Helmets vs Demographics?

Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 1:11 am
Location: WA

Helmets vs Demographics?

Postby Downhill » Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:35 am

Recently I noticed that the proportion of cyclists not wearing helmets appears to be higher in working class suburbs than in more affluent areas. Is this an accurate observation? Has anyone else noticed the same thing?

And no, this is NOTa "pro" helmet vs "anti" helmet thread, so let's not turn it into one. I'm more interested in the relationship between cultural demographics and cycling safety. If the assumption is correct, then it raises a few questions. For example, is the age of cyclists in less advantaged areas much lower? Are there more cyclists per head of population? Is there less cycling education? Is cycling safety a lower priority? Is not wearing a helmet simply the norm? Is cost a factor? Does cycling infrastructure play a part?

So the real questions are: (a) Does the number of cyclists wearing helmets vary by demographic, and (b) if so, why?
Today's effort = Tomorrows reward.
2010 Oppy C6

you cannot be sirrus
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:33 pm

Re: Helmets vs Demographics?

Postby you cannot be sirrus » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:22 am

Never observed that but why would you assume someone riding in a "working class suburb" is from that suburb (or vice versa) and not simply someone from Toorak (as an example) riding through to somewhere else.
Kuota Kharma,Fuji Altamira, Scott Foil, mongrel of an Orbea TT bike and an MTB thingy.

User avatar
Posts: 5447
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Helmets vs Demographics?

Postby Comedian » Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:54 am

Interesting observation. I'm not sure it's universal though. I believe the Gold Coast has quite a bit of "Helmet Freedom" and it is not normally regarded as a poor area.

User avatar
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 18837
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney

Re: Helmets vs Demographics?

Postby mikesbytes » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:00 am

[mod]Please use the helmet thread[/mod]
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cosh