Complete checkup
The information / discussion in the Cycling Health Forum is not qualified medical advice. Please consult your doctor.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:31 pm
Complete checkup
Postby takeitasread » Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:36 pm
OK, so it's a new year and I want to get a complete physical checkup (at Mrs Takeit's request). Sadly I'm just on the wrong side of 50 and don't have a GP. Can anyone suggest - through personal experience - of a good doctor who can do a complete checkup? I'm in Melbourne, work in the CBD and live in the inner eastern suburbs.
Any assistance would be most appreciated.
Thanks
- Addictr3
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 3:26 pm
- Location: Manly, Sydney
Re: Complete checkup
Postby Addictr3 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:30 pm
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:17 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Complete checkup
Postby sonj » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:59 pm
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:32 pm
- Location: Perth
Re: Complete checkup
Postby triangle » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:27 am
Depends on your doctor but a really thorough check up should involve measuring your blood pressure, stethoscope listen for heart murmurs and lung function plus blood tests for liver function, renal function, cholesterol and blood glucose (fasting for these two). Depending on your age, weight and lifestyle factors like drinking, smoking and exercise (and your doctor's thoroughness) you may also get an ECG. The blood tests, blood pressure reading, age and yes/no smoking are often then used to conduct a coronary risk assessment which just involves plugging some values into an online calculator that calculates your risk of heart attack. Depending on the outcomes of that calculation and/or individual results, there may be more tests.sonj wrote:As an aside, I would love to know what a 'complete checkup' entails. My last few years included a token BP reading, brief attacks with a stethoscope and if lucky a few whacks to the knee with a hammer, and some lifestyle/general 'is there anthing you're worried about' questions. And this was worth a double appointment? Am a complete noob when navigating medical services, as an insofar fortunate lifetime avoider of scablifters
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Complete checkup
Postby sogood » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:53 am
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
-
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:28 pm
- Location: Pikey, based on Southern Gold Coast
Re: Complete checkup
Postby Ken Ho » Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:13 pm
PSA is something to consider, but is not a "gold standard" test. That said, I do pick up prostate cancer by doing it, so it's not a bad idea, just needs to be done thoughtfully.
BP, cholesterol, and waist measurement are important. I assume you don't smoke as you are interested in your health.
Skin cancer check is also a very good idea too, as is glaucoma screening. Like bowel cancer, glaucoma sneaks up on you and early detection makes all the difference.
Iron studies and vitamin D levels also, as issues with both are common. Too much one, not enough of the other.
-
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 2:46 pm
- Location: Melb - Werribee - City
Re: Complete checkup
Postby malnar » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:34 am
The blood testing was a full blood examination including a prostate test.
At the second appt he was working through a template (?Fed Gov't) & he did BP, height & weight, lifestyle questionnaire, stephoscope, pulpaption and an ECG. I thought he was going to do a prostate check but apparently the blood test covered that off.
All bulk billed. Very impressed.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Complete checkup
Postby PawPaw » Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:02 am
Would several tests over 1-2 months improve this % significantly?
I also understand these tests do not unmask predilection to myocardial infarct, presumably because coronary artery blockages do not correlate strongly with abnormal rhythms.
I'm very curious about this stuff and if anyone can recommend reading sources, would appreciate it. I've socialized with several cardiologists in the past and their views on intense effort over the age of 45 varies tremendously.
-
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:28 pm
- Location: Pikey, based on Southern Gold Coast
Re: Complete checkup
Postby Ken Ho » Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:53 pm
Exercise stress testing carries a high enough false positive rate, that it is not considered to be a good idea to use it to screen asymptomatic people. This is because a positive result will be followed by angiography, which is b expensive and invasive
Some insurance companies will require an ETT before insuring older clients who may be borrowing a lot of money, for example, because a negative result is quite re-assuring.
Now, about cardiologists. They mostly believe in studies. Studies are all about drugs, and to a lesser extent interventional procedures. There have been a ton of studies done that prove significant benefit from lowering blood pressure and cholesterol in particular for prevention and similar things as well as controlling heart rate for people with established IHD both befo and after myocardial infarction. So, that's what they focus on. Basically, even if you are a fat diabetic slob, if you take your pills, which people will actually do, you'll do OK. There is not the same weight of evidence supporting diet and exercise, and it's harder to get people to do it.
Now I would argue that taking your pills and fixing your numbers is not the same as being healthy, but "health". Is a fuzzy concept.
I would postulate that a cardiologist's views on vigorous exercise will be informed by their own lifestyle. A sedentary doctor will be unlikely to strongly advocate exercise, whereas one who can cruise a half-iron will be keener. I think that's where the inconsistency arises. Remember, medicine is a sedentary desk job.
Regardless, I can assure that there is no quicker way to piss people off than to suggest they need to lose weight and/or exercise, even if they are obviously suffering the ill effects of morbid obesity.
There have been studies proving that patients with severe heart failure live longer and do better if they do weight training.
In the over 45, the safety of high heart rate exercise will vary between individuals, depending on how well they have lived, and if they have crap arteries.
- PawPaw
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Complete checkup
Postby PawPaw » Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:30 pm
Some of the studies and hospital staff kitchen conversation I've heard recently is arrhythmia is a growing issue amongst middle aged westerners, and some are blaming intense exercise.
My feeling is yes it might be a growing issue due to
- demographics (boomer spike and increased comorbidity amongst frugals)
- higher rate of overweight and obesity
- higher rate of uptake of high intensity exercise and crash dieting amongst boomers and X'ers.
Personally, I see too many middle aged folk try and replicate the Biggest Loser experience, and take advice from a personal trainer who did an 8 week course, or some buff Cross Fit forum guru..... It would seem intense exercise such as on that show should be gradually progressed towards only after significant weight has been stripped.
I suppose my intuitive feeling is an aging body has an aging cardiovascular and neural system, and therefore, it is possible intense efforts are more likely to unmask or over stress those systems. I suppose there's a balance to be had, which might be more closely followed by listening intently to our intuition and internal feedback.but it seems everyone wants quantifiable responses from doctors more.
-
- Posts: 1299
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:28 pm
- Location: Pikey, based on Southern Gold Coast
Re: Complete checkup
Postby Ken Ho » Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:30 pm
Age is no doubt a contributor, but caffeine from the many sources it comes form is probably a significant factor as well
Your comment "internal feedback" is pretty important. I tend to listen to my body, and while I do push long and hard at times, I'm always paying attention to myself. I don't measure my heart rate, and I am not really a fan of deliberately pushing heart rate during exercise.
There is no dispute that faster heart rates increase oxygen demand while reducing supply. The heart can only perfuse itself during diastole, so increased rates always lead to a reduction in perfusion.
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Complete checkup
Postby wombatK » Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:02 pm
You might find some insights from this DocMikeEvans presentation (warning: it's 23 Mbytes)PawPaw wrote: I suppose my intuitive feeling is an aging body has an aging cardiovascular and neural system, and therefore, it is possible intense efforts are more likely to unmask or over stress those systems. I suppose there's a balance to be had, which might be more closely followed by listening intently to our intuition and internal feedback.but it seems everyone wants quantifiable responses from doctors more.
About 7 minutes in, he mentions a German Researcher Rainer Hambrecht who looked at the effectiveness of exercise compared with stenting as a treatment for 107 patients with coronary blockages in 2004 (see Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Compared With Exercise Training in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease).
Half the patients got 20 minutes a day on an exercise bike, plus once a week 60 min aerobics class; 88% of these were event free one year later. The other half got stents, and only 70% of these were event free one year later. The low-tech exercise treatment worked on the whole body - the stent fixes just one part; if you read the study article, the exercisers got numerous other benefits.
It's not a big study, but the result ought to have people reaching for the low-tech answers before surgical big-guns are
brought to bear.
Hambrecht's study can probably also give you an indication of what is "safe" - 20 minutes per day, with a 180 minute weekly total is safe. There's probably quite a margin between this and the marathon-running territory where you might have to worry about
your ability to recover from the cardiac damage over-exertion can cause.
Cheers
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Complete checkup
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:45 pm
Depends. There are also many specialties in medicine (used generically) that's tough both mentally and physically, a far cry from a sedentary desk job.Ken Ho wrote:Remember, medicine is a sedentary desk job...
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Complete checkup
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:48 pm
Without digging into the specific selection criteria, I would want both if I have critical a stenosis that deserves a PTCA+stent!wombatK wrote:Half the patients got 20 minutes a day on an exercise bike, plus once a week 60 min aerobics class; 88% of these were event free one year later. The other half got stents, and only 70% of these were event free one year later. The low-tech exercise treatment worked on the whole body - the stent fixes just one part; if you read the study article, the exercisers got numerous other benefits.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.