Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby CommuRider » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:26 am

They just hate Clover or they really are a self-centred bunch. Guess this is why the attitude of the road is king filter down to some members

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/pedestrians-w ... 1t47d.html

But the president of the NRMA, Wendy Machin, sounded a cautious note: "Sydney is owned by all the people of NSW and in fact Australia. Decisions made on how traffic moves in and around the CBD should not be undertaken only by Sydney City Council but should involve all levels of government and key stakeholders.'


How many more roads and tunnels does the NRMA want in the city?
Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
User avatar
CommuRider
 
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Sydney

by BNA » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:29 am

BNA
 

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby AndrewBurns » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:29 am

Good move by the city council, I love the way the lanes work around the Melbourne CBD. Frankly I don't like any private cars in Sydney CBD, I don't think they have any place being there. I'd prefer to see the CBD become an exclusive bike/pedestrian/public transport zone.
Image
AndrewBurns
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:36 pm

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby hewey » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:10 am

The NRMA is an advocacy group for motorists, like any special interest group they're going to bitch and whinge if anything looks to impinge on 'their' turf :roll:

I went to a presentation by City of Sydney planners a year or two back and they have some really interesting ideas and plans in the works. As they said, even if someone drives to work in the CBD, they typically park in a carpark, walk to their office, walk to get lunch, and walk back to their car at the end of the day. Thus even though they drive to work they actually spend more time as a pedestrian in the CBD than as a motorist! This obviously doesnt include all of the people who ride or catch public transport to get to work (which is obviously a LOT of people), and then on top of that you have tourists etc as well. The motorist is in the minority, and they have a duty of care to make the city safe for pedestrians, as well as improving the quality of experience for the pedestrians using this area. Also even if they 100% beleived that they needed to get more cars into the CBD, where the hell are they going to fit? Bridges and tunnels aren't cheap! As I said, they're thinking long term and have some very interesting ideas floating around. Cars have reached critical mass in the city so now we've got to look at other ideas to move forwards.
hewey
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:29 pm

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby find_bruce » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:07 am

Sheesh when are people going to realise that the simple solution to traffic congestion is to build more roads. :shock:

Sarcasm aside, is Ms Machlin really that stupid that she does not understand that Sydney City Council are not the only ones making the decision - as noted by the SMH, the closures have to be approved by Roads and Maritime Services, who apparently are going to "assess the council's application for each laneway case by case". Has she actually looked at the lanes they are talking about ? :roll:

Both the lanes mentioned in the article, Temperance Lane & Lees Court, are so small (and go nowhere) that Google didn't send their street view car down them. 10 kph is about the right speed for a hundred meters or so of laneway that goes nowhere.

There is more information including a map of the laneways on the City of Sydney Website

CommuRider wrote:They just hate Clover or they really are a self-centred bunch.

Are those altneratives - I thought both were true.

Maybe it's my perverse sense of humour, but I like the idea of a bar in Temperance Lane.
Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby CommuRider » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:09 am

find_bruce wrote:Maybe it's my perverse sense of humour, but I like the idea of a bar in Temperance Lane.


Not at all perverted. Totally appropriate! If we can get a bit more of Melbourne's laneway scene, all the better.
Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
User avatar
CommuRider
 
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby longshanks » Wed Feb 15, 2012 2:43 pm

CommuRider wrote:"Sydney is owned by all the people of NSW and in fact Australia. Decisions made on how traffic moves in and around the CBD should not be undertaken only by Sydney City Council but should involve all levels of government and key stakeholders.'


So using Wendys logic, if the city of Perth wants to make some road and laneway changes then i should be consulted...

:roll:
longshanks
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby Kraeg » Wed Feb 15, 2012 2:52 pm

I like the 10 km/h limit for cars so long as there is room to pass them.
Kraeg
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:11 pm

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby CommuRider » Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:44 pm

longshanks wrote:
CommuRider wrote:"Sydney is owned by all the people of NSW and in fact Australia. Decisions made on how traffic moves in and around the CBD should not be undertaken only by Sydney City Council but should involve all levels of government and key stakeholders.'


So using Wendys logic, if the city of Perth wants to make some road and laneway changes then i should be consulted...

:roll:


The NRMA has just extended their empire-building by being the voice of Australia :lol:
Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
User avatar
CommuRider
 
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Typical NRMA attitude towards pedestrian-friendly city

Postby gorilla monsoon » Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:47 am

NRMA = No Real Mechanics Available. No real interest in anything other than its own agenda either, obviously.

Still, NRMA actually does stand for National Roads and Motorists Association so maybe Wendy is trying to make this silly organisation live up to the charter suggested by its name.
Some days you are a big, strutting rooster, some days you are a bit chicken and some days you are just a complete cocque. Roger Ramjet: 2009 Giant CRX3 Spockette: 2009 Trek FX 7.3 (WSD, property of Mrs Monsoon) Lady Penelope: 2011 Avanti Cadent 1.0 TdF
User avatar
gorilla monsoon
 
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:45 am
Location: Central Coast/Lake Macquarie


Return to New South Wales

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Support BNA
Click for online shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Cycling Express Cycling Express
Ebay Ebay AU
ProBikeKit ProBikeKit UK
Evans Cycles Evans Cycles UK
JensonUSA Jenson USA
JensonUSA Competitive Cyclist