Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby find_bruce » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:59 pm

There must be something special in the water at BNSW HQ- the latest email came addressed to "Dear First Name".

Sure it's a simple mistake, but it doesn't fill you with confidence re their organizational abilities.
Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 3777
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

by BNA » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:50 am

BNA
 

Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby Boognoss » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:50 am

I wouldn't hold a mail merge issue against them. Mail merge is a pain :-)

Until Alex Unwin disappears they'll not see my coin again though.


Cheers, Simon

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2011ish Avanti Quantum (DIY), 2010 Specialized Tricross, 2010 Salsa Casseroll

Image
User avatar
Boognoss
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 5808
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:45 am
Location: Castle Hill, NSW

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby CommuRider » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:08 am

find_bruce wrote:There must be something special in the water at BNSW HQ- the latest email came addressed to "Dear First Name".


Shows how valuable you are as a member.

At least they didn't cc every member.
Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
User avatar
CommuRider
 
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby Ozkaban » Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:25 am

Boognoss wrote:I wouldn't hold a mail merge issue against them. Mail merge is a pain :-)

+1

The best one I heard of was a job applicant receiving an empty email back with an attachment "reject applicant.doc". Not really necessary to open that one :?

Boognoss wrote:Until Alex Unwin disappears they'll not see my coin again though.

+2
Ozkaban
 
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:18 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby ghop0man » Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:37 pm

As an ex-member Dear First Name convinced me I had made the right decision in becoming an 'ex'
User avatar
ghop0man
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:15 am
Location: Loftus, Sydney,

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby hannos » Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:29 am

Well they haven't updated their facebook page since tghe 23rd january and I haven't heard them mentioned in any news or current affairs since Omar left...
What are they doing?



I'm moving to BSA when my membership expires.
2010 BMC SLC01
Image
User avatar
hannos
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:18 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby sogood » Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:36 am

Fragmentation of the cycling community in NSW will just further weaken any lobbying position for the cause. Get involved and not desert may be the better strategy. United we stand... How can anyone influence the board and management when one is not a member?
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16968
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby thomashouseman » Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:14 pm

hannos wrote:I'm moving to BSA when my membership expires.


+1
thomashouseman
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:07 am
Location: Toongabbie NSW

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby find_bruce » Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:50 pm

sogood wrote:Fragmentation of the cycling community in NSW will just further weaken any lobbying position for the cause. Get involved and not desert may be the better strategy. United we stand... How can anyone influence the board and management when one is not a member?

I despertely want to agree with you. All it would take is some evidence that BNSW was lobbying for the cause & I would support them.

I sent the membership address an email last Wednesday outling my concerns. Next day I got a reply saying my email had been forwarded to Alex Uniwin. What I have got from the panther is nothing. I don't expect a quick response, after all BFV was told to wait 9 months to find out.

What the debacle of the last AGM demonstrated is that the constitution is set up to resist change - special majority of 75% required to carry resolutions, only 6 board members elected by the membership, 2 per year to 3 year terms. The other 3 are appointed by the board, again to 3 year terms.

If you want to have a laugh, in their reasons for not posting the complete documentation of the resolution proposal at the lat AGM, the Board response was
BNSW Board wrote:This situation has led the Board to look at the way we communicate with the BUG Council and the membership more widely. This will be a major priority for us going forward and we’d like to see much more interaction, consistent with the separation of responsibilities between the Executive and the Board

They've done a great job of that haven't they :roll:
Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 3777
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Bicycle NSW fail to meet low standards

Postby CommuRider » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:30 am

"going forward"

Again?

:roll:

Btw, am now on CA's mailing list and their newsletters strike me as relevant. Any chance they could do a takeover of BNSW? The only good thing about BNSW is their HQ is in SOP.
Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
User avatar
CommuRider
 
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Sydney


Return to New South Wales

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit
cron