Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:09 pm
Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby whichway » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:07 am
You can't go on any worksite (or factory or mine etc) without high vis work wear.
Yet very few cyclists wear high vis clothing. Sure there are some situations where high vis may not make a great deal of difference, but there are many many more situations where high vis clothing will make you more visible to motorists. (That's why it's call high vis).
Many cyclists wear dark clothing, and most jerseys are not a solid block of colour, but are multicoloured with lots of sponsors logos. This breaks up the cyclist's outline, just like tiger stripes, and makes them less visible.
If you ride in traffic, then for most of us, that is the riskiest thing we do. Given the relatively small number of cyclists compared to people who work on construction sites, factories or mines, the risk of getting seriously injured or worse is far higher when cycling on the road compared to any workplace in Australia.
Yet most cyclists do not wear high vis clothing. The only reason that I can think for not wearing it is that it is not trendy or cool.
It seems that there is not really a significant downside to wearing high vis clothing, and the upside is that you may avoid injury.
Make you own choice.
- ni78ck
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby ni78ck » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:13 am
im sure if it wasnt there would be heaps of people not wearing high visibility clothing on site either.
Cervelo S5 VWD - dura ace Di2
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:09 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby whichway » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:17 am
I'm not advocating for that. Whether it is the law or not, it is the principle that is important.
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby zero » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:37 am
because participation is safer than non participation (as is - without hivis) - unless the participant reliably achieves similar exercise targets through other means, and requirements for personal protective equipment has a large negative influence on participation when participation is optional. If the advocacy groups pushed for this, they'd likely halve their member base yet again.whichway wrote:Logically, then, it should be law when riding a bike too.
Why do the various bike advocacy groups not push for this.
If you are builder, working on a building site, is not optional, therefore PPE laws won't affect participation.
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:09 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby whichway » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:45 am
Making it a legal requirement is not the point of my original post. So please, no more discussion about whether it should be madatory.
The health benefits of cycling are not diminished by wearing high vis clothing. On the contrary, wearing high vis clothing reduces the risk of injury, and so increases the health benefit.
-
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:34 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby scirocco » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:55 am
I can well believe that on construction sites a change from the traditional dull blue or khaki work clothing to fluoro would help reduce incidents. But is it really going to make a significant difference if I change from my bright red and white cycling jersey to a fluoro yellow or orange?
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby The 2nd Womble » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:12 am
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
- zozza
- Posts: 4133
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:58 pm
Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby zozza » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:24 am
- Queestce
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby Queestce » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:28 am
- CommuRider
- Posts: 5053
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby CommuRider » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:33 am
Yep and because you think you're too cool to wear fluoro it serves you right for not wanting to be uncool.zozza wrote:So getting hit by a car because I'm not wearing hi vis is my fault?
-
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby ausrandoman » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:46 am
Don't worry zozza, no-one is going to take away your right to be hard to see.zozza wrote:So getting hit by a car because I'm not wearing hi vis is my fault?
You also have a right to smoke, drink to excess and eat unhealthy food. The great thing about a free country is that you a free to increase or decrease your life expectancy.
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby zero » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:48 am
I'd have to say I don't believe that statement. When I riding on the road, I am typically the only hivis object visible. If there is a motor vehicle behind me, it is NOT the same color as me as dayglo orange is not a common vehicle colour.Queestce wrote:There is an educated school of thought that hi-vis clothing is becoming less and less noticeable. Every man and his dog wears it now, people are too used to seeing it.
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22398
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:00 am
zero wrote:I'd have to say I don't believe that statement. When I riding on the road, I am typically the only hivis object visible. If there is a motor vehicle behind me, it is NOT the same color as me as dayglo orange is not a common vehicle colour.Queestce wrote:There is an educated school of thought that hi-vis clothing is becoming less and less noticeable. Every man and his dog wears it now, people are too used to seeing it.
- More details here.Visibility limitations make cycling at night particularly dangerous. We previously reported cyclists’ perceptions of their own visibility at night and identified clothing configurations that made them feel visible. In this study we sought to determine whether these self-perceptions reflect actual visibility when wearing these clothing configurations. In a closed-road driving environment, cyclists wore black clothing, a fluorescent vest, a reflective vest, or a reflective vest plus ankle and knee reflectors. Drivers recognised more cyclists wearing the reflective vest plus reflectors (90%) than the reflective vest alone (50%), fluorescent vest (15%) or black clothing (2%). Older drivers recognised the cyclists less often than younger drivers (51% vs 27%). The findings suggest that reflective ankle and knee markings are particularly valuable at night, while fluorescent clothing is not. Cyclists wearing fluorescent clothing may be at particular risk if they incorrectly believe themselves to be conspicuous to drivers at night.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby The 2nd Womble » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:07 am
I just jad an awesome idea. Leading (or is that Trailing) edges of all motor vehicle doors requied by ADR's to be painted Flouro Yellow and emit a high pitched whistle when opening that only a Cyclist or Sheep Dog can hear. Thats copyrighted now that I've put it out there btw
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby zero » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:11 am
(a) those results are not scaled against light sets (which I use).
(b) the vast majority of hivis in use by cyclists is both fluorescent and reflective (mine is).
(c) my shoes are reflective, so I would hit their 90% option anyway.
During the day, my light is severely diminished in visibility (especially the tail light), reflection is entirely useless and the primary identification is visible cyclist shape.
- uncle arthur
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:45 pm
- Location: Brisvegas
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby uncle arthur » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:12 am
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22398
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:28 am
Yeah I appreciate it was not a great piece of research; really just putting it out there as one of the few pieces of research on the topic I am aware of or rather have details of.zero wrote:Night time is a different matter Andrew -
(a) those results are not scaled against light sets (which I use).
(b) the vast majority of hivis in use by cyclists is both fluorescent and reflective (mine is).
(c) my shoes are reflective, so I would hit their 90% option anyway.
During the day, my light is severely diminished in visibility (especially the tail light), reflection is entirely useless and the primary identification is visible cyclist shape.
I tend to ride with vests with winter (temperature control) and hence wear high-vis one plus of course on Audax rides at night as it is a requirement. In summer I don't bother unless it is a night Audax ride.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby zero » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:41 am
8% of caucasion males, negligable females, so probably reasonable to presume 5% of drivers. I'm almost certainly better off optimising for the 95%.The 2nd Womble wrote:Of you're Red/Green colorblind like me, Fluro Orange may as well be camoflage. Again though, you have the right to wear what ever suits It doesn't negate the motorists responsability to take due care.
I just jad an awesome idea. Leading (or is that Trailing) edges of all motor vehicle doors requied by ADR's to be painted Flouro Yellow and emit a high pitched whistle when opening that only a Cyclist or Sheep Dog can hear. Thats copyrighted now that I've put it out there btw
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby sogood » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:51 am
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby The 2nd Womble » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:56 am
Pffft! you with your reasoning and logic backed up with figureszero wrote:8% of caucasion males, negligable females, so probably reasonable to presume 5% of drivers. I'm almost certainly better off optimising for the 95%.The 2nd Womble wrote:Of you're Red/Green colorblind like me, Fluro Orange may as well be camoflage. Again though, you have the right to wear what ever suits It doesn't negate the motorists responsability to take due care.
I just jad an awesome idea. Leading (or is that Trailing) edges of all motor vehicle doors requied by ADR's to be painted Flouro Yellow and emit a high pitched whistle when opening that only a Cyclist or Sheep Dog can hear. Thats copyrighted now that I've put it out there btw
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22398
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby Aushiker » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:57 am
Lucky I am a old slow commuter then and a "long" (cough) distance rider ... none of this I am hero as I rode 50 km rubbishsogood wrote:High vis vests are typically poor fitting and don't work for a high speed roadie. Too much drag and a power drain in the all important Commuter Cup.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:47 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby GraemeL » Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:05 am
Someone mentioned they are not effective at night. I disagree, they are highly visible at night, the green fluoro seems to be better for night riding, while the orange is best for daylight.
I will say though, we use the regular work wear high vis vests, which are not designed for cycling and in the summer months they can become quite hot. I would assume there are vests designed for cycling.
It amazes me that people think it's a waste of time, given the high risks we face when riding in traffic, it makes sense to try and stand out.
Maybe they think it weighs too much or interferes with the sleek lines of their road bike, or maybe they just don't want to cover their fancy jersey because it interferes with the aerodynamics.
Graeme
* Bicycle Camera FAQ's *** Mounting FAQ’s & DIY Mounts *
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby rkelsen » Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:22 am
I reject the premise that anyone not wearing hi-vis clothing is asking to be injured. That argument is akin to saying that girls in miniskirts are asking for it.
The mentality is just wrong.
Edit: There is scientific proof that head injuries in cars are extremely common. How many drivers wear helmets? Is it because they'd rather have a head injury than look uncool?
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby zero » Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:24 am
The fabric isn't effective at night - its whole effect relies on conversion of UV radiation to visible light (which regular clothing does not do). The stripes are the only effective bit at night, and obviously if there is no reflectable light source, then you are mostly down to your light set. If you see someone that is roadworking on a regular night shift, they will generally be wearing white overalls with retro reflective striping, even though on the face of it, white would seem to be a dumb color (going to get instantly grubby) for roadworking - because white is the best color for pure night gear.GraemeL wrote:I agree with using high vis vests. Myself and the little lady wear them, we would rather look uncool and be seen, than be cool and run over.
Someone mentioned they are not effective at night. I disagree, they are highly visible at night, the green fluoro seems to be better for night riding,
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Would cyclists rather be injured than uncool?
Postby il padrone » Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:24 am
Not what a recent study has shown.GraemeL wrote:Someone mentioned they are not effective at night. I disagree, they are highly visible at night, the green fluoro seems to be better for night riding, while the orange is best for daylight.
Fluoro vests and clothing are good in low daylight (dawn/dusk/stormy weather) - no better than white clothing at night. For best all round visibility use reflective clothing or patches, on bags/bike at night.The study was conducted on a closed road circuit at night where driver participants of various ages were were in a specially equipped vehicle and bike rider participants wore various combinations of clothing.
The researchers were from the School of Optometry, Queensland Institute of Technology; Department of Psychology, Clemson University, South Carolina; and The Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety, Queensland.
The researchers said fluorescent materials had little visibility benefit at night, as they are activated only by UV radiation, which is lacking in headlights and streetlights.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.