There's an update in the second post now.
This review comes a bit late seeing how the 2010 models will soon be available. 2009 models are still available at the prices below, so still somewhat applicable.
Initial CR1 Ultegra build:

More photos can be found here: http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewtopic.php?t=16198
Where bought and price
2009 Scott CR1 Comp (bikes.com.au) $1950
2009 Shimano Ultegra SL triple group set (Ribble Cycles UK) +$1000
2009 Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheels (Chain Reaction Cycles UK) +$750
Sold Tiagra group set (ebay) -$500
Sold R500 wheels (ebay) -$200
Sub Total: $3000
Specialized Toupe 143mm saddle (UK) +$150
FSA K-Force Compact bars (Wiggle UK) +$250
Hope Ceramic BB (Wiggle UK) +$150
Hutchinson Fusion 2 road tubeless tires, Stans valves & sealant (Wiggle UK) +$150
Total: $3700
Stock 2009 CR1 COMP Price at the time of review: $1900 AUD + shipping.
Stock 2009 CR1 PRO Price at the time of review: $3400 to $3500 AUD + shipping.
How it is used
Saturday 60km group rides, longer event type rides. Only 700km total at time of review.
Description
FRAME: 2009 Scott CR1 Comp 52cm
FORKS: 2009 Scott CR1 Comp
HEADSET: Integrated Cartridge
WHEELS: 2009 Mavic Ksyrium Elite Black
TIRES: Hutchinson Fusion 2 road tubeless 700 x 23
SHIFTERS: Shimano Ultegra SL triple ST-6603
BRAKES: Shimano Ultegra SL BR-6600
CRANKS: Shimano Ultegra SL triple 52/39/30. 170mm length, 155mm pedal tread. FC-6603
FRONT DERAILLEUR: Shimano Ultegra SL triple FD-6603-B
REAR DERAILLEUR: Shimano Ultegra SL medium cage RD-6600-GS
CASSETTE: Shimano Ultegra 10 speed 12-23 CS-6600
CHAIN: Shimano Ultegra 10 speed SN-6600
PEDALS: Shimano SH-A520
BB: Hope Ceramic English
SEAT POST: Ritchey Carbon Pro 31.6 mm
SADDLE: Specialized Toupe 143mm
STEM: Scott Road Pro 110mm
BARS: FSA K-Force Compact 44mm
TAPE: Pro Gel
COMPUTER: Cat Eye Strada Cadence
TOTAL WEIGHT: Between 7.7kg and 7.8kg including pedals, cages and computer.
Stock 2009 CR1 COMP Weight: 8.3kg without pedals.
Stock 2009 CR1 PRO Weight: 7.9kg without pedals.
Positives:
+ CR1 sizes go up in small increments making it easier to choose the correct size online.
+ Stock Tiagra group set (CR1 Comp only) was quiet and seemed very solid, though I didn't actually ride it.
+ Stock double crank set version comes with a shark tooth to prevent chain falling off which is a nice touch.
+ Approx $1200 (CR1 Comp only) for a new carbon frame, forks and seat post is good value.
+ Mavic Ksyrium Elites (CR1 Pro only) are strong, light (1550g) and can run tubeless, though the rims won't retain the beads if completely flat.
+ Stiff but comfortable due to all the carbon, saddle and tubeless tires.
Negatives:
- Stock handlebar reach does not scale with frame size. The reach is too far on small frames.
- Stock saddle on all 3 models is not performance oriented; at least 400g.
- At this cheap price point (CR1 Comp only), you may not get a choice of compact or triple out of the box.
- Came with a paint chip on dérailleur hanger.
- Non-replaceable dérailleur hanger if you plan on racing i.e. crashing.
- Single click from front wheel drop out. Fixed with grease.
- Because of the inflated Australian prices, a CR1 Pro frame will cost you about $400 more than the exact same CR1 Comp frame. See below.
Additional notes
Comparison of Comp and Pro frame value:
2009 CR1 Comp = $1900 minus Tiagra Group = $500, Wheels and Tires = $200 leaving Frame and misc = $1200.
2009 CR1 Pro = $3500 minus Ultegra Group = $1000, Wheels and Tires = $800 leaving (exact same) Frame and misc = $1600.
Scott Road "Ergo" handlebars:
The reach of the stock bars to the hoods was far too long. I was more comfortable in the drops, but couldn't sustain that obviously. On a small (52cm) or XS frame, you get the same 120mm reach as on a M, L, XL, XXL frame. Forget changing stems, there's just no reason a short person needs this amount of reach. FSA Compacts start at $40 for the 300g Omega; are cheaper than a new stem and you get more room for climbing. Plenty of other brands to go for also, the 3T compacts look similar to FSA.
Scott Road saddle:
The Scott saddle weighed more than a 400g Strike Extra I have. It's heavily padded so ok for short rides, but that would be it. No center channel or other ergo design enhancements, purely flat on top. The Specialized Toupe saddle is 175g and comfortable but probably not as durable as some others.
Mavic Ksyrium Elites and Fusion 2 road tubeless tires:
Both tires mounted with soapy water and a floor pump but sometimes you will need a compressor or CO2 to get the beads on. They lose about 10psi/week so need checking at least every fortnight. They roll forever - I'm 82Kg and in a bunch can never pedal on flat ground at 30km/h, it's a bit unnerving. A bit more comfortable than tubes also. 700km so far, no flats.
More info here: http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=14640
PD-A520 pedals:
These take a bit getting used to as they aren't double sided like SPDs and they don't always rotate to the same position like SPD-SLs, so require frequent turning over. However you get recessed SPDs which you can walk in with a platform similar to road pedals because the bottom of the shoe sits flush with the pedal. Of course they won't be as efficient as road pedals because there's a rubber/metal interface instead of plastic/metal.
Weight of SH-RT51 shoes and and PD-A520 pedals = 330g pedals + 50g cleats + 585g shoes = 965g.
Which is comparable SH-R086 shoes and PD-6620 pedals = 320g pedals + 70g cleats + 570g shoes = 960g.
Ultegra SL Triple Weight:
The Shimano Tiagra and 105 triple sets are about 150g heavier than their double counterparts of the same series. 6600 SL triple is about 120g heaver than the 6600 SL double set and about 40g heavier than the vanilla 6600 double set. You could reasonably expect the 6700 triple set to have the same difference in weight when it's released compared to 6700 double i.e. about 100g to 150g heavier.
Ultegra SL Triple Q factor:
The pedal tread on the 6600 triple is the same as the double i.e. 155mm. However the 2 sides are uneven on this bike i.e. the drive side is 3mm to 4mm wider than the non drive side, measured to the center of the seat tube. You can even it out by adjusting your cleats i.e. outward on the drive side by 1mm to 2mm and inward on the non drive side by 1mm to 2mm. This will make those shoes specific to this particular bike however. I'm guessing the uneven tread is specific to the triple design, but it's possible it could be due to the frame/BB shell.
Reccomendation
The 2010 model is supposed to be more compliant than the 2009. It could pay to wait for the 2010 if that's what you're after.
If you buy a 2009 CR1, then expect to change the saddle and maybe the bars if you're buying one of the smaller sizes.
Otherwise, the MS Oppy looks like a great value alternative.
2009 CR1 COMP OVERALL SCORES
Quality 8
May require some immediate upgrading out of the box.
Performance 8
Tiagra isn't DA, but not exactly a low end group set anymore either.
Value for money 9
As long as you don't pay RRP. Only 9 as 2010 models are more reasonably priced than 2009.
2009 CR1 PRO OVERALL SCORES
Quality 8
The same non replaceable hanger including paint chips and average saddle only $1500 more.
Performance 8
Let down by the vanilla Ultegra when the lighter and more attractive SL was available for the same price.
Value for money 5
An extra $400 for the same frame. To be honest this is purely a function of inflated local pricing.
.

