cell victor

stevos
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:12 am

cell victor

Postby stevos » Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:48 pm

hello, has anyone purchased a cell victor? if so what are your thoughts on it? Any good?
"Pain is temporary. It may last a minute, or an hour, or a day, or a year, but eventually it will subside and something else will take its place. If I quit, however, it lasts forever." -Lance Armstrong

mattyb
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:58 am
Location: Box Hill (Melbourne), VIC

Postby mattyb » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:31 am

I don't know anything about Cell but that is certainly a lot of bike for the money.

User avatar
Birdman
Posts: 1704
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:25 am
Location: Rutherford, Maitland, NSW....god's country

Postby Birdman » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:51 am

That is alot of carbon!

Mitch.
SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKYS. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

Until next time...

fobfob
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:47 pm

Postby fobfob » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:37 am

The frame design seems to have changed since the first batch of 2008 victor that was sold out....

User avatar
McPete
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby McPete » Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:15 pm

Someone on here mentioned someone coming off "a cell carbon bike" and the frame instantly going to splinters...

In any case, if you want your carbon bling, that's probably the most cost-effective way to get it! Pretty good groupset for the money too.

User avatar
europa
Posts: 7334
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby europa » Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:54 pm

McPete wrote:Someone on here mentioned someone coming off "a cell carbon bike" and the frame instantly going to splinters...
I thought he looked at it the cold hard light of common sense and it exploded into a puff of smoke :twisted:

About time we had a link to this Cell Victor isn't it? So we know what we're talking about ... hang on, maybe I should rephrase that seeing we rarely know what we're talking about :roll:

Richard

(compulsory cf joke, cue steel joke reply :wink: )
I had a good bike ... so I fixed it

User avatar
Birdman
Posts: 1704
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:25 am
Location: Rutherford, Maitland, NSW....god's country

Postby Birdman » Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:56 pm

europa wrote: About time we had a link to this Cell Victor isn't it? So we know what we're talking about ... hang on, maybe I should rephrase that seeing we rarely know what we're talking about :roll:
victor

Is that it???

Mitch.
SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKYS. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

Until next time...

User avatar
europa
Posts: 7334
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby europa » Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:34 pm

Looks a nice unit. Ultegra SL groupset. Velly nice ... in a carbonny sort of way. I like the way they've used the ability of carbon to give more intersting shapes without going to some of the ridiculous curves we're seeing from some other manufacturers.

Richard
I had a good bike ... so I fixed it

User avatar
Bnej
Posts: 2880
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Katoomba, NSW

Postby Bnej » Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:05 pm

I wouldn't buy a Cell carbon frame myself. Cheaper carbon frames are not as light or strong as say an OCLV frame from Trek, and are not as well covered by warranty and crash replacement policies.

Wouldn't buy a Scott either, though for different reasons.

User avatar
Birdman
Posts: 1704
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:25 am
Location: Rutherford, Maitland, NSW....god's country

Postby Birdman » Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:44 pm

As Richard said it does look like a nice unit.

But the interesting shapes IMO are ghastly looking shapes. Too chunky.

Mitch.
SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKYS. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

Until next time...

User avatar
vitualis
Posts: 949
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:15 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Postby vitualis » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:02 pm

I've seen the new Victors up front. I must admit, I liked the older 2007 frames quite a bit more. Also, with Cell substantially changing frame design between their 2007 and 2008 models, it's hard to know how relevant the older reviews are.

Regards.
Michael Tam
Photos: Michael's bicycle obsession
2009 Pegoretti Responsorium Ciavete Custom :: 1982/3 Colnago Super :: 2006 Cannondale Six13 Pro :: Late 1980s Repco Superlite

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 29060
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Postby Mulger bill » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:40 pm

It is a nice looking unit Stevos, the big question is how well one of them feels hanging off your bum. Can you get a test ride?

If the answer is along the line of "YEAAAHHHHH :D " then go for it, the spec is damn good for the dough.

Shaun
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

mattyb
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:58 am
Location: Box Hill (Melbourne), VIC

Postby mattyb » Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:15 am

I find the shapes of the frame odd. It seems to be strengthened in places where it doesn't need it (apart from the head tube) and thins out where I thought strength would be crucial such as the BB and the near the rear derailer hanger.

But, I don't know much about frame design so it's just purely a perception thing.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users