Bike weight in the steel realm.

User avatar
MichaelB
Posts: 14775
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: Blockchains 1950 Gana team bike

Postby MichaelB » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:15 pm

silverlight wrote:BlockChains Gana

Image
What sort of shifting mechanism is that ?

Looks very different !!!

User avatar
bowie
Posts: 1789
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:55 pm
Location: Melbs

Postby bowie » Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:45 pm

looks perfectly simply ! :) lovely tiny derailleur :)
b is for bicycle :D

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 5510
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Re: Blockchains 1950 Gana team bike

Postby singlespeedscott » Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:11 pm

MichaelB wrote:
silverlight wrote:BlockChains Gana

Image
What sort of shifting mechanism is that ?

Looks very different !!!
I think that it is Campagnolo's Cambio corsa shifter. I can't tell if it's got 2 rods or 1. If it is one rod it is the rarer Paris Roubaix. Basically to shift the rider reached down to the lever on the rear brake stay which opened the quick release skewer then the other lever was turned to the direction of the cog you wanted whilst back pedalling the cranks. Once the required gear was selected the quick release was refastened. You have to remember that this was all down whilst pedaling in racing conditions :shock: .

Blockchain
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 7:07 am

Bike weight in the steel realm

Postby Blockchain » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:27 pm

The Gana is fitted with the one lever Campagnolo Paris to Roubaix system. The earlier two lever system is known as the Campagnolo Corsa.

First notice that the fork end or drop out has a tooth rack cut in the top of it. The axle has as a mating spline, this allows the wheel when unclamped to move backwards and forwards without getting out of line.

In the Corsa system you unclamp the axle with the top lever and then select the required gear with the lower lever whilst pedalling backwards.
The weight of the rider and forward motion automatically adjust the chain tension. The top lever is then re locked and you can pedal forward again. The shortcoming with the system is the chain tends to over tension which makes for very inefficient peddalling.

The second Paris to Roubaix was developed to over come the over tensioning and speed up gear changing. Here only one lever is used, the first part of the arc of motion opens the axle clamp, as you continue the chain moving arm is picked up and you back pedal to change sprockets. Now the cunning bit - as you close the lever the tiny ratchet and paul that can be seen in the picture is bought into play and it rotates the axle slightly forward making sure the chain is not over tensioned.

There was a final version where the chain moving arm works on the bottom of the chain so you pedal forward to select the required sprocket but these are seriously rare.

I have ridden both systems and with concentration and practice gear changing can be done reasonably quickly. The Gana with long wheel base and good fork geometary is a total joy to ride of course.

When you stop and realise that for a good many years before these appeared people like Simplex and Cyclo had what we now consider conventional systems that worked easly and perfectly you realsie Campagnolo were not always the smartest kid on the block. However then they realised the Gran Sport the best of all.

It is said that when the Italian Ace Gino Bartelli first tried the Corsa system he said "it is nearly as good as a one gear bike and not a lot heavier".
When I first tried the Corsa I rang Warren Meade and asked him how he rode his Olmo Campagnolo Corsa and he said "I usually ride it in the gear I start off on"!

Cheers.

User avatar
lemmiwinks
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:34 am
Location: Northern Tablelands NSW

Postby lemmiwinks » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:53 am

My Shogun Tri-Sport weighed 10.5kg on the bathroom scales. But I thought that was too heavy as it feels really light to me so I weighed it again and it came in at 11! I'm going to stick with the first weight (or maybe buy some better scales).
"...for many people your life is not worth the effort it takes to pay attention or the extra few seconds they may need to wait before they can safely get around you."-BikeSnobNYC

User avatar
MichaelB
Posts: 14775
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby MichaelB » Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:02 am

Holy hell Blockchain - that's some system.

Concentration would be an understatement :shock: :shock: :shock:

User avatar
bowie
Posts: 1789
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:55 pm
Location: Melbs

Postby bowie » Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:27 am

thanks for the post Blockchain.

Interesting stuff :)
b is for bicycle :D

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Postby munga » Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:31 pm

57cm c-c square repco victory tri a (tange infinity?) frame - 2130g

brauluver
Posts: 3646
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: Adelaide N/E

Postby brauluver » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:51 pm

Reynolds 531 Pursuit frame 2050 grams(bare)
Fork 730 grams.
Total bare weight 2780 grams of light weight steely goodness.

kukamunga
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:12 am
Location: 3166

Postby kukamunga » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:59 pm

This mid 70's, 58cm (23"), Reynolds 531 SL frame & fork weighs: 2070 g + 680 g = 2.75 kg
Image
Last edited by kukamunga on Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
familyguy
Posts: 8364
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:30 pm
Location: Willoughby, NSW

Postby familyguy » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:09 pm

kukamunga wrote:This mid 70's, 58cm (23"), Reynolds 531 SL frame & fork weighs: 2070 g + 680 g = 2.75 kg
Image
And going for a tidy sum in 24 hours time!

300g difference from that to a Repco Superlite...hard to believe...

Jim

kukamunga
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:12 am
Location: 3166

Postby kukamunga » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:12 pm

munga wrote:57cm c-c square repco victory tri a (tange infinity?) frame - 2130g
A late 80's 50cm (?) Tange Infinity Victory Tri-A for sale on eBay at the moment (not mine). Might be a nice sub-2kg frame for a shorter person.....

PJZap
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Maitland NSW

Postby PJZap » Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:02 pm

how do those weights compare to a mid price allow frame 1.5kg perhaps ?

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Postby il padrone » Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:09 pm

Ahhh.... steel is real! you know (what this means is steel is for life, barring unforseen collisions)

Aluminium alloy is the next best thing - OK until next.... month, year, quite likely. Next decade - probably not. I've just seen an aquaintance who uses a Giant alloy MTB for his commute. It would only be 5-8 years old, tops. Frame is stuffed, cracked at the top of the seat tube. Already broken and been repaired once, now broken again :roll: . It's cactus! The only broken steel frames I've seen have been in some sort of crash or got bent and fatigued later.

Steel really is real - real lifespan.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Postby munga » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:25 pm

1.5kg sounds reasonable for an alloy frame. looking at ride magazine, the lightest (carbon) frame you can buy off the rack comes in at ~800g, and you'll be paying thousands for the honour. i doubt you could pick up a sub 1000g alloy frame.

could i expect to find a 1500g steel frame, custom or otherwise?
how much would the lightest available (traditional geometry) 54-58cm steel frame weigh in at?

brauluver
Posts: 3646
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: Adelaide N/E

Postby brauluver » Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:55 pm

munga wrote:1.5kg sounds reasonable for an alloy frame. looking at ride magazine, the lightest (carbon) frame you can buy off the rack comes in at ~800g, and you'll be paying thousands for the honour. i doubt you could pick up a sub 1000g alloy frame.

could i expect to find a 1500g steel frame, custom or otherwise?
how much would the lightest available (traditional geometry) 54-58cm steel frame weigh in at?
http://www.matuzmaster.hu/en/vintage-frames/#bianchi

Quite a few on this site at less than 2kg, some as light as 1690gms.

User avatar
barefoot
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:05 am
Location: Ballarat

Postby barefoot » Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:53 am

Another weight: I weighed the Malvern Star Triathlete frame I'm selling here and here.

It's a huge frame - 62 x 57 cm. Bathroom scales give it as 2.3kg including headset races (give or take a fair bit... they're bathroom scales after all).
Image

They sure do use light gauge tubing on decent quality frames:
Image
(and I'm pretty sure it's butted tubing, so even thinner in the middle).

tim

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby munga » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:06 pm

late 80's / early 90's 53cm sq Olympic Cycles (Nottingham bike shop built) frame - no idea what tubing - 1710g + 645g fork

Image

dubrat
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby dubrat » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:31 pm

That is quite the thread dig Munga!

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby munga » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:34 pm

*bows*

redrover3
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:23 pm

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby redrover3 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:03 pm

Just for consistancy, are we weighing with pedals, bidon cages, pump etc?
Tony

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby munga » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:11 pm

no.

User avatar
hiflange
Posts: 1938
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:27 pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby hiflange » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:30 pm

munga wrote:no.
:D

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby Nobody » Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:43 pm

Good bit of digging there Munga. :wink:

My Surly CC with Brooks saddle, Nitto steel seatpost, touring/commuting wheel and front disc brake (including SPD pedals, bottle cage, computer and lights) weighs 11.6Kg.

User avatar
Rob74
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 12:26 pm
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW

Re: Bike weight in the steel realm.

Postby Rob74 » Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:31 pm

Tube Family Vs Frame Wt

Excerpt from the Used Bike Buyers Guide, (it does not list the actual frame size).
=>> The tubesets can be compared by weight within a family but not family to family as my source(s) often included different tubes in each set of weights, i.e. some included the fork steerer tube and fork blades.

TUBING: (MOST COMMON WITH AVERAGE WEIGHT FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES).
MAKE TYPE WEIGHT (IN GRAMS)
REYNOLDS 501 2025
REYNOLDS 531C 1800
REYNOLDS 531P 1700
REYNOLDS 653 1700
REYNOLDS 753 1650
COLUMBUS AELLE 2345
COLUMBUS GARA 2305
COLUMBUS CROMOR 2190
COLUMBUS THRON 2250
COLUMBUS SP 2300
COLUMBUS SL 1930
COLUMBUS SLX 1960
COLUMBUS TSX 1950
COLUMBUS NEURON 1885
COLUMBUS PRX 2310
COLUMBUS EL 1935
TANGE INFINITY 2405
TANGE 2 2290
TANGE 1 2220
TANGE PRESTIGE 1950
ISHIWATA 022 2200
ORIA ML 25 2100
VITUS 181 1790 - for racing.
VITUS 888 2030 - a plain gauge set for touring frames
VITUS 980 1507 - a "Course Professionel" Serie Extra Legere set.
Super Vitus 983 1624 - a "Course Professionel" set
SV980 "Profil  Arcor" 1615 - "aero" shaped set
SV888 "Vitus Profil" 2030 - P/G aero set

STEEL FRAME COMPONENT WEIGHTS
VITUS Descriptions

Rob.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users