Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
- winstonw
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby winstonw » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:49 pm
-
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:36 pm
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby Chris249 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:51 pm
Damn, there goes my excuse for getting rolled in the finish sprint there last Sunday in 52 x 13! Bugger bugger bugger!="Alex Simmons/RSTI've won A grade on the Eastern Creek downhill sprint and was in the 53x13.
Is it? I've turned up to races and TTs with a $799 (new price) Sora/2200 roadie or an old $600 TT bike, Katmandu jersey, MTB shoes and cheap Cell knicks, and never had a single elitist remark. All the club and ATTA events have been very welcoming and everyone has been very friendly.fenn_paddler wrote:Compact criticism is just another form of elitism. Which is common in road cycling...
Como Vivente road 2009
Principia track track 2014
Cervelo P2K TT 2003
Merida CX4 2010
Concaeio road
- ft_critical
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: watching the 11
- Contact:
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby ft_critical » Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:50 pm
how fast, what cadence?Alex Simmons/RST wrote:I've won A grade on the Eastern Creek downhill sprint and was in the 53x13.
The B and sometime C grade sprints are faster than A grade in my experience.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby sogood » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:00 pm
Said rider deserved to lose the sprint for over estimating his hydration requirement!winstonw wrote:Cadence and Speed for 23-622 clincher, inflated to 120psi, diameter 209mm with rider and 1/2 filled drink bottle
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- winstonw
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby winstonw » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:34 pm
Or deserved to lose the sprint for not drinking all of his hydration requirement, which is probably more common.sogood wrote:Said rider deserved to lose the sprint for over estimating his hydration requirement!
And if he drank the half bottle 10-15 minutes pre sprint, the weight on the tires in the sprint would be close to what it was by not drinking it.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:47 pm
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby diggo19 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:39 pm
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby sogood » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:43 pm
That assumes,winstonw wrote:And if he drank the half bottle 10-15 minutes pre sprint, the weight on the tires in the sprint would be close to what it was by not drinking it.
1) There's no water loss during the drinking phase, which we know happens regularly.
2) The rate of insensible fluid loss is identical between the two hydration states of said rider, which may not be true.
3) A fuller stomach will alter the aero profile of said rider, affecting the sprint outcome.
4) Risk of stomach upset by that 1/2 bottle of water.
5) Weight on tyre is a determinant of sprint success.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- sblack
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby sblack » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:44 pm
Is there are typo in there somewhere? If not then maybe it's time to replace the 20 inch wheels.ft_critical wrote:I have raced the same two courses on both a 12-25 and an 11-23 on 172.5 cranks and a 39/53 Chainring set. Both times I raced the 12 I ran out of gearing. At West Head, solo, chasing the break into Salvation Creek and a second time at Eastern Creek in the sprint finish (68kmh, 158rpm is my best sprint here on a 11-23 by way of reference.)
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:03 pm
Quite possibly, but when you aren't exactly smashing yourself much before the sprint, that's no surprise. That was my point about the pros sprint power. Per se it's not that spectacular. But after smashing yourself, it is damn fine work.ft_critical wrote:The B and sometime C grade sprints are faster than A grade in my experience.
Actually I was wrong. I was in the 53x14, not the 13.ft_critical wrote:how fast, what cadence?Alex Simmons/RST wrote:I've won A grade on the Eastern Creek downhill sprint and was in the 53x13.
So I still had a 13, 12 and an 11 cog left. At Heffron I don't think I go past the 14 much, if ever. I won there on junior gears one day as I got a spare rear after a puncture. Might have even been in the 15.
Not that fast really, only 63-64km/h but only 3 of us and a longish sprint. 130 rpm. I was just smarter. I'm sure not a sprinter, I lost a heap of top end when they cut my leg off. I wasn't a sprinter before that either.
- ft_critical
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: watching the 11
- Contact:
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby ft_critical » Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:34 pm
No typo sblack, but fair to call it out. This is from my notes, and at the time I was only using a PRO wireless computer. So the top speed is accurate, but I don't know when that 158 was printed. Whilst not a lie, it was just the top rpm on the PRO computer for that day. But owing to your keen eye I checked two recent Garmin sprints, I don't know the gears but not more than a 12, probably a 13, but at 100rpm I was at 55, and at 110 at 62, both flat. And, I don't think I can spin faster than about 130 anyway. So let's call 158rpm bull. Thanks for keeping it honest.sblack wrote:Is there are typo in there somewhere? If not then maybe it's time to replace the 20 inch wheels.ft_critical wrote:I have raced the same two courses on both a 12-25 and an 11-23 on 172.5 cranks and a 39/53 Chainring set. Both times I raced the 12 I ran out of gearing. At West Head, solo, chasing the break into Salvation Creek and a second time at Eastern Creek in the sprint finish (68kmh, 158rpm is my best sprint here on a 11-23 by way of reference.)
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22143
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby mikesbytes » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:42 pm
Back on topic, when I first started club riding in a situation like the Sutherland sprint, I would run out of gearing on my 52-12. In a nutshell I had crap cadence ability. When I switched to 53-11 the problem went away. From what Alex has written, I'm guessing that nowadays I am similar to him when it comes to cadence, so I'd say that in a sprint, even downhill, a compact would not be an issue for me. However I also have no need for any gear lower than 39-25
Alex, some questions;
1. You corrected yourself to saying you were using the 14 in the A grade sprint, do you keep data on your gears? If I remember correctly there was a tail wind down the straight.
2. You have noted that max power comes out in the 130 - 140 range, have you got any more info on this? I'm also interested in this figure from a training viewpoint
- sblack
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:38 pm
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby sblack » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:00 am
Thanks ft-critical, those numbers make better sense, pretty much right for a 53x12 combo. What data do you have on the times you felt you'd run out of gearing with the 53x12? That'd give better details on what cadence you feel you spin out at and maybe provide a better estimation of how you'd go with a 50x11 (bringing it all back to the 53 vs 50 originally asked). From what you provided so far it would seam it's somewhere in the 120-130 range, where the 53x12 combo may not allow you to hit your 68 km/h sprint but a 50x11 could. It would be interesting to see how you'd go on those same courses with a 50x11.ft_critical wrote:No typo sblack, but fair to call it out. This is from my notes, and at the time I was only using a PRO wireless computer. So the top speed is accurate, but I don't know when that 158 was printed. Whilst not a lie, it was just the top rpm on the PRO computer for that day. But owing to your keen eye I checked two recent Garmin sprints, I don't know the gears but not more than a 12, probably a 13, but at 100rpm I was at 55, and at 110 at 62, both flat. And, I don't think I can spin faster than about 130 anyway. So let's call 158rpm bull. Thanks for keeping it honest.sblack wrote:Is there are typo in there somewhere? If not then maybe it's time to replace the 20 inch wheels.ft_critical wrote:I have raced the same two courses on both a 12-25 and an 11-23 on 172.5 cranks and a 39/53 Chainring set. Both times I raced the 12 I ran out of gearing. At West Head, solo, chasing the break into Salvation Creek and a second time at Eastern Creek in the sprint finish (68kmh, 158rpm is my best sprint here on a 11-23 by way of reference.)
- winstonw
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby winstonw » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:27 am
sogood wrote:That assumes,
1) There's no water loss during the drinking phase, which we know happens regularly.
ok let's presume 30mls makes its way into the jersey but that's still weight on the tyres, and another 30ml gets tossed with the bottle.
2) The rate of insensible fluid loss is identical between the two hydration states of said rider, which may not be true.
it's possible he sweats more in the underhydrated state, considering he will be shunting heat less effectively. Hard to say which state retains the greater weight.
3) A fuller stomach will alter the aero profile of said rider, affecting the sprint outcome.
any aero disadvantage of a fuller stomach will be offset by having tossed his water bottle.
4) Risk of stomach upset by that 1/2 bottle of water.
true. ideally if sweat rate was 1L/hr, 300mls should be taken in over 20 minutes
5) Weight on tyre is a determinant of sprint success.
I've never witnessed a constant speed sprint, so I'll presume acceleration, hence weight, matters.
Regarding max power occurring around 130-140, my googling says TdF sprints are commonly around 110-125.
As Alex says, maybe they are just too shagged after 200+km.
And is anyone efficient doing 130-140 out of the saddle?
An interesting power readout for Andre Griepel in final 5 minutes of Stage 7, TdF 2011. He finished 3rd behind Cavendish and Pettachi.
http://www.srm.de/images/stories/Tour_d ... 05%20k.gif
Andre developed 1680w peak power at ~117 cadence, to achieve 72kph.
Extrapolating to determine gear, that cadence and speed fit nicely with 53/11.
Thought about calculating what total weight leads to 72kph at 1680watts, but acceleration and unknown slope make it too hard.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby sogood » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:17 pm
Still a good try though!winstonw wrote:...too hard.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- winstonw
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:18 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby winstonw » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:55 pm
OK, after giving my brain a restsogood wrote: Still a good try though!
Wiki says Andre was/is 6ft and 75kg
UCI min bike weight is 6.8kg.
So let's say Andre 75 kg; bike 7kg; shoes, clothes, power meter, helmet, misc 0.5kg = 82.5kg.
On a perfectly flat smooth course with no wind, steady state 72kph requires 1566 watts.
But
- it only takes a 0.7% gradient (0.7metre over 100metres) to push that out to 1680 watts.
- he was still accelerating during peak power, and acceleration requires additional power to steady state (there's a formula but I can't be bothered now)
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:45 pm
Of all things, cadence is the easiest thing to measure on a bike, so you have to wonder about whatever is hooked up to those bikes.mikesbytes wrote:Anyway the point being that it makes me wonder about the accuracy of bike computers.
Don't need to, speed and cadence tells you what gear you are in. You can plot it if you like.mikesbytes wrote:Alex, some questions;
1. You corrected yourself to saying you were using the 14 in the A grade sprint, do you keep data on your gears? If I remember correctly there was a tail wind down the straight.
It's pretty common finding in the science studying maximal power development. We are talking very short range power here. Here's an item that might be of interest:mikesbytes wrote:2. You have noted that max power comes out in the 130 - 140 range, have you got any more info on this? I'm also interested in this figure from a training viewpoint
http://www.trainingandracingwithapowerm ... om_07.html
Note figure 4.
Maximal power at a circumferential pedal velocity of ~ 2.5m/s
On 170mm cranks that's ~ 135-140 rpm
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Compact vs Standard double for sprinting
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:49 pm
We are talking short range maximal power.winstonw wrote:Regarding max power occurring around 130-140, my googling says TdF sprints are commonly around 110-125.
As Alex says, maybe they are just too shagged after 200+km.
And is anyone efficient doing 130-140 out of the saddle?
TdF and other pro roadie sprints are not about maximal power, and the sprints are long, hence the lower average cadence.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.