Bicycles Network Australia - Australian Cycling Forums

by **redcorpsjames** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:53 pm

If we have to blame anyone can it be Contador? :lol:

by **BNA** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:56 pm

by **othy** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:56 pm

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/6703/ ... acker.aspx

by **The Womble** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:08 pm

Pegasus have just released a press release in the last hour or so stating that some news reports of a team collapse are inaccurate.
:shock:

my heads gonna explode

by **Richard.L** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:12 pm

hopefully it isn't completely gone and is the "Fly V" (American/Australian) team still gonna run?

What a waste of time for the riders.

Im guessing the evening sports report is gonna make a 5 second story out of this :shock:

by **The Womble** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:22 pm

http://www.sbs.com.au/cyclingcentral/ne ... -fights-on

by **Drunkmonkey** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:47 pm

The Womble wrote:Pegasus have just released a press release in the last hour or so stating that some news reports of a team collapse are inaccurate.
my heads gonna explode

Pegasus officially have until Wednesday to meet the UCI requirements - I cant see White pulling a big sponsor in the next 48 or so hours.......Removed by moderater, please abide by forum guidelines when participating.

by **Drunkmonkey** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:49 pm

Richard.L wrote:hopefully it isn't completely gone and is the "Fly V" (American/Australian) team still gonna run?

What a waste of time for the riders.

Im guessing the evening sports report is gonna make a 5 second story out of this

Dont forget the support team such as DS etc etc - this will affect 20-30 people just before xmas.

by **AUbicycles** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:40 pm

Drunkmonkey wrote:Unsubstantiated claims1

Drunkmonkey wrote:Unsubstantiated claims2

Moderator Says: this thread is under observation. Either back-up the claims or retract this otherwise this will be removed - 24 hours.
[mod helmet]Removed at OPs request[/mod helmet]

by **The Womble** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:20 pm

by **dodge** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:23 pm

AUbicycles wrote:
Drunkmonkey wrote:Unsubstantiated claims1

Drunkmonkey wrote:Unsubstantiated claims2

Moderator Says: this thread is under observation. Either back-up the claims or retract this otherwise this will be removed - 24 hours.
[mod helmet]Removed at OPs request[/mod helmet]

I think the decision made here is the wrong one..Are you going to moderate everyone now who has an opinion on pro cycling now unless they have proof....I have heard the same stories..Doesn't take much research at all to see/find what is going on..

Some people are just blind to seeing the truth. :lol:

by **Mulger bill** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:22 pm

So you think the poster was wrong when they asked for the post in question to be removed?

No pleasing some people...

by **The Womble** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:25 pm

Mulger bill wrote:So you think the poster was wrong when they asked for the post in question to be removed?

No pleasing some people...

Im so confused

by **Mulger bill** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:59 pm

Not so difficult Womble, the poster concerned quoted the post with Admins edit. They replied with "Remove it now then - people can find out via other forums/methods."

Hope this helps.

Shaun

by **Drunkmonkey** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:22 pm

Mulger bill wrote:Not so difficult Womble, the poster concerned quoted the post with Admins edit. They replied with "Remove it now then - people can find out via other forums/methods."

Hope this helps.

Shaun

Yeah because admin said they would remove it in 24 hours anyway if I didn't substantiate or retract my comments - which you would only moderate anyway. I am in no part retracting my comment, just refusing to expand on what many have seen with their own eyes.

i saved admin waiting :mrgreen:

You have a big night ahead of you doing the same to everyone elses similar posts :mrgreen:

by **Drunkmonkey** » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:31 pm

Mulger bill wrote:So you think the poster was wrong when they asked for the post in question to be removed?

No pleasing some people...

Maybe re read dodges posts and you will see that he doesnt agree with admin giving people ultimatums on changing their posts/opinions or having it deleted :roll:

by **AUbicycles** » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:52 am

I am making a moderater decision to lock this thread and provide an explanation.

The posts in question were requested to be removed or substantiated.
I have deemed the comments to be defamation and if they can't be backed-up then they don't belong here as clearly outlined in the guidelines for participation.

--

This is not wikileaks and this is nor whirlpool - if members do not agree with the guidelines they can be discussed in the forum feedback or the topics can be discussed on other forums.