available to the insurance companies so they adjust the premiums accordingly
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AdelaidePeter
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.