Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 1:37 pm
Can you tell me about crank arms?
TREK WSD products claim 4 reasons as to why women need a different bike, this does not include geometry yet, is the length of the cranks on your bike specific to a rider being male and female?
In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke."
How accurate is this? Or is this just a ploy to get women to buy a lower spec bike at a higher price?
Thanks guys.
Row
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:37 am
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Timguy » Sun May 30, 2010 2:08 pm
But this is all just from my experience.
- hartleymartin
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Location: Fairfield, NSW
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby hartleymartin » Sun May 30, 2010 2:13 pm
http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Nobody » Sun May 30, 2010 2:14 pm
A few things I found when shortening crank length.
Cadence goes up.
Gearing gets taller by the % change of the crank length.
In the end, it is about correct fit. It only really matters if you are too short for your cranks.
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 2:21 pm
sorry but he quesion was just generic, its not for me personally... here they are again, this is a science type question
In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke."
How accurate is this? Or is this just a ploy to get women to buy a lower spec bike at a higher price?
This isn't about me, I know how to buy a bike... and I know what I want in a bike
I'm trying to figure out whats behind a WSD, its starting to sound like a whole lot of !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !!
Missy
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Nobody » Sun May 30, 2010 2:25 pm
Read the below link and judge for yourself.Missy24 wrote:
In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke."
How accurate is this? Or is this just a ploy to get women to buy a lower spec bike at a higher price?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11417428
- hannos
- Posts: 4109
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:18 am
- Location: Sydney
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby hannos » Sun May 30, 2010 2:26 pm
Missy24 wrote:
In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke."
Well if I remember my physics lessons correctly, shorter cranks = less leverage.
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 2:31 pm
thanks.. appreciate itNobody wrote:Read the below link and judge for yourself.Missy24 wrote:
In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke."
How accurate is this? Or is this just a ploy to get women to buy a lower spec bike at a higher price?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11417428
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby GraemeK » Sun May 30, 2010 2:43 pm
Graeme
- hartleymartin
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Location: Fairfield, NSW
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby hartleymartin » Sun May 30, 2010 3:16 pm
Women typically have longer legs in relationship to their overall height. I'm roughly the same height as this girl, and I'd imagine that all else being equal she would most probably prefer longer cranks than me because her legs would be longer than mine.GraemeK wrote:Suggesting that women all need shorter cranks is a silly as suggesting all women need pink bikes ( perhaps they do?) But seriously it is just another way to tune a bike to your physical dimensions and your preferred style of riding, probably has more to do with the anatomy of the fibers of your muscles than your sex. My neighbors daughter who is 6'-2'' tall and has crazy long legs reckons 155 cranks seem like her feet are kind of trapped in a hamster wheel -- Odd description I know but clearly it is not a situation that suits her, the longest cranks I had floating around to give her are 170 which she much prefers but I reckon even longer would work well for her. At the same time I have a woman I built a road bike for who is much shorter and asked for short cranks to begin with but after a few months at my suggestion, went back to the 170's she had on her previous bike - she then realized the shorter cranks just never felt right - told me she had been disappointed in the new bike but had not wanted to tell me but that the longer cranks had transformed it and she was now thrilled with it. So I reckon that crank length is not really a gender related issue as much as a sales pitch.
Graeme
http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty
- rustguard
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:31 am
- Location: Perth, WA
- Contact:
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby rustguard » Sun May 30, 2010 3:52 pm
lol yeah a shorter ruler will let you measure further tooMissy24 wrote:"Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke."
- Kalgrm
- Super Mod
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
- Location: Success, WA
- Contact:
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Kalgrm » Sun May 30, 2010 5:01 pm
I agree with the statement, but I don't think it's only one gender which would benefit from shorter cranks. I've argued in many places on this forum about shorter cranks being more efficient, so I'm not going to beat the dead horse again.Missy24 wrote:In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke.[/b]
I run 145mm cranks and noticed an improvement as soon as I switched to them.
Cheers,
Graeme
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby GraemeK » Sun May 30, 2010 5:15 pm
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 5:27 pm
Ok, but why does it improve the performance? And why state it specifically for women as though this is what makes a WSD bike WSD?Kalgrm wrote:I agree with the statement, but I don't think it's only one gender which would benefit from shorter cranks. I've argued in many places on this forum about shorter cranks being more efficient, so I'm not going to beat the dead horse again.Missy24 wrote:In regards to WSD bikes Trek says, "Shorter crank arms improve leverage for a more efficient pedal stroke.[/b]
I run 145mm cranks and noticed an improvement as soon as I switched to them.
Cheers,
Graeme
Trek outlines 4 points that makes a WSD bike WSD
1. Handle bar width
2. seat
3. leavers
4. cranks
I don't want an argument, but I am looking for an answer as to why this is specific to a WSD bike...
Graeme I'm not saying your wrong at all, but my basic understanding of physics (ok so I asked someone smarter than me and they said...) tells us that the statement is incorrect
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 5:30 pm
Thanks Graeme.GraemeK wrote:Suggesting that women all need shorter cranks is a silly as suggesting all women need pink bikes ( perhaps they do?) But seriously it is just another way to tune a bike to your physical dimensions and your preferred style of riding, probably has more to do with the anatomy of the fibers of your muscles than your sex. My neighbors daughter who is 6'-2'' tall and has crazy long legs reckons 155 cranks seem like her feet are kind of trapped in a hamster wheel -- Odd description I know but clearly it is not a situation that suits her, the longest cranks I had floating around to give her are 170 which she much prefers but I reckon even longer would work well for her. At the same time I have a woman I built a road bike for who is much shorter and asked for short cranks to begin with but after a few months at my suggestion, went back to the 170's she had on her previous bike - she then realized the shorter cranks just never felt right - told me she had been disappointed in the new bike but had not wanted to tell me but that the longer cranks had transformed it and she was now thrilled with it. So I reckon that crank length is not really a gender related issue as much as a sales pitch.
Graeme
Did your daughter end up adjusting her seat height? I can understand how she would feel like a hamster
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 5:33 pm
Or if your really tall?
why did I start a topic that required information?
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Nobody » Sun May 30, 2010 5:46 pm
5. May have shorter top tubes for frame sizeMissy24 wrote:Trek outlines 4 points that makes a WSD bike WSD
1. Handle bar width
2. seat
3. leavers
4. cranks
6. Gotta have pink in the colour range.
The explanation of shorter cranks having better leverage for shorter legged people (and women are generally shorter) is about how far the knee has to bend rather than the leverage of the crank itself.Missy24 wrote:Graeme I'm not saying your wrong at all, but my basic understanding of physics (ok so I asked someone smarter than me and they said...) tells us that the statement is incorrect
If you reduce the crank length by 6% (175 to 165) it effectively increases the gearing by 6% which can obviously be matched by reducing the overall gearing by 6% to match the increase in gearing due to the lack of crank leverage.
So now you have the same mechanical leverage but better biological leverage as the short person's knee is bending less, so his/her leg is stronger with a less bent leg.
Edit: Grammar
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 5:55 pm
Right so basically I've decided that all points that trek has come up with is actually bogus in relation to what they say makes a WSD bike, except for the WSD saddle.
- Kalgrm
- Super Mod
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
- Location: Success, WA
- Contact:
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Kalgrm » Sun May 30, 2010 5:57 pm
As far as being "specific to women" as claimed by Trek: I'd say they are assuming women are generally shorter than men, so a shorter crank suits the length of their legs.
Cheers,
Graeme
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....
- Kalgrm
- Super Mod
- Posts: 9653
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
- Location: Success, WA
- Contact:
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Kalgrm » Sun May 30, 2010 5:58 pm
Welcome to the world of marketing.Missy24 wrote:Right so basically I've decided that all points that trek has come up with is actually bogus in relation to what they say ...
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:49 pm
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby GraemeK » Sun May 30, 2010 5:58 pm
The leggy girl is a neighbor not my progeny although I would willingly claim her.
The bike she rides is a good fit for her - 61cm frame and is well set up. I adjusted the seat height each time I changed the cranks which I have now done a few times. I have to say the most difficult thing I have found is trying to find a seat and seat position that is comfortable for her. We seem to have a workable arrangement but I reckon girls and bike seats are just a problem -- my wife has struggled with the seat thing as well.
Gareme
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 6:05 pm
I love marketing especially commercials (the good ones, not this Australian crap, but the million dollar yankee stuff and pearl izumi adds) but I don't like being misled...Kalgrm wrote:Welcome to the world of marketing.Missy24 wrote:Right so basically I've decided that all points that trek has come up with is actually bogus in relation to what they say ...
In the next session we'll be looking at the geometry of wsd compared to regular
-
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:28 pm
- Location: Brunswick
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby Missy24 » Sun May 30, 2010 6:06 pm
It can be an expensive processGraemeK wrote:Hi Missy
The leggy girl is a neighbor not my progeny although I would willingly claim her.
The bike she rides is a good fit for her - 61cm frame and is well set up. I adjusted the seat height each time I changed the cranks which I have now done a few times. I have to say the most difficult thing I have found is trying to find a seat and seat position that is comfortable for her. We seem to have a workable arrangement but I reckon girls and bike seats are just a problem -- my wife has struggled with the seat thing as well.
Gareme
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:55 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, Melbourne
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby MiG » Mon May 31, 2010 12:59 am
If we're going to bring physics into it, let's do it properly. Torque about the bottom bracket is unrelated to torque about the knee. Different points, different torques, changing one does not necessarily affect the other.Kalgrm wrote:(Actually, most people are forgetting their physics too. Longer levers are about increasing torque. Most of us don't want to apply high amounts of torque through the knees and run higher cadences to avoid it.)
This is by no means justifying long cranks (I happen to prefer the smaller range of motion of my 170 mm cranks despite being 183 cm tall with longish legs), but physics must not be misrepresented.
- rustguard
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:31 am
- Location: Perth, WA
- Contact:
Re: Cranks... do women need shorter ones? Huh?
Postby rustguard » Mon May 31, 2010 2:01 am
totally agree, the word leverage was a very poor choice by their marketing team.MiG wrote:but physics must not be misrepresented.
Lazy marketing personnel who were in a hurry to get to the pub.
took me 30 seconds to come up with this.
"Shorter crank arms improve power transfer for a more efficient pedal stroke."
those are freakishly short cranks, do you run those on your road bike or your recumbent?Kalgrm wrote: I run 145mm cranks and noticed an improvement as soon as I switched to them.
I have heard you praise these before, I must say I am curious about just how they perform. I have never known anyone who rides with cranks that short so its very difficult to get an opinion. What cadence are you running on average.
about 7 or 8 years ago. I rode with 165mm for about 6 months because i wanted to get my cadence up higher. I was so glad to get back to longer cranks it was almost driving me barmy.
I love the power I get from my 175mm, very noticeable on hills. but yes I have to consciously push my cadence.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.