Cadence....discuss
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby mikesbytes » Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:41 pm
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby brentono » Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:41 pm
Even pressure through 360degrees, maintained at high cadence (120+) with ease.
Only one way as C.O.N.I and Keirin School have taught InPerpetua.
Begin correctly, small gears fixed, and do a lot of revolutions, for a lot of km's.
To learn to pedal correctly from the beginning is an Art.
Once you have learnt to pedal correctly you can maintain high cadence with ease.
It's as simple or as hard as that.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby mikesbytes » Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:12 am
- Ross
- Posts: 5742
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Ross » Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:40 am
So to summarise...fast cadence (100 rpm plus) isn't neccessarily good/better, the ideal cadence is whatever you are comfortable with, some like 100+, some like 70, some like 80?
The slow twitch/fast twitch muscle discussion was intertesting too. So, the summary of that was you can train to have more of one type than another, your body will adapt, it's not just "how you are"?
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:06 pm
Yes, and train in a way that is specific to the demands of your goal events.Ross wrote:So to summarise...fast cadence (100 rpm plus) isn't neccessarily good/better, the ideal cadence is whatever you are comfortable with, some like 100+, some like 70, some like 80?
Not quite. You are born with your mix of FT/ST, you can't create FT fibres if you don't already have them naturally (e.g. sprinters are born that way, you can't create a sprinter from a ST dominant animal). You can however gradually "teach" FT fibres (if you have them) to take on some ST properties with sufficient volume of training over a long time.Ross wrote:The slow twitch/fast twitch muscle discussion was intertesting too. So, the summary of that was you can train to have more of one type than another, your body will adapt, it's not just "how you are"?
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby PawPaw » Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:27 pm
We have a 72 yo racing vet who trains with us, and I've seen him sit on 45kph for at least a minute, and sprint over 50. I've never seen him spin more than ~100rpm, despite his room full of national and state wins.
- ft_critical
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: watching the 11
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby ft_critical » Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:00 pm
http://www.flammerouge.je/content/3_fac ... adence.htm
Noting that it is a 'fact'sheet too please....
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby brentono » Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:53 pm
Lot of 20 yo riders with 50 year old knees (whining about it, and can't work it out) on this site,
from slogging big gears.
Ft_critcal a lot of familiar points made in that linked article. +1
Seems it's back to basics for many, and start learning how to pedal correctly. Just a thought.
-
- Posts: 10330
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Nobody » Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:01 pm
Thanks for posting. Interesting read. I may give it a go to see. Have you measured any gain in following it?ft_critical wrote:Bernard Hinault, Marc Gomez and Eddy Merckx are all personal acquaintances of the author's wife, so unless Alex's Mum is a friend of Lance, then it looks like the below is a win for the cadence camp:
http://www.flammerouge.je/content/3_fac ... adence.htm
Noting that it is a 'fact'sheet too please....
- ft_critical
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: watching the 11
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby ft_critical » Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:52 pm
Change pace quickly in the bunch, not let gaps open, go round slower riders - with ease.
I find that I can spin up hills more easiliy, the more I practice. (to be honest I am interested to see how this will net out with the big gear/low cadence hill efforts I am going to begin next week)
I can't say if it helps my sprint
This is embarassing. But I am haunted by this Paul Sherwin expression, 'as long as they stay supple [on the climb, at the end of the race etc]) I didn't really know what that meant, but I do now. It is about staying relaxed during the pedaling cycle and never over utilising one muscle group. My tendancy is to drive down too far on the front stroke. But practicing high cadence forces you to have better balance in the whole cycle. You can't overutilise because then you bounce or just tire out a muscle.
One of the great things about cadence is you can do it as a recovery ride on the trainer. I have two one hour sessions that I do pretty regularly. Obviously I am blasting away on the 39/23.
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:04 pm
Shame it doesn't have much in the way of facts then. Plenty of factual errors, myths and logical fallacies though.ft_critical wrote:Bernard Hinault, Marc Gomez and Eddy Merckx are all personal acquaintances of the author's wife, so unless Alex's Mum is a friend of Lance, then it looks like the below is a win for the cadence camp:
http://www.flammerouge.je/content/3_fac ... adence.htm
Noting that it is a 'fact'sheet too please....
And leave my Mum out of this. I find such a reference offensive.
- ft_critical
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: watching the 11
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby ft_critical » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:12 pm
I think that is a bit of an over-reaction as it was clearly said in jest. However, sorry that you were offended as it was not my intention to offend you.Alex Simmons/RST wrote:And leave my Mum out of this. I find such a reference offensive.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby PawPaw » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:22 pm
-
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:35 am
- Location: Earlwood
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby vander » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:35 pm
How much was the fit?PawPaw wrote:I had a retul bike fit a few weeks ago. My seat was brought down considerably, and my knee angle in extension is now 42 deg. The saddle feels too low, but I noticed immediately I could spin an extra 15rpm without bouncing. I can also cruise in the 90s much more comfortably now, and 100s for 10-15 minutes, and efforts in the 110s. I used to bounce around 110-115 but now it's 125-130. My top speed jumped 3kph within a week.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby PawPaw » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:57 pm
$300 for three hours, though it will be a business expense.vander wrote:How much was the fit?PawPaw wrote:I had a retul bike fit a few weeks ago. My seat was brought down considerably, and my knee angle in extension is now 42 deg. The saddle feels too low, but I noticed immediately I could spin an extra 15rpm without bouncing. I can also cruise in the 90s much more comfortably now, and 100s for 10-15 minutes, and efforts in the 110s. I used to bounce around 110-115 but now it's 125-130. My top speed jumped 3kph within a week.
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby brentono » Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:11 pm
- Alex Simmons/RST
- Expert
- Posts: 4997
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun Feb 05, 2012 3:43 pm
It's not entirely correct though, "but a good effort - yeah".brentono wrote:Seems pretty factual in the muscle groups used in one correct pedal stroke
I'll leave it to others to work it out. I'm done here.
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby brentono » Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:14 pm
Which should give those interested in trying, a better idea, of the motion, and muscles groups used,
while trying to achieve a perfect pedal stroke.
All the best, it may mean back to basics, and smaller (fixed?) gears, to achieve it, folks.
Up your Cadence.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby mikesbytes » Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:28 pm
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby brentono » Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:26 am
- twizzle
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:45 am
- Location: Highlands of Wales.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby twizzle » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:53 pm
I've always wondered about the 'perfect circle', 'one legged drills' etc., but I think AS is correct in that it's all about pushing the pedal harder. Given that hip flexors pull on the lower spine (back pain) and have little endurance... probably better to not try and turn circles.
The biggest benefit I've found to my endurance is in making sure I'm not favoring one leg. A lot of people discovered when they do step-ups that one leg is weaker than the other, and I can now 'generally' tell when I'm not putting equal pressure on the pedals, but it took some time to learn how it should 'feel'.
I'm sure there are some benefits to be gained from having an efficient pedal stroke, but I no longer think that efficiency has anything to do with "perfect circles", "even pressure" etc., as it is impossible to do given the relative size differences of various muscle groups.
That being said, Steve Hogg pointed out to me that my pedal stroke gets very messy at 'high' cadence... which for me is anything higher than 100. So I need to do more high-cadence work to get my brain/muscles working together.
...real cyclists don't have squeaky chains...
- ft_critical
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: watching the 11
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby ft_critical » Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:18 pm
I don't think it's circles, maybe that is where some of the confusion is. It is migrating from stomping to peanuts to sausages. Not a circle. A guy at work was just telling me that Velofix (bike store who do spin classes etc.) have an application that shows you the picture of how you are pedalling. I think they use Wattbikes.twizzle wrote:I've always wondered about the 'perfect circle', 'one legged drills' etc., but I think AS is correct in that it's all about pushing the pedal harder. Given that hip flexors pull on the lower spine (back pain) and have little endurance... probably better to not try and turn circles.
https://wattbike.com/us/guide/cycling_t ... hapes_mean
- brentono
- Posts: 3698
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm
- Location: Perth DubyaEh.
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby brentono » Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:46 pm
What has come to light through this discussion, recent research, and my own experience
is that smooth consistent power maintained at higher cadence requires specific training
of mind and body.
As when you are competing in a cycle race, your brain controls your balance (subconsciously)
and in the same way, the brain subconsciously controls how the muscle groups work during your
pedal action. (earlier in this discussions, I pointed out how "bad habits" become ingrained subconciously)
This is why in "old-school" disciplines like C.O.N.I. and Keirin School, early development (novices) of
correct pedalling techniques are taught (by the use of smaller fixed gears and higher cadence training)
Once you learn to pedal "correctly" and it is ingrained in the subconcious (through constant repetition)
it becomes as natural as maintaining your balance during competition.
This is even more apparent to Track riders, whose bodies subconsciously adapt to balance control while
negotiating Velodromes. Same for subconscious muscle groups actions while pedalling under varied
centrifugal forces while on the Velodrome. The brain training is as important as the body training.
Hope that helps those who wish to be better informed.
P.S. Pedaling in a simple circle is a complex thing. Maintaining even power in both legs
during one pedal cycle and mastering it can save energy. Haven't even talked "proper ankling"
which is the raising and lowering of the heel, during each pedal cycle, mastering it can gain power.
- foo on patrol
- Posts: 9057
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:12 am
- Location: Sanstone Point QLD
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby foo on patrol » Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:33 pm
it becomes second nature.
Foo
Goal 6000km
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22179
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Cadence....discuss
Postby mikesbytes » Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:29 pm
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.