crx zero - worth the money ?

mark
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:32 pm

crx zero - worth the money ?

Postby mark » Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:42 pm

hey guys, yes im new to this riding thing and am looking to purchase a new bicycle.

will be using the bike to mainly ride to work and hopefully more in the future.

just trying to find out if it is worth the mullah or if there has been any bad reviews on it. :?

User avatar
europa
Posts: 7333
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby europa » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:14 pm

I don't know it myself Mark, but be patient and someone who does will come along. Got any other questions? (don't forget, this has been covered around the forum so you might find all you questions answered - however, we all love the 'one out of left field').

Richard

User avatar
LuckyPierre
Posts: 1432
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT

The search bar is your friend ....

Postby LuckyPierre » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:28 pm

A search on 'crx' just turned up 21 threads where 'crx' is mentioned. I'm pretty sure that most issues / opinions are covered across them, so there's plenty to read while you wait for a direct answer.
My two bob's worth - drop bars are more versatile than flat bars.

User avatar
europa
Posts: 7333
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Re: The search bar is your friend ....

Postby europa » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:45 pm

peterrjleach wrote:My two bob's worth - drop bars are more versatile than flat bars.


Fishing the billy off the fire, more places to hang wet undies on, able to hook behind a car's rear vision mirror to get a free tow (amazingly dangerous incidentally, don't even hang onto another vehicle), you can drop onto the hooks and pretend you're Lance Armstrong ... oh the list is endless :D

Mind you flat bars would be more useful for fending off brown snakes (had a 1m one slither through the back yard yesterday :shock: and we're in suburbia) and angry dogs ... assuming both wait for you to unbolt them from the bike :roll:

Richard

User avatar
Bnej
Posts: 2880
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Katoomba, NSW

Postby Bnej » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:18 pm

Don't really see the point of disc brakes on a road bike, unless you have some very unusual hills on your roads... Likewise 10 speed at the back seems excessive to me.

I'd think about the CRX City, the 8 speed Nexus is a very nice alternative to a deraileur, it's a very low maintenance and robust system, and it's easy to change gear when stopped at lights/give ways, which might be what you want in a commuter.

I'm sure the zero is worth the money in terms of components, but you should have a think about whether or not you need those components, or if something else would be more suitable... :)

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17153
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU
Contact:

Postby sogood » Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:13 pm

Giant is a major brand and there's reputation to back it up. But I would agree with above that disc brake is unnecessary for the purpose.

As has discussed many times before, the added weight and component complexity is not justified except for people who ride in the wet most of the time or MTB with very heavy brake use. Riding in the city, V-brakes or even caliper brakes are more than powerful enough while keeping the mechanisms simple and weight down. The bling of the disc brake will only come back to bite you when you are on leg power...

Depending what more you want to do in biking, a flat bar is really not very comfortable for long rides or club rides, yet is preferred for city rides. The limited hand position even with bar ends can be very tiring on the wrist. Drop bars are suggested for those applications.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

User avatar
beauyboy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Contact:

Postby beauyboy » Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:50 pm

Mate we need a bit more info on you first. A CRX zero is more than likely worth the money but that means nothing. It would not be worth the money for me atm cos i am not that sort of rider I take things a little rougher. The same may applie to you so. Tell a bit more about yourself first!

Donald

PS nice bike but I still like my Discovery and Pionear
BCC give us some more bikeways fore safe travel!!!!
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated

mark
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:32 pm

Postby mark » Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:07 pm

Yeah sorry was kind of in a hurry last night.

Well ill be using the bike 100% on the road and live in a pretty hilly area, not sure on the distance to work. probably around 12kms.
i was advised this bike (or the crx 1) by a mate at work who seems to be pretty up to date on his riding.
He also did say that the disk brakes on the zero might be a bit heavy for the hills.
Im not to keen on the whole drop bar idea(for the time being), so a flatbar with bar ends seems the way to go for the moment.

i guess the only other real differences with the 1 and zero is the gears and wheelset?

User avatar
beauyboy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Contact:

Postby beauyboy » Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:30 pm

Which city do you live in?

Donald
BCC give us some more bikeways fore safe travel!!!!
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated

mark
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:32 pm

Postby mark » Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:33 pm

just around the corner from you :)

ill be riding from Carindale/Camp Hill area to Bulimba, on the river side.

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17153
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU
Contact:

Postby sogood » Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:03 pm

Weight is bad for hills.

Stiff frame is desirable for hills to avoid excessive flexes on climbs.

Maybe worth looking at proper road bike frame geometry rather than a relaxed frame geometry that's less stiff.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

User avatar
beauyboy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Contact:

Postby beauyboy » Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:53 pm

Me being a nosy bugger. There is a fair distance between carindale and camp hill. Have you thought ablout your route yet?

Donald
BCC give us some more bikeways fore safe travel!!!!
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated

mark
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:32 pm

Postby mark » Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:28 pm

im gonna see how far it is on my car tomorow.
but street wise ... from say Old Cleavland RD (Carina) to Oxford St(Bulimba) roughly

User avatar
beauyboy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Contact:

Postby beauyboy » Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:59 am

OMGosh, that is goin to be a bugger of a ride. Try to ride along the ridge line. I was/am going to Morningside tafe(the campus is about to be moved). If you have not got one of the councils bikeway map booklets get one, they free from librarys. Trust me they have saved me from getting lost before! :oops:
While it does not show it in the current version but there are bike lanes down both Stanley Rd Carina and Richmond Rd Cannon Hill. Ialso know these are both steep roads.

Donald
BCC give us some more bikeways fore safe travel!!!!
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated

User avatar
europa
Posts: 7333
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:51 am
Location: southern end of Adelaide - home of hills, fixies and drop bears

Postby europa » Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:46 am

Something else to consider in route selection Mark, is that you are not driving a car with an engine, you are riding a bike in which you are the engine. Route selection can be rather different and can take many months of trial and stuffup to get right.

For example, my ride from home to the city is 22km (I'm in Adelaide btw). I can drive more or less straight there along a major road and while there are alternatives, that's the best route by car. However, it's madness on a push bike ... unless you like being run over.

There are two cycle routes I can use. One to the west of that road and one to the east.

The one to the east would appear to be shorter (because the city is on the east of my main road ... at the end of the trip of course). However, the first bit of it involves a gentle but substantial climb followed by a mad dash down a rather rough road followed by a run along a minor road that is very popular with the motorised set (but it does have a cycle lane).

The route to the west, appears when thinking about it to be longer, and indeed it is, by less than a kilometer. I don't know how that works out but it does. More importantly, it's all flat and all smooth. All major road crossings are managed by lights and there is little traffic.

So, rather than take the direct route, my best bet is to turn slightly away from my destination and take a designated cycle route which twists and turns along the back roads.

The message is - route planning on a bike is different to that of a car. You need to consider traffic, hills and road surface (sometimes longer and smoother is faster than shorter and broken).

Richard

User avatar
beauyboy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Contact:

Postby beauyboy » Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:54 am

Richard has a very valid point. Route planning in a car is different from route planning on bike. On a bike you can cut corners cos in queensland we are allowed to ride on the footpath. However do not constanly jump on and off a footpath to get infront of cars. This pisses them off to no end. I have found ride like (a motorist) part of the traffic. At roundabouts sit in the middle of the lane so they do not try to cut you off. I had someone sneek past me and cut me off and nerely got hit by a car that i could no see as i took off.

Mark you have not told us your biking history?
When was the last time you rode?
Do you have a bike atm?
What kind of bike is it?

Donald
BCC give us some more bikeways fore safe travel!!!!
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated

cairnsm
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby cairnsm » Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:10 pm

Hi Mark,

I've got a CRX 1 2006 and ride it to work via bumpy bike tracks and roads with hills to work, 70km round trip, from Thornbury to Noble Park It's perfect for that. Initially I thought it might be a bit sensitive to the bumpy concrete paths, but it has been really tough and a pleasure to ride. Like some of the other posts I think disc brakes are not necessary for that kind of riding- it is also much easier to accidently bend the discs when putting the bike in the boot. And...probably increases the attraction of thieves to the bike. As for drop handle bars, I have never ridden with them before, but am currently doing up an old touring bike with drop bars and a nexus 8 speed internal hub, so soon will be able to compare flat to drops..

My advice would be pay less and get the CRX 1- you won't be dissapointed with it!

triode12
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:35 am
Location: Sydney

Postby triode12 » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:21 am

Yes I agree - the CRX1 is better value for money.

Read my comments in the following thread about it vs the Zero

http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewtopic.php?t=942

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: athman