riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Adelaide
riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby amt » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:38 pm
"You must not ride outside a bicycle lane abreast of another rider in a bicycle lane unless overtaking."
The majority of cyclists I see including myself and my mates ride 2 abreast in a bicycle lane. Wow I was shocked. Its virtually impossible to ride 2 abreast in a bike lane anyway and it doesn't matter how many lanes the road has. Yet if there no bike lanes then you can ride 2 abreast. I'm posting this to be better informed as a road user, have I got this right?
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby trailgumby » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:08 pm
-
- Posts: 3646
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: Adelaide N/E
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby brauluver » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:35 pm
Where can i get a copy of this for perusal?amt wrote:I wanted to be better informed about the road rules pertaining to cyclist and the SA handbook for cylists and road rules states
"You must not ride outside a bicycle lane abreast of another rider in a bicycle lane unless overtaking."
The majority of cyclists I see including myself and my mates ride 2 abreast in a bicycle lane. Wow I was shocked. Its virtually impossible to ride 2 abreast in a bike lane anyway and it doesn't matter how many lanes the road has. Yet if there no bike lanes then you can ride 2 abreast. I'm posting this to be better informed as a road user, have I got this right?
- soc
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 9:40 pm
- Location: Redcliffe, Qld
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby soc » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:33 am
brauluver wrote: "You must not ride outside a bicycle lane abreast of another rider in a bicycle lane unless overtaking."
If I'm reading this properly, it's saying you can't ride on the right hand side of the line between the bike lane and the traffic lane if you are riding 2 abreast, i.e. you need to stay within the confines of a bike line when riding 2 abreast.
- m@
- Posts: 5112
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:20 pm
- Location: Wurundjeri Country
- Contact:
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby m@ » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:51 am
Sounds correct to me; I'd be interested to read the road rule that this refers to though. Could just be that some bureaucrat has taken it upon themselves to inject some 'common sense' into the handbooksoc wrote:brauluver wrote: "You must not ride outside a bicycle lane abreast of another rider in a bicycle lane unless overtaking."
If I'm reading this properly, it's saying you can't ride on the right hand side of the line between the bike lane and the traffic lane if you are riding 2 abreast, i.e. you need to stay within the confines of a bike line when riding 2 abreast.
It makes sense though - bicycle lanes don't exist for our benefit; they're to keep us out of the way of real peop^k^k^k^k motorists.
-
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:51 am
- Location: Sydney
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby Chanboy » Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:53 am
Having said that, my gf and I still do it occasionally when we want to have a chat. I just try to keep a close eye out for other cyclists who want to pass us and move back to single file on those occasions.
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby amt » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:08 am
go to this link via Transport SA http://www.transport.sa.gov.au/pdfs/per ... andlaw.pdftrailgumby wrote:Given the source, I'd take it at face value.
- im_no_pro
- Super Mod
- Posts: 6029
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:29 pm
- Location: Geelong
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby im_no_pro » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:43 am
soc wrote:brauluver wrote: "You must not ride outside a bicycle lane abreast of another rider in a bicycle lane unless overtaking."
If I'm reading this properly, it's saying you can't ride on the right hand side of the line between the bike lane and the traffic lane if you are riding 2 abreast, i.e. you need to stay within the confines of a bike line when riding 2 abreast.
Yep, that's the way I read it also.
master6 wrote: Moderators are like Club Handicappers; I often think they are wrong, but I dont want the job.
- m@
- Posts: 5112
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:20 pm
- Location: Wurundjeri Country
- Contact:
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby m@ » Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:21 pm
From the link in amt's post above...im_no_pro wrote:soc wrote:brauluver wrote: "You must not ride outside a bicycle lane abreast of another rider in a bicycle lane unless overtaking."
If I'm reading this properly, it's saying you can't ride on the right hand side of the line between the bike lane and the traffic lane if you are riding 2 abreast, i.e. you need to stay within the confines of a bike line when riding 2 abreast.
Yep, that's the way I read it also.
I'd say that puts soc's interpretation beyond any doubt...Where there is insufficient room for two riders to ride abreast in a bicycle lane, you must ride in single file.
Basically what they're saying is that the rule permitting riding two-abreast is trumped by the rule requiring riding in a bike lane if it exists (subject to the usual practicability clause).
- im_no_pro
- Super Mod
- Posts: 6029
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:29 pm
- Location: Geelong
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby im_no_pro » Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:27 pm
Thanks, exactly what I was thinking but hadnt managed to put into words just yetm@ wrote: Basically what they're saying is that the rule permitting riding two-abreast is trumped by the rule requiring riding in a bike lane if it exists (subject to the usual practicability clause).
master6 wrote: Moderators are like Club Handicappers; I often think they are wrong, but I dont want the job.
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:28 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby amt » Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:28 pm
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Penrith Australia
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby brendancg » Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:25 pm
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22400
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby Aushiker » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:00 pm
Can you point to the relevant section of the Regulations in SA (not the handbook)? I suggest you do this as I suspect this is referring to a defined bicycle lane, i.e., one which is signed at each end by a sign (on a post) unless of course SA has different rules which may be possible (not all States adopted the National road code fully). Lanes marked with a painted cyclists on the road without a sign on a post are not defined (at least in WA) as bicycle lanes for the purpose of the rule referred to.
Regards
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22400
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby Aushiker » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:09 pm
Just to add to my post. The following is taken from the WA Road Traffic Code 2000 (as at June 2008)
Regulation 3 (shows a graphic of the signs as well)
bicycle lane means a marked lane, or the part of a marked
lane —
(a) beginning at a “bicycle lane†sign applying to the lane;
and
(b) ending at the nearest of the following:
(i) an “end bicycle lane†sign applying to the lane;
(ii) an intersection (unless the lane is at the unbroken
side of the continuing road at a T-intersection or
continued across the intersection by broken
lines);
(iii) if the carriageway ends at a dead end — the end
of the carriageway;
Regards213. Riding in a bicycle lane
Wherever a bicycle lane is provided as part of a carriageway,
and is in a reasonable condition for use, a rider of a bicycle shall
use that portion of a carriageway and no other.
Modified penalty: 1 PU
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Penrith Australia
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby brendancg » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:27 pm
1 penalty unit in NSW is $110 last time I checked. Regarding the riding two abreast, I am struggling to find it at the moment in my tired state. Going to work tonight where the relevant books are kept and I will get back to you regarding the correct section.NSW Road Rules 2008
Current version for 1 June 2009 to date (accessed 30 June 2009 at 15:21)
Part 15Rule 247
247 Riding in a bicycle lane on a road
(1) The rider of a Previous bicycle riding on a length of road with a Previous bicycle lane designed for bicycles travelling in the same direction as the rider must ride in the Previous bicycle lane unless it is impracticable to do so.
Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.
Note. Rule 153 defines a Previous bicycle lane and deals with the use of Previous bicycle lanes by other vehicles.
(2) In this rule:
road does not include a road related area.
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15592
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby AUbicycles » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:08 pm
And a detail - who would get fined, the rider on the inside or outside?
"officer, I was overtaking ... for two kilometres"
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby il padrone » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:31 pm
Seems pretty clear to me - you must ride in the bike lane, if it's not wide enough for two, tough titty. Yet another reason to argue against bike lanes. As others have pointed out, without the bike lane you wold be able to legally ride two-abreast and claim the traffic lane as needed/practical. Generally in this situation you would be safer two-abreast rather than riding single file in a bike lane with the traffic skimming by right on the line at speed.Vicroads wrote:247. Riding in a bicycle lane on a road
(1) The rider of a bicycle riding on a length of road with a bicycle lane designed
for bicycles travelling in the same direction as the rider must ride in the bicycle
lane unless it is impracticable to do so.
Penalty: 1 penalty unit.
Note Rule 153 defines a bicycle lane and deals with the use of bicycle lanes by other
vehicles.
(2) In this rule—
road does not include a road related area.
Note Road related area includes any shoulder of a road—see rule 13.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Penrith Australia
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby brendancg » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:20 pm
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby il padrone » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:47 pm
I believe this is an incorrect interpretation of the law, if the NSW Rule 151 is the same as the Victorian Rule 151:brendancg wrote:rule 151 nsw road rules sets out when you can ride side by side ie must be multi lane road unless overtaking
In other words you may ride alongside one other rider, on roads without marked lanes, and alongside one other in a lane on multi-lane roads (ie. on all roads). You may ride more than two-abreast when overtaking, or if specially permitted. You must ride not more than 1.5m apart when two-abreast.Vicroads wrote:151. Riding a motor bike or bicycle alongside more than 1 other rider
(1) The rider of a motor bike or bicycle must not ride on a road that is not a multilane
road alongside more than 1 other rider, unless subrule (3) applies to the
rider.
(2) The rider of a motor bike or bicycle must not ride in a marked lane alongside
more than 1 other rider in the marked lane, unless subrule (3) applies to the
rider.
(3) The rider of a motor bike or bicycle may ride alongside more than 1 other rider
if the rider is—
(a) overtaking the other riders; or
(b) permitted to do so under regulation 403 of the Road Safety (Road
Rules) Regulations 1999.
(4) If the rider of a motor bike or bicycle is riding on a road that is not a multi-lane
road alongside another rider, or in a marked lane alongside another rider in
the marked lane, the rider must ride not over 1.5 metres from the other rider.
(5) In this rule—
road does not include a road related area, but includes a bicycle path, shared
path and any shoulder of the road.
"Moving into the path" is the key bit here. A cyclist riding two-abreast in a predictable straight line would be unlikely to be construed as moving into the path of traffic (CM view 'We are traffic' ). Overtaking vehicles must always keep clear of other traffic. This rule is about preventing erratic veering, non-indicated lane changing or pulling out into traffic - superfluous really as all of these sorts of things are already covered elsewhere for all vehicles. I guess that weaving within a lane is the only thing this rule is aimed at. Mind you, I've used a deliberate quick erratic weave to remind drivers to give me appropriate room, in certain situations.brendancg wrote:also there is another section that says bicycles must not cause a traffic hazard by moving into into the path of traffic rule 253. Doesnt define hazard though
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Penrith Australia
Re: riding two abreast in a bicycle lane is illegal?
Postby brendancg » Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:42 am
Sorry you are right, read it in a rush and misinterpreted it.I believe this is an incorrect interpretation of the law
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Dodgy-Knee
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.