Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby Nate » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:10 pm
"My friend" was in the left most lane which was a bus (not a bus only lane) heading north along clarence st Sydney CBD.
A bus was moving from the leftmost to the inner lane & was stopped with traffic across an intersection.
There was just over 1/2 a lane of the bus lane available, so "my friend" slowed (from 25-30km to 15-20km/h) and passed the bus. Then continuing at that speed continued.
Just before they got to the front of the bus a guy runs out infront of them, probably 1.5-2m ahead.
Of course nothing could be done to avoid the collision (wet road too), they yelled, hit the brakes & the 20km/h headbutt followed.
The lights had been green for the cyclist for a while & the next set of lights at Jamieson had gone green before they got to the bus, so traffic had just started to move ahead.
So the pedestrian, was running across 3 lanes of traffic, at peakhour, in the wet, against the red man...
Seeing as though the cyclist had no chance to avoid - its pretty simple the ped is in the wrong & liable for damages to the cyclist & equipment?
- rob e
- Posts: 665
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:26 am
- Location: Just down the road from Heffron Park
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby rob e » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:23 pm
-
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:29 am
- Location: Sydney
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby othy » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:35 pm
I hope your friend got some witness names and details.
- herzog
- Posts: 2174
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby herzog » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:44 pm
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby sogood » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:48 pm
Was the rider with BNSW? The insurance company needs to be contacted given the nature of accident.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby Nate » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:52 pm
The bus was "passed" on the left, it was stationary at the time and only partially obstructing the lane.herzog wrote:Did you pass the bus on the left or the right?
So not really a pass, more travelling within their lane past an obstacle.
They were with Bicycle NSW & spoken with them, they only need to be contacted if a claim is made they said.
No witness details were taken at the time, but they'll have a chat with the cops tomorrow morn & it wouldnt be difficult to find someone at a bus stop at 5:15pm that saw it you'd think!
- herzog
- Posts: 2174
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby herzog » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:54 pm
Was it loading/unloading passengers?Nate wrote:The bus was "passed" on the left, it was stationary at the time and only partially obstructing the lane.herzog wrote:Did you pass the bus on the left or the right?
So not really a pass, more travelling within their lane past an obstacle.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby sogood » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:57 pm
Middle of an intersection? Want to sue the bus driver?herzog wrote:Was it loading/unloading passengers?
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- herzog
- Posts: 2174
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby herzog » Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:59 pm
Just trying to work out why it was stationary on a green.sogood wrote:Middle of an intersection? Want to sue the bus driver?herzog wrote:Was it loading/unloading passengers?
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby sogood » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:03 pm
Based on the story, it was stuck there due to traffic jam... The reason why many cycle commutes.herzog wrote:Just trying to work out why it was stationary on a green.
But I agree it was a good thought. The involvement of the bus will need to be considered. Irrespective, there's just no reason for a pedestrian to be in the middle of a road at that time.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby Nate » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:11 pm
No, stuck in traffic...herzog wrote: Was it loading/unloading passengers?
The lights at the next intersection had turned green just before "my friend" got to the bus, so the bus would'nt have held up the traffic if the lights at the intersection changed on him - as the traffic in front was clearing at the time allowing him to then move through the intersection.
- herzog
- Posts: 2174
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby herzog » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:17 pm
In that case I would say the Pedestrian is at fault. However as someone else mentioned, proceed with caution. The authorities seem to always err on the side of the pedestrian. Sometimes they even allocate partial fault to both parties.Nate wrote:No, stuck in traffic...herzog wrote: Was it loading/unloading passengers?
The lights at the next intersection had turned green just before "my friend" got to the bus, so the bus would'nt have held up the traffic if the lights at the intersection changed on him - as the traffic in front was clearing at the time allowing him to then move through the intersection.
Eg: they may argue something like you were lane-splitting stationary traffic without due caution or some such thing.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby sogood » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Sounded like the silly pedestrian was busy trying to get away from the bus before it runs him over as the traffic flow got restarted. But little did he expect a cyclist with a bomb proofed 36 spoke, Mavic Open Pro rimmed front wheel was getting ready to put a narrow groove in him.Nate wrote:The lights at the next intersection had turned green just before "my friend" got to the bus, so the bus would'nt have held up the traffic if the lights at the intersection changed on him - as the traffic in front was clearing at the time allowing him to then move through the intersection.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby sogood » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:25 pm
Thing is, cyclists are permitted to ride past on the left of a stationary vehicle if the vehicle is not turning left.herzog wrote:Eg: they may argue something like you were lane-splitting stationary traffic without due caution or some such thing.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- herzog
- Posts: 2174
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:50 pm
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby herzog » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:31 pm
I know. Just pointing out that they may try to pin something vague on him like "not using due caution" in one of those scenarios where they try to jointly attribute responsibility.sogood wrote:Thing is, cyclists are permitted to ride past on the left of a stationary vehicle if the vehicle is not turning left.herzog wrote:Eg: they may argue something like you were lane-splitting stationary traffic without due caution or some such thing.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby sogood » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:37 pm
Ok, so the People's Court of BNA has handed down its verdict. The pedestrian should pay the injured cyclists all damages, a replacement CF Cervelo bike, medical/rehab and for psychological trauma resulting from the accident. Further, he should pay BNA forum $1000 in court cost for site resources used.herzog wrote:I know. Just pointing out that they may try to pin something vague on him like "not using due caution" in one of those scenarios where they try to jointly attribute responsibility.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- Nate
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby Nate » Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:57 pm
The best "my friend" can do is to buy you a cup of coffee (AT) the next Renegade cyclesogood wrote:Ok, so the People's Court of BNA has handed down its verdict. The pedestrian should pay the injured cyclists all damages, a replacement CF Cervelo bike, medical/rehab and for psychological trauma resulting from the accident. Further, he should pay BNA forum $1000 in court cost for site resources used.
Cheers to all for the input... no i suppose i *should* post this on a pedestrian forum...
- Kalgrm
- Super Mod
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
- Location: Success, WA
- Contact:
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby Kalgrm » Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:48 pm
All the other forums are fairly pedestrian, compared to this one.Nate wrote:Cheers to all for the input... no i suppose i *should* post this on a pedestrian forum...
Cheers,
Graeme
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby JV911 » Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:29 pm
peds in general do stupid things. just look at the barriers on druitt st the council errected to TRY and stop people crossing against the lights with traffic barrelling down the hill
could be traffic cameras footage available if you contact RTA or the council?Nate wrote:no witness details were taken at the time, but they'll have a chat with the cops tomorrow morn & it wouldnt be difficult to find someone at a bus stop at 5:15pm that saw it you'd think!
i hope "your friend" hasnt suffered any injuries
- winona_rider
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:26 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby winona_rider » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:06 pm
- hartleymartin
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Location: Fairfield, NSW
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby hartleymartin » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:44 pm
From the surface it appears that the pedestrian was jay-walking and would be at-fault. It's too bad I can't see this one play out on Judge Judy!
http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby trailgumby » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:51 pm
-
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:02 am
- Location: Freo WA
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby Pushy » Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:52 pm
1) Pedestrians have right of way (no matter how dumb they are)
2) Green traffic lights only means proceed only if safe to do so
Just wondered how these would be interpreted when aportioning liability.
06' Giant TCR C1
08' Colnago CLX
07' Apollo Swift
VW Jetta Diesel 5.5l/100km
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby il padrone » Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:03 pm
No they don't! As my friend Euan would point out, in Australia no-one has right of way on our roads (except trains at rail crossings). We are all obliged to give way to a greater or lesser extent. Pedestrians also are generally obliged to give way to vehicles in many crcumstances, including when at a pedestrian crossing facing a 'red man'. There is a general obligation on all road users to avoid collisions, but this has to be tempered with the circumstances and the practicalities of avoiding said collision. In this case, a pedestrian suddenly appearing from behind a bus, against a red man, would be virtually impossible to avoid, and the ped is going against the road rules. No case of cyclist obliged to give way herePushy wrote:Two things I haven't seen in the previous posts.
1) Pedestrians have right of way (no matter how dumb they are)
Correct. And the OP slowed down passing through. This would be viewed as taking safety precautions, I'd think.Pushy wrote:2) Green traffic lights only means proceed only if safe to do so
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Legal thoughts - hitting a pedestrian
Postby wombatK » Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:10 pm
How fast was the pedestrian running ? Was it within the speed limit ? What, there are no speed limits on how fast a pedestrian can run across the road ? Even against the lights ?herzog wrote:However as someone else mentioned, proceed with caution. The authorities seem to always err on the side of the pedestrian. Sometimes they even allocate partial fault to both parties.
Eg: they may argue something like you were lane-splitting stationary traffic without due caution or some such thing.
Surely it's time BNSW put some resources into getting appropriate speed limits for pedestrians. If this knob had been restricted to 2 km/hr while crossing the road, your friend and bike would be in much better shape than they are now - and even the pedestrian would be feeling rather better too and I wouldn't have to call him names like knob.
But wait - this incident occurred in NSW, so Rule 236 of the Australian Road Rules applies...
For the purposes of this rule, the term driver includes rider (of a bicycle or motorbike) - see Rule 19.236 Pedestrians not to cause a traffic hazard or obstruction
(1) A pedestrian must not cause a traffic hazard by moving into
the path of a driver.
Offence provision.
Your friend was clearly obstructed and should expect the police to charge the pedestrian - especially if your friend was injured. If nobody was injured, they might do nothing other than get him/her to ring the police unhelp line to log a report.
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher, MichaelB
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.