Shimano Altus -> Alivio -> Deore and so on
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22398
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Shimano Altus -> Alivio -> Deore and so on
Postby Aushiker » Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:40 pm
Next question in the learning curve. Whilst I have used MTB groupsets in the subject line the question applies to road groupsets as well.
Keeping in mind my riding is commuter/recreational, not racing of any kind, what is the advantage if any to a rider in my category of a groupset higher up the feedchain?
For example Joe has a Shimano Altus groupset. What advantages if any could I gain from say upgrading Joe to a Deore or XT groupset or getting a new bike with these higher level components?
Same with Chase with her Shimano 105 groupset. What would a bike with say a Ultegra groupset provide or with Chase upgraded to Ultegra.
What I am trying to do is getting a better understanding of what the higher level groupsets provide in terms of "rideability and/or performance" for a rider like myself.
Thanks in advance
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Postby sogood » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:01 pm
There can be some improvements in the mechanism in terms of ease of shift and others. But typically for the mid to upper groups, the niceness of the shifts are pretty much identical.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- thm
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:05 pm
- Location: Sydney
Postby thm » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:03 pm
Also just to get an opinion on this. Which would you say was more important, the front derailleur or the rear? I'm under the impression the rear is always more important (as you use that more often), so generally you would upgrade that before the front. Is this correct?
ie if your cash strapped could you just upgrade the rear without ever upgrading the front?
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22398
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Postby Aushiker » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:13 pm
Thread hijackerthm wrote:Also just to get an opinion on this. Which would you say was more important, the front derailleur or the rear? I'm under the impression the rear is always more important (as you use that more often), so generally you would upgrade that before the front. Is this correct?
ie if your cash strapped could you just upgrade the rear without ever upgrading the front?
Good question ... should have thought of that too.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Postby sogood » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:22 pm
One personal example I have is with cassettes from different groups. The cassette from two group levels up worked quieter and shifted with less clunk. The difference b/n the two was in the method of manufacturing. The cheaper cassette was made of cogs that were stamped while the more expensive cassettes were CNC machined, giving it better precision and tighter tolerance.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- thm
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:05 pm
- Location: Sydney
Postby thm » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:47 pm
Thanks sogood. So generally speaking its better to buy within the same group set than mix and match. Hmmm. I wasn't aware of this.sogood wrote:The front derailleur seemed to run into more problems than the rear with dropped chain, chain suck etc. So I think from a technical point of view, it's the more demanding unit. Yet again, FD is used a lot less than the RD. At the end of the day, even top group components are useless if they are poorly adjusted. I think it's easier to just buy the same group and not try to beat the system yourself.
One personal example I have is with cassettes from different groups. The cassette from two group levels up worked quieter and shifted with less clunk. The difference b/n the two was in the method of manufacturing. The cheaper cassette was made of cogs that were stamped while the more expensive cassettes were CNC machined, giving it better precision and tighter tolerance.
Haha yeah I tend to do that.AusHiker wrote: Thread hijacker
- europa
- Posts: 7334
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
- Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears
Postby europa » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:53 pm
As sogood said, going upwards gives you greater efficiency, less weight, more durability and more bling ... however, I suspect that the differences between levels decrease as you get higher.
Modern gear systems are so good I doubt there is much to worry about. My son's Tiagra setup is very good, it's only when you ride it back to back with my Ultegra that the differences show. The Sow's Ear runs un-named Shimano derailleurs with el-cheapo rapid fire shifters and her gear changes are as clean as you could want (the best part of the rotten thing, along with the ability of both wheels to touch the ground at the same time).
Best gear changes of the lot are on the Europa. Positive with never a missed shift. Mind you, they are rather slow as I have to dig out the spanner, remove the rear wheel, dig out the locking ring spanner, remove the locking ring, dig out the chain whip, remove the cog, spin on the new cog, tighten it, refit the locking ring, reinstall the rear wheel, pfaff about getting the chain tension right. I tend to only do it in front of the tele with a glass of red nearby.
Richard
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Postby sogood » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:54 pm
I don't think there's any generality here. You can mix and match and it'll still work. But with the same group, the manufacturer have already selected the components so that they'll all match, for good or bad. Much easier and no need to screw your brain juice.thm wrote:So generally speaking its better to buy within the same group set than mix and match. Hmmm. I wasn't aware of this.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- europa
- Posts: 7334
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
- Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears
Postby europa » Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:17 pm
Mixing bits though works.
My Black Beast, the Trek520, came out of the factory wearing Dura Ace bar end shifters, 105 front derailleur, Deore LX rear shifter, Ultegra crankset and rings, SRAM rear cog set.
When new, I replaced the bar ends with Ultegra brake/gear levers which then needed a gadget to handle the V-brakes as the aero brake levers on before had a different 'pull' to the brifters which that has never given me a problem and has given me braking with power to rival disc brakes and feel that makes normal road brakes feel like the dreaded diacompes from the seventies.
I've since dropped the granny from 30 teeth to 26 which, when combined with the 42 and 50 tooth chainrings, is well outside the official range of the 105 front derailleur. It is however, just within it's actual working ability so changing from the granny to the middle cog is slow and temperamental, but that's due to the range of cogs I'm asking it to work across.
Richard
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Postby sogood » Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:30 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- europa
- Posts: 7334
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
- Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears
Postby europa » Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:43 pm
Yeah, why buy campy in the first place **pokes tongue out**.sogood wrote:You definitely will have trouble mixing Campy and Shimano gearing components unless you use an adaptor. I don't see any reason to get so desperate.
It's something I used to see quite a bit in the 'mechanics' section of one forum I'm on. I agree, why would you bother mixing the two unless you were on a shoe string and were able to source something 'at the right price'?
As for me? When I looked at updating the Europa rather than buying new, I was going to fit a Campy groupset - had it all priced, and the mechanic lined up, all I had to do was send the frame off to the frame builder (she needed spreading, brake mounts moved, paint, etc). If I ever buy a geared sportster, I'll consider Campy though I was thinking about this the other day (anyone else play the 'is he using Campy or Shimano" game while watching the TdF?) and thought I'd probably stick with what I know, but that was a thought made over a glass of red while watching a race on the other side of the world. When it comes down to making a purchase, who knows what I'll do. Hopefully I'll have scrounged a ride on a Campy equiped bike before then.
Richard
- Kalgrm
- Super Mod
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
- Location: Success, WA
- Contact:
Postby Kalgrm » Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:20 pm
Firstly, the derailleurs only go where the shifters tell them to. So upgrading a FD has little effect on performance if you're still using your crappy old front shifter. Same on the rear, but more noticeable, since the tolerances are finer before that annoying grinding between gears occurs. (If you are on a budget, upgrade the shifters, not the FD.)
There is a big jump in quality between Alivio and LX, a lesser one to XT from LX. Both these jumps will be noticeable in how the drive train responds to your input. XT to XTR is mainly for bling and a very small weight saving - there is essentially no difference in the performance, and in fact, XT will be more robust than XTR over time.
I've got an XTR (rapid rise) rear der on my MTB and the XT version of same der on my 'bent. There is no difference in performance between them (I was feeling rich when I got the XTR).
My FD on the MTB is XT and the FD on the 'bent is a no-name one. Both work very well, but that's because the controls for each are high-end shifters.
On the MTB, I'm running SRAM Rocket thumb shifters (these are calibrated to Shimano's rear derailleur - no other SRAM shifters are). The shifters are precise and smooth. Well worth the money I paid! I started out with Shimano LX RD and Deore FD, LX shifters, and the whole system was just imprecise and noisy.
On the 'bent I have XT Dual Control shifters, and again, these work as they were designed to do.
Anyway, the bottom line as far as I'm concerned is to go straight for XT or SRAM X9 components and know that you've got good quality gearing which will rarely let you down and will last many years. One less thing to worry about breaking then. Shopping online at Chain Reaction for these items allows you to get them for around half retail price too!
Cheers,
Graeme
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....
- Kalgrm
- Super Mod
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
- Location: Success, WA
- Contact:
Postby Kalgrm » Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:31 pm
UK.
Address is http://www.this link is broken/
I might be putting an order in some time over the next month or so - let me know if you want to pair up to save on the postage.
Cheers,
Graeme
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22398
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Postby Aushiker » Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:26 pm
Realised my stupidity so deleted it. Can't have too much evidence out thereKalgrm wrote:(Huh?? Where did your post go Andrew?)
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- europa
- Posts: 7334
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
- Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears
Postby europa » Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:28 pm
Okay, we'll just assume you are and won't go looking for evidenceAushiker wrote:Realised my stupidity so deleted it. Can't have too much evidence out thereKalgrm wrote:(Huh?? Where did your post go Andrew?)
Andrew
Richard
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Postby Mulger bill » Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:29 pm
All done with the thumb too, so you never need take your fingers off the bar or brake lever. I fitted X7 to Princess and will never go back the the "other" brand, wish I'd saved a bit longer and gone for the X9, SRAMs higher end rear mechs are rebuildable, handy when you tend to bash it against rocks
When I eventually wear out or break the Tiagra on Deni I'll be having a damn good look at SRAMs Force or Rival road gruppos.
Shaun
London Boy 29/12/2011
- Bnej
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Katoomba, NSW
- rider06
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:42 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
Postby rider06 » Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:08 pm
unfortunately only up to a point...SRAMs higher end rear mechs are rebuildable, handy when you tend to bash it against rocks
- LuckyPierre
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
- Location: Canberra, ACT
Postby LuckyPierre » Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:30 pm
In road gear, the 105 groupset is the comparable 'value point'. The girlie bike is noticeably nicer with her Ultegra groupset than she was with 105 - not really quicker though - despite the weight saving.
Alchemy Diablo - Columbus Zonal tubing, Ultegra 9-speed groupset, UltraGatorskins
Gitane Rocks T1 - U6 tubing, Deore/XT groupset, CrossMarks
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:01 am
Postby Emrik2s » Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:43 am
The groups sets are just a way for the manufacturers to differentiate the market place provide better technology/marketing matching each of those groups.
Yes, faster response, lighter weight, smoother ride...but seriously for a recreational rider to whom arriving 1 minute later due to less sweet shifting isn't going to be the end of the world.
Where as if you are riding the the tour and arriving 30 minutes after the leader is out of the question, you'll (or your sponsor) will happily fork out the cash for the most expensive technology to give you that 1 minute advantage.
I used to be one of those early adoptors with the newest tech and wanted the most expensive model of everything, but i've come to my senses now and realise you can make up performance (for recreational riding at least) by training that little bit harder, it is certainly alot cheaper, and you'll enjoy riding more, and that's what it is about...or so i'd like to think.
-
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:45 pm
- Location: Canberra ACT
Postby thomas_cho » Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:36 pm
Okay I am one of those who has Campag shifters mixed in a 10 spd Shimano groupset. I used a Jtek device to mate the two.sogood wrote:You definitely will have trouble mixing Campy and Shimano gearing components unless you use an adaptor. I don't see any reason to get so desperate.
It all started when I got a set of Campag shifters cheap, okay they were Chorus shifters with carbon levers (I have since got over my CF craze). Anyway I prefer the shape of the Campag hoods, they look better with concealed cable routing, and the carbon bling.
The set up was pretty easy, no dramas.
Shifting wise, I'd say Shimano and Campag are just as reliable and efficient.
I have also mixed 105 and Ultegra parts (chains, cassettes, RD/FD), and I cant say that I have noticed any difference. I have also tried 9spd cranksets in a 10spd drive train, and used a shimano 600 RD in a 9spd setup with no problems.
I currently have a mix of MTB parts and Road parts on my touring bike, 9spd XT FD/RD, XT crankset, 10spd bar end shifters, 12-25 Ultegra cassette, 10 spd chain. Front shifting is not ideal, but works 80% of the time. Will try a road FD to see if it improves shifting.
Return to “Buying a bike / parts”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.