Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby beauyboy » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:54 pm
The BCC has just released a new active transport strategy. It is currently open to consultation.
The thing is only 16pages and of that over half is pictures . Please remember to respond to this because what response will dictate how the council will react.
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Rhubarb » Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:08 pm
Am I the only one who thinks that is a terribly low target?
The Netherlands have achieved something like 30-50% of short trips by bicycle in 30 years and whilst those numbers sound high for Brisbane, I still think 5% is a very low number to be shooting for with 15 years to get there !!!!
A target of 20% would have indicated to me that they were planning a lot more infrastructure investment, which is basically all that you need to get a lot more people cycling. Percieved safety I think is the biggest inhibiter to cycle commuting.
More and more are seeing the light on their own and things like Cadel winning TDF, GreenEdge coming in, etc are only going to help the rise of the sport of cycling in Australia. Along with this will be recreational and utility cycling.
Frankly, I think they'd hit 5% in 15 years if they did nothing. I hope thats not what they are planning.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:29 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Gabe » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:05 am
I love cycling but there's no way in hell I would ride the 25km up and down hills and in heavy traffic, especially in summer, to get to the city from where I live. Even riding around the city isn't the easiest thing, there just isn't very much space. The central part of the city is squashed into a tiny area while greater brisbane is all over the place, so getting to the city is often a mission but the when you're there you don't have the space to ride around freely. I support any effort for infrastructure that makes cycling easier and more viable, but I also see things realistically. And I have to say, it's not neccessarily a bad thing that cycling isn't huge over here. Imagine if there were 5 times as many cyclists on the paths, some who are complete amateurs and some who want to go fast. Messy.
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Comedian » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:44 am
http://hembrow.blogspot.com/2011/02/all ... -post.htmlGabe wrote:I think you're taking things waaaaaaaay out of context. The Netherlands is well-suited to cycling in terms of terrain (it's flat), town layouts, climate, distances, and cultural attitude. Brisbane is spread out across a massive area, town planning has been poor, the heat of summer is ridiculously intense, many places are incredibly hilly, and cycling is seen as something that you take seriously rather than just something people do. And the last point is actually partly the fault of cyclists.
I love cycling but there's no way in hell I would ride the 25km up and down hills and in heavy traffic, especially in summer, to get to the city from where I live. Even riding around the city isn't the easiest thing, there just isn't very much space. The central part of the city is squashed into a tiny area while greater brisbane is all over the place, so getting to the city is often a mission but the when you're there you don't have the space to ride around freely. I support any effort for infrastructure that makes cycling easier and more viable, but I also see things realistically. And I have to say, it's not neccessarily a bad thing that cycling isn't huge over here. Imagine if there were 5 times as many cyclists on the paths, some who are complete amateurs and some who want to go fast. Messy.
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby beauyboy » Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:16 pm
I agree with comedian excuses excuses!Gabe wrote:I think you're taking things waaaaaaaay out of context. The Netherlands is well-suited to cycling in terms of terrain (it's flat), town layouts, climate, distances, and cultural attitude. Brisbane is spread out across a massive area, town planning has been poor, the heat of summer is ridiculously intense, many places are incredibly hilly, and cycling is seen as something that you take seriously rather than just something people do. And the last point is actually partly the fault of cyclists.
I love cycling but there's no way in hell I would ride the 25km up and down hills and in heavy traffic, especially in summer, to get to the city from where I live. Even riding around the city isn't the easiest thing, there just isn't very much space. The central part of the city is squashed into a tiny area while greater brisbane is all over the place, so getting to the city is often a mission but the when you're there you don't have the space to ride around freely. I support any effort for infrastructure that makes cycling easier and more viable, but I also see things realistically. And I have to say, it's not neccessarily a bad thing that cycling isn't huge over here. Imagine if there were 5 times as many cyclists on the paths, some who are complete amateurs and some who want to go fast. Messy.
First things first, most work journeys (55%) are less then 10km (as per page 91 "Connecting SEQ 2031") not 25km. 10km is an easy distance to ride infact I do it every day.
Heat does not turn people off riding in Brisbane, and if it did way is there more people riding, to and from work in summer then there is in winter?
What makes an amateur an amateur? Lack of experiance, if the were more people on bikes there would be less amateurs because they would be riding more often.
The fact is low cycling rates in Brisbane have more to do with very little infrastructure then other issues. Just look at New Farm (before the floods), Woolloongabba and Toowong all three areas have decent infrastructure and have a cycling rate for to work trips of between 5-10%. This is ofcourse with there only being one cycling corridor in each area respectively.
Making excuses is the easy way out and one I will never except for increasing cycling's trip share.
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:29 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Gabe » Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:36 pm
I agree wholeheartedly that we should strive for a better cycling infrastructure and encourage others to ride, but my whole argument (which, as expected, has been pretty much ignored in this forum) is that we shouldn't be blindly bashing the government when they are in fact trying to encourage cycling. Constructive criticism is fine, and maybe the goals are slightly low, but fyi I am from Europe and have travelled across most European countries as well as parts of the US, a few Asian countries, and the northern tip of Africa. So I DO in fact have some global context, and can say with confidence that Brisbane is nothing like any Dutch city, neither in layout, culture and attitudes, or climate (and various things like politics, infrastructure, and education which all fall under the aforementioned broader categories). It's like saying we should try to build up surfing in The Netherlands to the same level as here.
And another fyi, the militant and elitist attitude of many road cyclists is what puts a lot of people I know off riding in the first place. It pushes me away from road cycling, for one thing. Everybody seems to take themselves and the sport way too seriously, and if you want to make a comparison with The Netherlands then you should start with that - they are incredibly casual about it, and that's one of the main reasons for it being so accessible.
Keep on flaming if you want, but the "with us or against us" kind of approach isn't very constructive. I say push for improvements (and it has been working), but be reasonable and willing to compromise. It's called "Being Democratic", and many people will be more willing to support you than if you're dictatorial.
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby beauyboy » Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:23 am
The fact is the main limiting factor to increasing bicycle usage in Brisbane is Infrastructure as can be seen on page 20 of "Queensland Cycle Strategy".
As for road bikes most commuter cyclists in Brisbane do not ride in on one. The Trash Mail might show road bikes everywhere but that is not what most people ride.
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
- London Boy
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby London Boy » Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:05 am
My shortest commuting route is a shade under 27k. My preferred commuting route is a shade over 30k. Still manage to get on the bike...Gabe wrote:I live 25km from the city. If you'd read my post properly you would have seen that.
But what we should be doing is holding the government to account, to see cycling not as a minority interest but as a mode of transport for the mainstream. In Brisbane we're spending billions on road tunnels and busways. The spend on cycling is, by comparison, negligible and yet cycling has the potential to carry a significant proportion of the travelling public. And by spend I mean cycleways, yes, and also education, including in schools and also in a more comprehensive driver training and testing regime.Gabe wrote:I agree wholeheartedly that we should strive for a better cycling infrastructure and encourage others to ride, but my whole argument (which, as expected, has been pretty much ignored in this forum) is that we shouldn't be blindly bashing the government when they are in fact trying to encourage cycling.
What the government(s) are doing is creditable, but only to minimal degree. Their words and actions are less than a complete match.
I, too, am from Europe, etc. Not really the point. The goals are more than slightly low.Gabe wrote:Constructive criticism is fine, and maybe the goals are slightly low, but fyi I am from Europe ...
Just one thing - building cycling here is nothing like building surfing in the NL. The comparison holds water only if cycling is viewed solely as entertainment, in the way that, say, footie is entertainment.
It isn't. Cycling is entertainment for some, but a mode of transport for most (and both for many). I've yet to come across anyone commuting by surfboard.
Isn't it possible that this militancy is a reaction to the attitudes displayed towards cyclists when those cyclists have the temerity to use the roads. It's hard to be casual when you've just had a bottle thrown at you out of some ute.Gabe wrote:And another fyi, the militant and elitist attitude of many road cyclists is what puts a lot of people I know off riding in the first place.
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Rhubarb » Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:42 am
Wow Gabe - I'm not sure how you have extrapolated my original post to these inferred attitudes, but I'll clarify my position in case others read it that way too.Gabe wrote:I live 25km from the city. If you'd read my post properly you would have seen that.
I agree wholeheartedly that we should strive for a better cycling infrastructure and encourage others to ride, but my whole argument (which, as expected, has been pretty much ignored in this forum) is that we shouldn't be blindly bashing the government when they are in fact trying to encourage cycling. Constructive criticism is fine, and maybe the goals are slightly low, but fyi I am from Europe and have travelled across most European countries as well as parts of the US, a few Asian countries, and the northern tip of Africa. So I DO in fact have some global context, and can say with confidence that Brisbane is nothing like any Dutch city, neither in layout, culture and attitudes, or climate (and various things like politics, infrastructure, and education which all fall under the aforementioned broader categories). It's like saying we should try to build up surfing in The Netherlands to the same level as here.
And another fyi, the militant and elitist attitude of many road cyclists is what puts a lot of people I know off riding in the first place. It pushes me away from road cycling, for one thing. Everybody seems to take themselves and the sport way too seriously, and if you want to make a comparison with The Netherlands then you should start with that - they are incredibly casual about it, and that's one of the main reasons for it being so accessible.
Keep on flaming if you want, but the "with us or against us" kind of approach isn't very constructive. I say push for improvements (and it has been working), but be reasonable and willing to compromise. It's called "Being Democratic", and many people will be more willing to support you than if you're dictatorial.
The fundamental premise of my post is that I believe that transport cycling (as opposed to sport cycling) can achieve a growth from current 1.6% to 5% takeup within 15 years without any further infrastructure investment or other govt intervention. I also believe we could achieve 10-20% with Govt intervention, mainly through infrastructure (such as Northern veloway, eastern suburbs veloway etc) as well as educational campaigns focussing on safety and promoting the benefits of cycling to individuals and the broader community.
I have worked as a consultant / contractor in govt departments so I absolutely know how hard it is to bring about change. I know of many good people in Govt struggling to get good ideas going. So I'm definitely not "blindly bashing" anyone. I fully support the development of an active transport strategy, just think that so much more is achievable relatively easily.
As background, I grew up on a small hobby farm outside a small town in central qld. I cycled maybe 3-4kms each way to primary school from grade 2 onwards. High school was 15km each way cycle. Came down to Brisbane for uni and cycled there about 8kms each way. Started work and cycled there too for 7 years. That was all changed when I got a company car and a parking spot. The cycling stopped for 10 years. A little over 2 years ago I started working back in the city but with no car park, so I decided to start riding the bike again and its been fantastic for me in so many ways. I've dropped 8-10kgs and am much fitter and healthier than I was. I am happier, and less stressed, and its saved me so much money. For the first year I still drove to the bus stop in wet weather, but earlier this year I sold the car (now a 1 car family) and commute via bike in all weather. So I am saving time, money, relieving road congestion for others motorists, improving their air quality etc etc etc.
So I'm not a sport cyclist, rather a middle aged commuter. Sure I ride to work in lycra on a carbon fibre road bike but thats because its functional over a 20kms commute. On the weekend though I do short trips up the local shops (2kms) on my old clunker bike in normal clothes.
I am only able to do this though because I have access to good infrastructure along the Western Freeway bikepath which provides a safe route in to the city. Similar Veloways (dedicated high speed bike only paths on major routes) are needed in the Northern and Eastern suburbs. Build these and the riders will come!!!!!
Combine this with positive campains to change the attitude of some drivers towards cyclists, and cycling has the potential to increase dramatically.
-
- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby jasonc » Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:50 am
so you live near me - centenary suburbsRhubarb wrote: So I'm not a sport cyclist, rather a middle aged commuter. Sure I ride to work in lycra on a carbon fibre road bike but thats because its functional over a 20kms commute. On the weekend though I do short trips up the local shops (2kms) on my old clunker bike in normal clothes.
I am only able to do this though because I have access to good infrastructure along the Western Freeway bikepath which provides a safe route in to the city.
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Rhubarb » Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:13 am
Sort of - I live in Brookfield. I use parks and backstreets to join up with the western freeway bikepath at Fig Tree Pocket Rd.jasonc wrote: so you live near me - centenary suburbs
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Rhubarb » Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:18 am
Say hi if you see me
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby mikesbytes » Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:38 pm
Is there a figure for commuting? Or is that the same as the 1.6% of trips?
5% is current Aussie best practice (Perth, Melbourne). But 10% is quite realistic, if the appropriate infrastructure appears
-
- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby jasonc » Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:42 pm
absolutely will. safe ridingRhubarb wrote:PS I ride a white Malvern Star Oppy C5 and wear a flouro green jersey with a flouro green backpack cover.
Say hi if you see me
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 12:25 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Undertow » Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:31 pm
Why would you choose to live that far away from where you work?Gabe wrote:I live 25km from the city.
The amount of people that make that choice is one of the reasons why brisbane traffic sucks so hard. Every day you've got people who live in the south driving to work in the north and vice versa, all crossing over around the CBD. It's just stupid.
-
- Posts: 12225
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby jasonc » Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:46 pm
I live just over 22kms by bike from work BUT I live less than 10 minutes walk from the golf club I used to be a member of, 2km from the outlaws, 4km from the wife's grandparents, and 6km from one of her uncles...Undertow wrote:Why would you choose to live that far away from where you work?Gabe wrote:I live 25km from the city.
The amount of people that make that choice is one of the reasons why brisbane traffic sucks so hard. Every day you've got people who live in the south driving to work in the north and vice versa, all crossing over around the CBD. It's just stupid.
- Max
- Posts: 2895
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:29 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Max » Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:18 pm
I'm trying hard not to bite, but I just can't....Undertow wrote:Why would you choose to live that far away from where you work?Gabe wrote:I live 25km from the city.
The amount of people that make that choice is one of the reasons why brisbane traffic sucks so hard. Every day you've got people who live in the south driving to work in the north and vice versa, all crossing over around the CBD. It's just stupid.
I live on the north side and work on the south side. I hate the south side. I think it's ugly, industrial and grimy. I would never choose to live there. I work there because that's where my job is. I took the job because I needed money. I stayed in the job because it suits me. How is that stupid?
My missus is a cardiac theatre nurse at Prince Charles. We live 15 minutes drive from there. When someone's aorta dissects, minutes matter. If she can't get there quickly, someone dies. Aside from the fact that the south side sucks, we live on the north side for its proximity to the hospital. Or maybe you'd prefer it if she got a job at the PA, so that it's closer to my work?
Bah.
Max
----------
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk. All typos are Auto-Correct's fault, not mine
Cycling is sometimes like bobbing for apples in a bucket full of dicks. - SydGuy
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby beauyboy » Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:26 pm
I have to bite as well sorryUndertow wrote:Why would you choose to live that far away from where you work?Gabe wrote:I live 25km from the city.
The amount of people that make that choice is one of the reasons why brisbane traffic sucks so hard. Every day you've got people who live in the south driving to work in the north and vice versa, all crossing over around the CBD. It's just stupid.
The fact is generally people can choose where they live(and buy) but if they are in need, cannot choose where they work. Remember we are currently in a Employers market not an employees market
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
- colaiacw
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:42 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby colaiacw » Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:54 am
Another sore point for me is the fact that mains roads will upgrade a road, such as Redland Bay road heading up to Duncan road, and then do absolutely nothing at a major roundabout for cyclists which forces you into a lane of traffic? What is going on there? The number of close calls I have had there is nerve racking and I avoid that junction at all costs between 6:00 am and 7:00pm Monday to Saturday, keep in mind that this is when most cyclists would use this area!
If bike paths were actually built and people actually know where they are and go, it would probably make people get on the bike instead of taking the car. I try to find maps and information on where bike paths are and if you download the maps from the council, best of luck trying to read them for fine details. I could be looking in the wrong place, but that is also my point, I don’t know where to find it!!
They need to promote the infrastructure and make people aware of it if it is to succeed.
When you feel yourself struggling up a hill, just get over it!
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:54 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Qld
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Disco » Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:07 am
Get her to work at PA, we're much nicer there...Max wrote: My missus is a cardiac theatre nurse at Prince Charles. We live 15 minutes drive from there. When someone's aorta dissects, minutes matter. If she can't get there quickly, someone dies. Aside from the fact that the south side sucks, we live on the north side for its proximity to the hospital. Or maybe you'd prefer it if she got a job at the PA, so that it's closer to my work?
- ekib
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:52 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby ekib » Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:49 pm
Getting back to the OP, the BCC draft document is very brief and very vague. It gives no comittment at all in $$ financial terms. It does give some targets on modal share and it does say how much money they have spent in the past ($100million over 4 years).beauyboy wrote:http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/strategi ... y_full.pdf
The BCC has just released a new active transport strategy. It is currently open to consultation.
The thing is only 16pages and of that over half is pictures . Please remember to respond to this because what response will dictate how the council will react.
Donald
So, since we all have good ideas about cycling here and that the BCC has asked for suggestions, I suggest we all spend some time to actually sit down and submit some thoughts to the council.
Yours in Cycling,
Ekib
- beauyboy
- Posts: 1337
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:45 pm
- Location: New Farm, Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby beauyboy » Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:20 pm
We are now down to $90 million and how many more projects were infact co founded by state by council has decided to include the entire cost in the $100 million. Accounting is a very good way to lye without infact lying.
Donald
Upgrade the NCL now QR!!!!!!
http://nakedcyclistbrissy.blogspot.com/
My views do not represent any organisation I may be apart of unless otherwise stated
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Rhubarb » Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:16 am
ref: http://translink.com.au/tickets-and-far ... nned-fares
So 2 years from now a zone 4 bus trip (eg from my home to cbd) will cost $3,000 per year (48 weeks working minus 5 public hols = 470 trips (AT) $6.32 each).
So getting back to my original premise, I think factors such as this would see the cycle commuting rates increase to 5% within 15 years without any other significant government investment.
Combined with govt investment in safe cycling infrastructure etc, I think we could achieve way more than this.
Make it safe and they will come !!!!!
Edit: Link to price info included
- Comedian
- Posts: 9166
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby Comedian » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:09 am
Look I agree with you to a point. If we had super safe facilities from most parts of the city then yes commuting could be a really big thing.Rhubarb wrote:Public Transport in Brisbane went up 15% yesterday and according to their website, will go up a further 15% in 2013 and 2014.
ref: http://translink.com.au/tickets-and-far ... nned-fares
So 2 years from now a zone 4 bus trip (eg from my home to cbd) will cost $3,000 per year (48 weeks working minus 5 public hols = 470 trips (AT) $6.32 each).
So getting back to my original premise, I think factors such as this would see the cycle commuting rates increase to 5% within 15 years without any other significant government investment.
Combined with govt investment in safe cycling infrastructure etc, I think we could achieve way more than this.
Make it safe and they will come !!!!!
Edit: Link to price info included
However with what we have now I agree that this kind of thing will increase the numbers of commuters... but even if it doubled current numbers it is still only a tiny drop in the bucket. To cycle now people have to be hardy.
The reality is people don't want to play with cars on a bike - and Australians have become lazy too. We're going to have to plonk a-grade infrastructure in front of people and make the alternatives hideous for people to get back on their bikes in numbers - IMHO. Oh well... their loss.
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:34 am
Brisbanes New Cycle Strategy
Postby themerlin » Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:35 pm
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.