Knicks

open topic, for anything cycling related.

Knicks

Postby twowheels » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:20 pm

I've started to ride more now and have felt the need to wear knicks because I have heard they reduce chafing.
Before I rush out to buy them though I just wondered, are they worn with or without underwear? Also, are they effective if other shorts are worn over the top?
I ride a mountain bike and I've also heard about "shy shorts" or mountain bike shorts , are these basically a short with a knick inner?
twowheels
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:14 pm
Location: Perth

by BNA » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:33 pm

BNA
 

Postby leojvs » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:33 pm

I wear them (to look the part) because they are more comfy than just wearing normal shorts. I wear without grundies. They cause pain where the seams are. Give both a try. Its individual preferance.
Enjoy!!
oohhhh shiny new bike parts : -)
Image
User avatar
leojvs
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:30 am
Location: Warragamba, NSW. North of banjo county...

Postby sogood » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:40 pm

The purpose of cycling knicks is to avoid seams and pressure points where it can turn into sores on repeated rubbing. So it's best to wear them without underwears or you are defeating its purpose. Also, when you get the right size (nice and tight fit), there's no real room for undies.

However, you can wear underwear if you want and I have found it's not much of an issue when worn with looser fitting knicks for short ride. But for anything greater than 25-30km, I can definitely feel the difference. At 50km, you are likely to be sorry for wearing undies. :wink:
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16906
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Postby Bnej » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:06 pm

I have Netti Shy Shorts and Netti Twilight Nix. Both cost the same. ($80)

Shy shorts are more durable (nylon outer) and have pockets. The quality of the inner isn't that great and the seat pad is pretty low end. On a good MTB comfort saddle I find them fine.

Twilight Nix are Netti Pronix with reflective panels. They are more comfortable, esp on a road saddle, the pad is much better, prevents you from feeling damp and sweaty "there".

+1 Wear with no undies. Wash after each use.

Basically, if you want comfort and just comfort, you get more for your money in conventional bike shorts.

If you want mid-level comfort/style/durability bike clothes, ground effect Ranchsliders or Supertankers might be the way to go. You wear them with undies, but they have a thin pad-like thing to stop your legs from chafing. (groundeffect.co.nz) They also have neat zipped pockets, and a pump pocket, and microfibre lined knees.
User avatar
Bnej
 
Posts: 2880
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Katoomba, NSW

Postby mikesbytes » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:58 pm

A helmet saved my life
User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 14724
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney

Postby Mulger bill » Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:31 pm

Bnej wrote:If you want mid-level comfort/style/durability bike clothes, ground effect Ranchsliders or Supertankers might be the way to go. You wear them with undies, but they have a thin pad-like thing to stop your legs from chafing. (groundeffect.co.nz) They also have neat zipped pockets, and a pump pocket, and microfibre lined knees.


Second the motion, AND you can wear them anywhere without getting "those" looks from the uninitiated :)
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25554
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Postby LuckyPierre » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:17 pm

I wear these bibknicks from Uno. They might be twice as much as the Uno club knicks, but I think that they are worth it (besides, there are plenty of standard knicks that cost as much).
User avatar
LuckyPierre
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

Postby bigbuzz73 » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:00 pm

[quote="mikesbytes"]These shorts are a pretty good buy

I work a day or two a week at Cycling and Sports Clothing and agree with Mike. These knicks have exactly the same insert as the more expensive knicks, but miss out on the silicon leg grippers. If you have skinny thighs they tend to creep a bit, but are very good value.
Wayne
bigbuzz73
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:57 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby LuckyPierre » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:18 pm

bigbuzz73 wrote: ... These knicks have exactly the same insert as the more expensive knicks ...

I'm happy to be wrong, but ... the 'Ghia' bibknicks have an orange insert which is very different from the blue one in the 'Club' and 'Peleton' ones. Well, at least mine do. :?
User avatar
LuckyPierre
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

Postby bigbuzz73 » Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:53 pm

LuckyPierre wrote:
bigbuzz73 wrote: ... These knicks have exactly the same insert as the more expensive knicks ...

I'm happy to be wrong, but ... the 'Ghia' bibknicks have an orange insert which is very different from the blue one in the 'Club' and 'Peleton' ones. Well, at least mine do. :?

Sorry Lucky Pierre, you are absolutely correct. I didn't explain myself correctly. What I meant was that the cheaper 'Club' knicks (shorts) have the same insert as the more expensive 'Pro peleton' knicks (shorts).
The 'Ghia' Bibknicks have, as you say, the orange 4 way stretch insert. I have a pair of these and find them quite comfortable.... much better than the blue insert in the shorts. Not up to the comfort standard of $200 Santini T-Gels, but damn good value for money.
Regards,
Wayne
bigbuzz73
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:57 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Mulger bill » Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:41 pm

Excuse the non lycra wearers ignorance please...

Bibknicks, why?
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25554
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Postby gururug » Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:44 am

I bought some longs (netti) recently for winter thinking that they would have the padding like knicks in them but to my surprise they don't. :shock:

Are you supposed to wear knicks under longs?

P.S. If you are 155cm tall and stocky, good lick getting longs that fit. Your probably better going with knicks + leg warmers

Also consider if you are going to lose weight. I bought Mediums (34) and now after cycling two months, my legs have lost some weight and my waist is more like 32 (small)
User avatar
gururug
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:05 pm

Postby LuckyPierre » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:55 am

Mulger bill wrote:... Bibknicks, why? ...

Because they are effectively 'waistless' - no pressure over your stomach (well, there would be if there was less of it) and they stay 'up' better. I was a bit dubious when people said: "If you try them, you'll never go back" but I think that they're right.
User avatar
LuckyPierre
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

Postby europa » Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:59 am

I wear the netti shyshorts and basicshyshorts. I like them. Did 100km in the basics without a problem.

The Shyshorts are longer than the basics, the basics are cut more like sports shorts. The pocket is useful though I only carry a key and a handkerchief in it - the rest goes in the rear pockets of my jersey.

I've also got Netti's undernix with the full, pro padding - these are basically nix designed to be worn under shorts. Although the padding is much thicker, I don't find them any more comfortable than the shyshorts.

The abbrasion resistance of the Shyshorts is very good too - I was wearing the basics when I dropped the Black Beast (both times - they're my favourite shorts) and there isn't a mark on them ... mind you, the big 'air bag' that protrudes over the top might have protected them :roll:

Richard
User avatar
europa
 
Posts: 7327
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby LuckyPierre » Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:25 am

gururug wrote: ... Are you supposed to wear knicks under longs? ...

While you can buy 'longknicks', most 'longs' aren't padded - you just wear them over your knicks. I have the Netti 'Super roubaix' ones (with foot stirrups) and they are fine. They've only been out of the cupboard twice so far this autumn, but I'm sure that it's not going to be long before they are necessary every morning. :?
User avatar
LuckyPierre
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

Postby Mulger bill » Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:03 pm

LuckyPierre wrote:
Mulger bill wrote:... Bibknicks, why? ...

Because they are effectively 'waistless' - no pressure over your stomach (well, there would be if there was less of it) and they stay 'up' better. I was a bit dubious when people said: "If you try them, you'll never go back" but I think that they're right.


Cheers Pierre, Thanks.

Shaun
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25554
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic


Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], njosey17, Sweep



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU



InTouch with BNA
“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter