I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
-
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:09 am
- Location: Morley, WA
I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Chaderotti » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:10 pm
Will slowing down my cadence to about 90-95 rpm increase muscle endurance? That's what I'm struggling on a lot, I have next to no cradio (which is kind of weird actually).
After about 2 hours of riding (average of about 28 km/h) my computer says that my average cadence was about 97. But when I watch my cadence it's usually 100+.
Mistress = Pinarello Opera, Ultegra SL
Mistress #2 = Drag Bluebird
- thelittlebattler
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby thelittlebattler » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:19 pm
So you should be spending the same amount of energy to do the same speed at cadence 90rpm. But it's likely you're muscles are more fast-twitch (sprinter's fibres), which get tired very easily. (one research paper I read matched cadence to fibre type- higher cadence equals more fast twitch fibres)
So slowing your cadence down to 90 should increase your endurance, as it will consolidate your slow-twitch fibres to do more of the work... which will make the whole gig easier ("increasing" your cardio).
Coasting and stopping etc. may bring your average cadence down, I'd guess?
-
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:09 am
- Location: Morley, WA
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Chaderotti » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:31 pm
I would assume the power output is lower at a higher cadence as opposed to a lower cadence. If Chris Hoy could put out his 2.4 kw of power at 60 rpm, he'd be unstoppable.thelittlebattler wrote:Theoretically cadence shouldn't make a difference to your endurance... You're doing the same workload (given you maintain say 28km/h), whether your cadence is high or low.
This is going to sound really odd but if I were to say, sit at 100 rpm, and then slowly start spinning faster I can easily maintain 125-130 ish rpm... But to go any higher I have to consciously think about spinning faster. On a stationary trainer with zero resistance the max I hit was 218 rpm, to get to that I had to really concentrate and psyche myself up... Hell, thinking about it now it's actually really weird.thelittlebattler wrote:But it's likely you're muscles are more fast-twitch (sprinter's fibres), which get tired very easily. (one research paper I read matched cadence to fibre type- higher cadence equals more fast twitch fibres)
That burns heaps more than lower resistance at a higher rpm... but I guess if it helps, then it helps.thelittlebattler wrote:So slowing your cadence down to 90 should increase your endurance, as it will consolidate your slow-twitch fibres to do more of the work...
Yeah due to my route this is the casethelittlebattler wrote:Coasting and stopping etc. may bring your average cadence down, I'd guess?
Mistress = Pinarello Opera, Ultegra SL
Mistress #2 = Drag Bluebird
- thelittlebattler
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby thelittlebattler » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:46 pm
At a lower cadence the force is higher each pedal stroke, but the force is applied less times per minute, making the power the same... To achieve the power of 2kW, Hoy could apply a higher force less times per minute, or apply a lower force more times per minute. (kind of like either doing one 2kW push per minute, or two 1kW forces per minute)Chaderotti wrote:I would assume the power output is lower at a higher cadence as opposed to a lower cadence. If Chris Hoy could put out his 2.4 kw of power at 60 rpm, he'd be unstoppable.thelittlebattler wrote:Theoretically cadence shouldn't make a difference to your endurance... You're doing the same workload (given you maintain say 28km/h), whether your cadence is high or low.
The reason your legs would be burning at 90rpm is because they have to apply a larger force. You could either train at 90rpm so that your muscles can handle the extra force for long periods of time, so that when you go back up to 100+rpm they're having to put out less force. (which they'd be happy about)
Alternatively, you could train by putting more force into the pedals at the same 100+rpm cadence. Both options serve so that your legs are stronger at natural cadence, and so can put more force in and go faster.
Hope that all makes sense
-
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:09 am
- Location: Morley, WA
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Chaderotti » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:26 am
Now, to train at 90 rpm, or 100+ rpm with more force. I'll experiment a bit when I go out next. Though, in theory, if I were to be predominantly using my fast twitch muscles, wouldn't 100+ rpm with more force just kill the muscles even more?
Mistress = Pinarello Opera, Ultegra SL
Mistress #2 = Drag Bluebird
- thelittlebattler
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:49 pm
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby thelittlebattler » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:39 am
Haha I guess that's true, sorry my explanations aren't coming out that great tonight... assuming you've been riding a few months and your heart has adapted somewhat to doing cardio work, the main way to improve from there is to make your legs adapt. Legs adapting is what makes it easier on the heart, and hence improves cardio fitness (explains why my swimming is rubbish, my arm muscles just aren't used to the work).Chaderotti wrote: Now, to train at 90 rpm, or 100+ rpm with more force. I'll experiment a bit when I go out next. Though, in theory, if I were to be predominantly using my fast twitch muscles, wouldn't 100+ rpm with more force just kill the muscles even more?
I guess pushing harder to make the legs burn is my best suggestion for making them adapt, to give cardio fitness.
- DanielS
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:00 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby DanielS » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:57 pm
- foo on patrol
- Posts: 9008
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:12 am
- Location: Sanstone Point QLD
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby foo on patrol » Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:01 pm
Goal 6000km
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:00 pm
- Location: W.A
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Marty Moose » Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:23 pm
MM
-
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:09 am
- Location: Morley, WA
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Chaderotti » Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:41 pm
Mistress = Pinarello Opera, Ultegra SL
Mistress #2 = Drag Bluebird
- nickobec
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:51 am
- Location: Perth or 42km south as the singlespeed flies
- Contact:
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby nickobec » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:16 pm
For example on my SS a cadence of 85 = 30kmh. But if I cover 30km in an hour, my average cadence will be around 81.
I ride quiet differently to you. I find it very difficult to maintain a cadence above 105. You can get a couple of minutes from me at 110+ and then I am spent.
On the other hand, I can ride for hours with a cadence anywhere between 75 and 100.
Also I found I accelerate quicker by putting it in a much bigger gear and pushing it from 60rpm
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby toolonglegs » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:49 pm
I used to think that too...well not 60rpm...but a big gear all the same.Until I got a power meter and realised that even thou I was pushing down much harder in the bigger gear...my power output was much higher if I accelerated at the higher rpm in a slightly easier gear.nickobec wrote: Also I found I accelerate quicker by putting it in a much bigger gear and pushing it from 60rpm
-
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:56 pm
- Location: brisbane, 4101
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby lethoso » Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:13 am
I would have thought that'd make him unstartable due to the gear he'd have to be pushingChaderotti wrote: If Chris Hoy could put out his 2.4 kw of power at 60 rpm, he'd be unstoppable.
Ride up some hills with a 23T cassette, should bring your cadence down.
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby brentono » Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:00 pm
for these variations- did heaps of it, it hurts but it works.
Cheers
BrentonO
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:00 pm
- Location: W.A
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Marty Moose » Sat Jun 26, 2010 3:55 pm
This is Perth there are very few hills here that need a 23 he'd still be spinning.lethoso wrote:I would have thought that'd make him unstartable due to the gear he'd have to be pushingChaderotti wrote: If Chris Hoy could put out his 2.4 kw of power at 60 rpm, he'd be unstoppable.
Ride up some hills with a 23T cassette, should bring your cadence down.
-
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 5:36 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby TheSkyMovesSideways » Sat Jun 26, 2010 4:04 pm
Not true. The workload may be the same, but the demands on the muscles (speed of contraction vs force exerted) are very different.thelittlebattler wrote:Theoretically cadence shouldn't make a difference to your endurance... You're doing the same workload (given you maintain say 28km/h), whether your cadence is high or low.
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby toolonglegs » Sat Jun 26, 2010 4:15 pm
Maybe thats why he says "Theoretically".TheSkyMovesSideways wrote:Not true. The workload may be the same, but the demands on the muscles (speed of contraction vs force exerted) are very different.thelittlebattler wrote:Theoretically cadence shouldn't make a difference to your endurance... You're doing the same workload (given you maintain say 28km/h), whether your cadence is high or low.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:39 pm
Not exceptionally different though for the cadences quoted, certainly not enough to trigger the need for any significant difference in fibre type recruited, which has very little to do with cadence (or force) per se.TheSkyMovesSideways wrote:Not true. The workload may be the same, but the demands on the muscles (speed of contraction vs force exerted) are very different.thelittlebattler wrote:Theoretically cadence shouldn't make a difference to your endurance... You're doing the same workload (given you maintain say 28km/h), whether your cadence is high or low.
Fibre type recruitment is much more closely related to power output, especially power relative to our maximal force-velocity curve.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:45 pm
You won't be predominantly using FT fibres.Chaderotti wrote:Well that's embarrassing, and to think I study physics
Now, to train at 90 rpm, or 100+ rpm with more force. I'll experiment a bit when I go out next. Though, in theory, if I were to be predominantly using my fast twitch muscles, wouldn't 100+ rpm with more force just kill the muscles even more?
What will "kill you" so to speak is that the same force at 10% higher cadence means you are producing 10% more power. If you are already riding hard (for you) then asking yourself to sustain 10% more power is a lot to ask.
Just focus on effort level and choose a gear that feels good. Cadence is a red herring.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:05 am
- Location: Harkaway (SE Melbourne)
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby Nix » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:26 pm
Not sure what the reasoning was/would be - but if the pro's are doing it, maybe it's not such a bad thing
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 7:21 pm
Re: I can't keep a cadence of 90 rpm
Postby PortableDave » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:56 pm
Hi Alex,Alex Simmons/RST wrote: Just focus on effort level and choose a gear that feels good. Cadence is a red herring.
You say a gear that feels good, surely that is a very subjective measure? I know untrained cyclists who feel most comfortable in 53/12 grinding along. Is this just one of those areas that takes time and experience to select a gear that gets optimum results?
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.