Cadence....discuss
-
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:53 am
- Location: Hobart
Cadence....discuss
Postby BarryTas » Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:11 pm
So what is a good cadenced?????? I know this depends on flats, hills, distance, TTs
-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: Adelaide
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby silkishuge » Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:06 pm
That seems to be a tough question.. I think it varies for different people. Maybe other cyclist who post up their cadence under different riding conditions might give you a better idea.BarryTas wrote:I have been focusing a lot on my cadence. it has gone from the low 70s to the high 80s, but after watching the TDF and readinga lot esp about TTs and i am alarmed about how high the cadence is.
So what is a good cadenced?????? I know this depends on flats, hills, distance, TTs
5-8% gradient hill cadence (<3km) is about 85 to 90rpm on the saddle
4-6% gradient hill (<8km), cadence is about 90 to 95 rpm
pushing hard for an ITT (30km), 95 to 100 rpm on a painful gearing
easy riding 95 rpm to 100 rpm on an easy gearing
sucking wheel, 100 to 110 rpm on a moderate gear
1 hour on the trainer 110rpm on a moderate gear
down hill < 170rpm (should not even be pedaling)
My average cadence on 120km rides with 1500m of climbing and uphill and downhill is typically around 100 rpm.
J
-
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:53 am
- Location: Hobart
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby BarryTas » Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:53 pm
Oh what is evryone else's cadence ?
- nescius
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:11 pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby nescius » Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:15 pm
- philip
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:57 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby philip » Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:28 pm
-
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: Adelaide
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby silkishuge » Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:32 pm
+1. If I could, I would, but that would mean I have to use 50-34 and only one of my bikes have a 50-34 chain set...... the one I seldom use.nescius wrote:Average cadence for most of my rides is around 100, but may be lower if I do a lot of climbing. Generally on the flat I am comfortable with the 95-105 rpm range, climbing (10%+ gradient) it generally drops to around 70 (not that I want it to, I just can't seem to go any faster).
J
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby toolonglegs » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:01 pm
+2philip wrote:I have no idea what my cadence is and I don't care!
- leximack
- Posts: 3400
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:14 pm
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby leximack » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:15 pm
+3toolonglegs wrote:+2philip wrote:I have no idea what my cadence is and I don't care!
most of my riding is done commuting on the Single Speed
Sometimes cadence is 30 sometimes its 130
I just ride as fast as i can
Don
- Mustang
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:20 am
- Location: Little Mountain Qld
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Mustang » Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:17 pm
70 years young.
- sblack
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby sblack » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:29 pm
If I pick up the pace it's 95+
Going up hills my natural tendancy is to drop to somewhere in the 70s, I have to actually think about it to spin faster in an easier gear. This is probably something I should focus on more.
Then when they get too steep it's whatever I can do, towing my son in the kiddiecarrier up the hill to home I've seen it drop as low as 32 with a speed of 4.7 km/h.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby human909 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:41 pm
Take a look at dutch commuters or cyclists in Fitzroy on a sunny day. Most cyclists taking it casually don't spin at 80+ cadence. Thats because the right cadence depends on the person and depends on the intensity. For the human motor it is more important to stay in the comfortable torque band than comfortable cadence.
Its not too disimilar with cars. Sure maximum power might be at 6000rpm but the engine will cruise leisurely at 2500...
That all sounds like hogwash to me.silkishuge wrote:That seems to be a tough question.. I think it varies for different people. Maybe other cyclist who post up their cadence under different riding conditions might give you a better idea.
5-8% gradient hill cadence (<3km) is about 85 to 90rpm on the saddle
4-6% gradient hill (<8km), cadence is about 90 to 95 rpm
pushing hard for an ITT (30km), 95 to 100 rpm on a painful gearing
easy riding 95 rpm to 100 rpm on an easy gearing
sucking wheel, 100 to 110 rpm on a moderate gear
1 hour on the trainer 110rpm on a moderate gear
down hill < 170rpm (should not even be pedaling)
My average cadence on 120km rides with 1500m of climbing and uphill and downhill is typically around 100 rpm.
J
- ghettro
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:38 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby ghettro » Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:07 am
- Mustang
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:20 am
- Location: Little Mountain Qld
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Mustang » Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:43 am
With my Garmin I find the exercise facinating & will be trying to improve cadence to av90 by December.
70 years young.
- one_damo
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:12 am
- Location: Epping, Sydney
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby one_damo » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:18 am
Agree. For road training rides, I find generally the higher my cadence (ie. selecting lower gears), the better my times/average speeds. And i feel fresher at the end. Much prefer to spin at 110 doing 30km/hr than 85 at the same speed.Mustang wrote:A casual conversation with a coach " if you learn to spin at 100 cadence comfortably at an easier gear then you slowly introduce a higher gear, this will improve you quicker than trying to push a higer gear with a lower cadence."
With my Garmin I find the exercise facinating & will be trying to improve cadence to av90 by December.
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:45 am
Oh dear.Mustang wrote:A casual conversation with a coach " if you learn to spin at 100 cadence comfortably at an easier gear then you slowly introduce a higher gear, this will improve you quicker than trying to push a higer gear with a lower cadence."
What will improve you "faster" is training at the right effort levels in the right doses.
Cadence is a red herring.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:07 am
- Location: Toongabbie NSW
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby thomashouseman » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:48 am
I discovered I average a cadence of 60.
However I suspect I've always liked this cadence for the 30 odd years I've been riding. I found it hard to push an average of 70 over 15km's. Let alone 90-100 like you guys are talking about in this thread!! Eeek!
Help?!
-
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:53 am
- Location: Hobart
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby BarryTas » Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:12 pm
its at 85 average at the moment
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:16 pm
Focus on improving power output.BarryTas wrote:so more specificly should i/do i need to/would you recomend that i increase my cadence?
its at 85 average at the moment
Cadence just comes along for the ride.
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:49 pm
- Location: Liverpool, Sydney
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby gauchoracer » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:40 pm
Are You Having FUN...???...???...!!!...
If the answer is YES, all else is superfluous....
Max...
07 Avanti Blade Comp.
08 Teschner Piuma SL.
10 Norco Storm MTB.
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby JV911 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:06 pm
if power = torque x rpm it may be possible to produce more power (with less torque) at a higher rpm, no?Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Focus on improving power output
250w on the flat feels easier (by HR, perceived effort, burning quads etc) at say 90rpm on the flats compared to 250w at 60rpm on a hill...at least that's what i think i'm finding with the PM. but you don't really have a choice on a hill if it's steep enough and you're already in 39x25
- one_damo
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:12 am
- Location: Epping, Sydney
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby one_damo » Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:40 pm
That's what I was thinking. I don't have a power meter and was thinking the only way I can monitor my power output changes over time is to track my cadence and speed averages. Is this a wrong way to interpret/monitor power output without use of a meter?JV911 wrote:if power = torque x rpm it may be possible to produce more power (with less torque) at a higher rpm, no?...Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Focus on improving power output
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby human909 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:57 pm
Answer: Use a lower gear.
Cadence should be what you find most comfortable. If you are trying to maintain high power then be aware that most people racers are more efficient around a cadence of 100. But this varies so much between people that you really should just use what you are comfortable with.
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby JV911 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:30 pm
proably too many variables to use average speed as a good guage i.e. wind, terrain, traffic, traffic lights etc etcone_damo wrote:That's what I was thinking. I don't have a power meter and was thinking the only way I can monitor my power output changes over time is to track my cadence and speed averages. Is this a wrong way to interpret/monitor power output without use of a meter?
- MichaelB
- Posts: 14784
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby MichaelB » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:55 pm
+4philip wrote:I have no idea what my cadence is and I don't care!
Used to care, but now i don't. I focus on other things like breathing and being comfortable. I'm now used to what feels good and what doesn't.
Buggered if I could do 90 - 95rpm up a 4 - 6% hill that is less than 8km. I'm more in the mid 70's to 80's. But the key is what feels good at the time. Each day is different
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.