Two wheels beats four
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Two wheels beats four
Postby wombatK » Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:58 am
Link for non-mobile PCs
Two wheels beats four in race to Parramatta
So who could beat the trains 50 min ? Cyclists 80 min was rank amateur, this croaky 59 yo could beat it. Tele should stop bashing and start supporting cyclists.
Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk, edited on PC to add PC link
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:49 pm
- Location: Kings Langley
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby Thunderthighs » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:04 am
What route did the bloke take? Has he not heard of the cycle path along the M4? He should have done it in an easy 60min...wombatK wrote:http://m.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/syd ... 2630088984
So who could beat the trains 50 min ? Cyclists 80 min was rank amateur, this croaky 59 yo could beat it. Tele should stop bashing and start supporting cyclists.
Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 10316
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby Nobody » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:10 am
It's the Daily Terror, what did you expect?wombatK wrote:Tele should stop bashing and start supporting cyclists.
-
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:36 pm
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby AndrewBurns » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:15 am
- Sweeper59
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:37 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby Sweeper59 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:43 am
Nobody looks back on their life....and remembers the nights they got plenty of sleep !!
-
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:36 pm
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby AndrewBurns » Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:47 am
It does actually mention him being cut off dangerously by busses twiceSweeper59 wrote:The story doesn't say how many times the bike rider was abused by motorists, how many objects were thrown, or how many near misses he had.
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- goneriding
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:14 pm
- Location: Strathfield
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby goneriding » Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:28 am
Perhaps look at establishing car/cycle parking at ferry terminals for those who are coming from further out West into the CBD. The ferry terminal at Homebush has the ability to cater for both and has the potential to be significantly expanded.
More roads only ever leads to more cars and at some point there is a bottleneck.
- familyguy
- Posts: 8365
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:30 pm
- Location: Willoughby, NSW
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby familyguy » Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:59 am
BUILD MORE RIVERS!JV911 wrote:telegraph's response: BUILD MORE ROADS DAMMINT
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby sogood » Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:57 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- CommuRider
- Posts: 5053
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby CommuRider » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:03 pm
Again the NRMA is out there promoting more roads...and where is our state group supposed advocate of bike infrastructure to counter the NRMA's rampant traffic promotion? Oh yes, nowhere. The silence says it all.
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby JV911 » Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:36 pm
let's start by not cancelling ferry services like they did last year! i used to occasionally catch the ferry from birkenhead to/from work in the city...it was so peacefulgoneriding wrote:surely logic dictates that better use of the waterway to Parramatta along with connecting services is really one of the few options left available.
- goneriding
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:14 pm
- Location: Strathfield
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby goneriding » Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:54 pm
They probably did release a statement but no-one listened Oops! Silly me! Just checked - nothing!CommuRider wrote:Bad GPS. The cyclist could have taken the Parra river cycleway and arrived at Parramatta in no time and without having to deal with the trucks.
Again the NRMA is out there promoting more roads...and where is our state group supposed advocate of bike infrastructure to counter the NRMA's rampant traffic promotion? Oh yes, nowhere. The silence says it all.
As I said, it is all well and good to promote more roads but where are they going to put them? There isn't anywhere you can expand the road network close to the CBD without starting to reclaim private land as far as I know. Making changes further out just move the current carpark!
- biker jk
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby biker jk » Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:29 pm
The state government believes tunnels are the answer! Imagine the billions that will be wasted building them and to no benefit. Meanwhile, motorists complain about spending a few million on cycling infrastructure which both reduces traffic congestion and obesity.goneriding wrote:They probably did release a statement but no-one listened Oops! Silly me! Just checked - nothing!CommuRider wrote:Bad GPS. The cyclist could have taken the Parra river cycleway and arrived at Parramatta in no time and without having to deal with the trucks.
Again the NRMA is out there promoting more roads...and where is our state group supposed advocate of bike infrastructure to counter the NRMA's rampant traffic promotion? Oh yes, nowhere. The silence says it all.
As I said, it is all well and good to promote more roads but where are they going to put them? There isn't anywhere you can expand the road network close to the CBD without starting to reclaim private land as far as I know. Making changes further out just move the current carpark!
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby wombatK » Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:03 pm
The Ferry trip is very pleasant, but Ferry speeds can't (and never will) match train speeds. For people living close to the ferry terminals, and working close to the CBD wharves, they could be an worthwhile. But presently, there's a lot of fairly empty Rivercats running up and down the river in peak hours (at least from my observations at the Rhodes to Rydalmere end of the route).goneriding wrote:Given that they can't put more rolling stock onto the train lines (nor is there any room to expand them) and there isn't anywhere else to put new roads, surely logic dictates that better use of the waterway to Parramatta along with connecting services is really one of the few options left available.
The airport line was built essentially to solve the need for capacity between Tempe and the CBD (the airport stops were a red-herring, and have never proved economic). It achieved that by tunneling - in quite difficult sandy conditions too. Building tunnels for train lines (i.e. subways) is what most major world cities do to solve mass transit problems.
The article also nobbles the train performance. There are express trains from Parramatta that get to/from the CBD in around 20 minutes. The reporter that rode the train wasn't trying real hard either. With a bit of attention to train schedules, someone starting a commute from Parramatta to Strathfield could be able to beat a good cyclist (if they live close enough to the stations).
Unfortunately, the Telegraph is serving the interests of the road lobby. If the past M2 deals are any guide, we are more than likely to end up with an M4 East road tunnel project that has "non-competition" clauses that prevent any government or private sector interests ever building a parallel train line that would very quickly undermine a road tunnel's viability.
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
- Ross
- Posts: 5742
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby Ross » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:10 am
JdeL of West End, Qld Posted at 3:11 AM March 16, 2012
Not only was the bike faster, but the rider burned off some serious calories and is unlikely to to end up a Type 2 Diabetic. Health, speed and zero pollution. Clover Moore is 100% correct we need more bike tracks.
Comment 10 of 122
Cameron Cox of Sydney Posted at 8:45 AM March 16, 2012
Think how much faster (and safer) the cyclist would have been if the whole trip could have been done on separated bike lanes
Comment 18 of 122
Stevie Posted at 9:27 AM March 16, 2012
we need to invest in public transport and cycleways, not roads. with the current obesity epidemic we need more people roding their bikes to work. imagine how much money would be saved on health, and how much less air pollution there would be?
Comment 36 of 122
Harry Miller of Australia Posted at 9:31 AM March 16, 2012
Yes but did the bike run red lights like they usually do
Comment 39 of 122
Brenda of Sydney Posted at 9:50 AM March 16, 2012
I don't understand why the cyclist took the worst route when an offroad pleasant route is available. Think how many cars would be off the road if those single passengers travelling less than 5ks got out and did some exercise on a bike. They would be saving themselves and the community the health care costs they are going to get from their sedentary lifestyle
Comment 49 of 122
Tom of Eastwood Posted at 10:09 AM March 16, 2012
The bike would probably win hands down if you included getting to a typical suburban house in the Parramatta that was not say 10 to 20 mins walk from the station as the bike can go straight there. Also a bit more research would have avoided the ride along Parammatta road. Not to mention the 1 hour plus of "free" exercise.
Comment 60 of 122
matt of Thinker. Posted at 10:45 AM March 16, 2012
I wonder if a 'green' car is actually greener. Considering the mining products that go into the 'green' cells and so forth. What do you do with the batteries when they are dead? Where do we source our electricity? Just putting it out there..
Comment 82 of 122
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:01 pm
The item ended up with the cyclist wining by three minutes and they pointedly observed that the driver was only that close because he drove directly to the agreed end point instead of via his parking station.
However I see that the rider was not required to have a shower and get dressed for work. In fairness I think the driver won if the end point was to be in the office and suited up to work.
The start point was also the worst possible case for the driver as it was just where significant major freeway works are being done and so gridlock sets in earlier than normal. At the same time there is only a two or three minute cost to the rider with detour through Bateman.
I like cycling. I applaud everyone that does it to get to work. It is MY preferred way of getting around. I am on the cyclists side. But as for saving time I have never seen it in four decades of doing it in Perth. Time saved, at least for arriving to work, is not an honest argument for most CBD workers. (Ross itemises a heap of honest reaons. Thanks.)
btw I was disappointed that they did not have a third person taking the train in the Perth trial. I am pretty sure the winner would have been clear, even without requiring the driver to park or the rider to shower and change.
- queequeg
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:09 am
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby queequeg » Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:06 pm
He was a tele journalist....all the participants were!sogood wrote:What a bozo of a cyclist they chose, one who didn't check the route before the ride!
- queequeg
- Posts: 6479
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:09 am
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby queequeg » Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:29 pm
This is often raised as an issue in these "challenges", but one would expect that the driver had to get showered/dressed at home before they left, and would therefore have woken up earlier to do so. That they spend this time before they arrive at work rather than after does not matter. The driver and cyclist do spend the same amount of time so they cancel each other out for the purposes of the challenge.ColinOldnCranky wrote:One of the commerical tv stations did a comparo from Farrington Road south of Perth to the CBD comparing time for a motorist and a driver a couple of weeks ago.
The item ended up with the cyclist wining by three minutes and they pointedly observed that the driver was only that close because he drove directly to the agreed end point instead of via his parking station.
However I see that the rider was not required to have a shower and get dressed for work. In fairness I think the driver won if the end point was to be in the office and suited up to work.
I do agree that the driver should have to go and park their car at their usual location before considering their journey "complete", and if you want the challenge to take into account the showering/dressing times, then the challenge should start with the various commuters waking up in the morning, and should stop when they are seated at their desks ready to go. If i need to in the morning, I can basically wake up, throw on cycling gear and be out the door in 15 minutes.
- hartleymartin
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:56 pm
- Location: Fairfield, NSW
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby hartleymartin » Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:37 pm
When I return to the family home in Fairfield I have separate routes for travelling to and from the station. I take advantage of the long downhill towards the station, where the traffic is slow and so I have never had troubles with drivers (except for a couple who overtook me just to suddenly turn left in front of me!) I have another route which is longer, but quieter and less steep when returning so as to avoid trouble with afternoon commuters.
Of course, I just obtained for myself the most efficient commute to college. I live in the upstairs dormitory wing now. (a la Yehuda Moon)
http://raleightwenty.webs.com - the top web resource for the Raleigh Twenty
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby JV911 » Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:50 am
Tunnels have their place, after all you can't keep building more roads as there is simply not enough room! Same story with bike lanes to some extent.biker jk wrote:The state government believes tunnels are the answer! Imagine the billions that will be wasted building them and to no benefit. Meanwhile, motorists complain about spending a few million on cycling infrastructure which both reduces traffic congestion and obesity.
M4 east is a good example, connecting the M4 and the western distributor. Parra rd is a nightmare and a tunnel would free up space on the surface for bike lanes etc. It could also help reduce pollution as exhaust gas emitted in the tunnel is filtered before being released instead of just coming straight out the tailpipe into the athmosphere.
They should have built the M4 tunnel 15 years ago when they were first talking about it. Now (if it ever happens) it will cost 10 times s much.
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby wombatK » Mon Mar 19, 2012 5:59 pm
The M4 East was planned about the same time as the Western Distributor (i.e. more than 30 years ago)JV911 wrote: They should have built the M4 tunnel 15 years ago when they were first talking about it. Now (if it ever happens) it will cost 10 times s much.
and the M4. It was never meant to dump all the traffic onto Parramatta Rd at Strathfield as its final solution.
By the late 1970's, the RTA had reserved a route for it, and bought many properties. The Wran Government
decided not to build it, and released the properties to the market. I shall leave you to guess who were
the owners of several of the properties real estate agents showed us about this time.
Cheers
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
- JV911
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby JV911 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:55 am
30 years? well there you gowombatK wrote:The M4 East was planned about the same time as the Western Distributor (i.e. more than 30 years ago)
sort of off topic but it's the same deal with the 2nd airport...should have been done when the MANS Study was conducted in the 70s. Now it will never happen
-
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby zero » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:52 pm
Traffic is entirely caused by single occupant cars. Essentially this is a reverse luxury tax on people that do not participate in the madness, because we still have to fund this stupidity out of general tax.JV911 wrote:Tunnels have their place, after all you can't keep building more roads as there is simply not enough room! Same story with bike lanes to some extent.biker jk wrote:The state government believes tunnels are the answer! Imagine the billions that will be wasted building them and to no benefit. Meanwhile, motorists complain about spending a few million on cycling infrastructure which both reduces traffic congestion and obesity.
The Western Distributor cannot generate or absorb more traffic. It shares the same bridge with Victoria Rd. ie there is no space to route more traffic to it or extract more traffic from the city. Ever destined to repeat the same mistake.
M4 east is a good example, connecting the M4 and the western distributor. Parra rd is a nightmare and a tunnel would free up space on the surface for bike lanes etc. It could also help reduce pollution as exhaust gas emitted in the tunnel is filtered before being released instead of just coming straight out the tailpipe into the athmosphere.
They should have built the M4 tunnel 15 years ago when they were first talking about it. Now (if it ever happens) it will cost 10 times s much.
I also increasingly resent the concept of paying tax to build these things, and finding there is not parallel fast cycle infrastructure - all of the major tunnels in Sydney ban cycles, and none of them have anything that actually facilitates a fast journey in parallel on a cycle.
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Two wheels beats four
Postby wombatK » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:13 pm
FWIW, the M5 East Tunnel was to have a cycleway alongside Wolli Creek - RTA got to an advanced planning stages. But oppositionzero wrote: I also increasingly resent the concept of paying tax to build these things, and finding there is not parallel fast cycle infrastructure - all of the major tunnels in Sydney ban cycles, and none of them have anything that actually facilitates a fast journey in parallel on a cycle.
from tree-huggers in the Bardwell Park area put a stop to it. Talk about Pyrric Victory - couldn't stop the car tunnel, but dammit,
they were gonna make sure they stopped somethin: the environment friendliest option.
Bourke St cycleway was meant to be the counter measure to the Eastern Distributor/Airport Motorway, and very
nice plans were included in the Local Traffic Plan for the ED - uni-directional bike lanes on each side of Bourks St.
What has now materialised is a far cry from that - and just look at how ballistic the business interests
have gone over that little.
The Lane Cove Tunnel project included provision of a 3m wide cycleway or a 4m wide shared cycleway/ pedestrian
footpath (intended for pedestrian and pedal bicycle use) from Wicks Road North Ryde to Park Road
Naremburn.
Off course, Park Road Naremburn isn't much of a destination - it's the same-old same-old problem of disconnected cycleways.
For the Harbour Tunnel, the parallel fast cycleway is on the Harbour Bridge. Just don't mention about the steps and lack of
connection up to Park Rd Naremburn etc
Cheers
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.