So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Questions about purchasing bicycles and parts

So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby ldrcycles » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:47 pm

Well my first bike was a Repco 'dual suspension' MTB that cost $120, and it was junk. Gears that never worked properly, brakes that never worked properly, suspension that never worked properly, bearings made of cheese etc.

But walking through Big W the other day i saw a Repco single speed flat bar road bike, and absolutely loved the look of it.
http://www.bigw.com.au/sports-leisure/b ... 000299802/
Now the way a bike looks is one thing, but the way it rides is something else entirely. Life is too short not to know!! So with it costing only $98 (and with a little encouragement from the forum :) ) i pulled the trigger today.

Unfortunately i can't post pics just now but i can at least describe the first few operations.
First impressions, the frame is WAY better than what you would expect. It's a lovely glossy black (although the downtube stickers look to be a bit too far underneath the tube, at least they're there) and i was very surprised to find the welds are actually quite reasonable. I've seen plenty of Huffys, Dunlops etc with disgraceful welds that look like they are barely holding things together, now you would never confuse this for a handmade frame but it's not too bad.

Remembering what i had read about several people buying these kind of bikes and finding them completely ungreased, i decided the first job would be to strip things down and have a look. Started with the front wheel (as it was loose in the box), reasonably true but the bearings were pretty tight and notchy. On opening it up, there was a reasonable but not exactly generous amount of grease. I whacked in some more and adjusted it up so it actually spins fairly smoothly. Was a very quick and easy job too.

On to the rear wheel, it was so tight i could barely move the axle by hand at all. Same story as the front, very quick and easy to regrease and adjust to quite smooth. Very little grease in it though, and the freewheel feels very light and tinny.

The BB was done up extremely tightly, and was very stiff to turn. That's where the story ends for now, as i can't find my BB spanner and need to sleep :) .

But to start off with, things aren't too bad, i'm getting the impression that the assembly on these bikes is more of an issue than the quality of the parts.
Photos and more tomorrow.
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

by BNA » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:31 pm

BNA
 

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby AUbicycles » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:31 pm

Look forward to your updates. For a laugh, and to see what happens, would you be able to take the bike back to Big W and enquire about your first bike service.... and if they can get a mechanic to check eg. A loose pedal.

The other thing is asking for a (non-standard) replacement part. I am interested in the reactions, and what solution is suggested. Apart from the quality, the service and support is the other major criticism of Supermarket bikes and why I don't recommend them..... But things can change.

In the name of science, would you mind posting the specs and also sharing what features were highlighted on the bike (in store or in the ad) if applicable.

Cheers
Christopher
User avatar
AUbicycles
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8901
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
Location: Sydney

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby sblack » Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:59 am

I was in Big W last night, wandered past the bike section, saw the same bike and must admit had similar thoughts. Just how bad could it be for that price? If it wasn't for the fact that I don't live in a particularly single speed friendly area I probably would have bought one just to see.

Incidentally I had a Repco Sport24 10 speed as a kid that seamed just fine. It was my first road bike and after I outgrew it it just sat outside my parents place until one day last year I noticed it and it's now fixed up and is my daughter's first road bike. Works just fine but it is fairly heavy.
Image
User avatar
sblack
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:38 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby rkelsen » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:37 am

I can think of worse ways to blow $100.

In all honesty, I believe that if you grease and adjust the bearings properly and true the wheels it'll last you ages.

At 19 kegs, it'll be built like a brick outhouse.
User avatar
rkelsen
 
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby AndrewBurns » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:52 am

Surely 19kg is gross weight, I can't imagine the net weight would be more than 15 or 16kg.

My Aldi bike is still going strong though not getting much action these days, there was nothing fundamentally wrong with it so as long as I kept maintaining it I could probably expect a few thousand km out of it (current odo is about 800km I think). It was great for teaching me bike maintenance :P
Image
AndrewBurns
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:36 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby silentbutdeadly » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:11 am

It'll be 19kgs without air in the tyres...ask your dad/grandad how heravy his bike was. I'd wager that if you took this bike back 50 years they'd think it was a lightweight...

Well done to LDR for putting his money where his mad ideas were. Look forward to the improvements...especially since Cell make big things of selling fixies for mid $400's
Ours is not to reason why...merely to point and giggle
User avatar
silentbutdeadly
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:52 am
Location: Somewhere flat...

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby AndrewBurns » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:26 am

silentbutdeadly wrote:It'll be 19kgs without air in the tyres...ask your dad/grandad how heravy his bike was. I'd wager that if you took this bike back 50 years they'd think it was a lightweight...

Well done to LDR for putting his money where his mad ideas were. Look forward to the improvements...especially since Cell make big things of selling fixies for mid $400's


I doubt that a bike 50 years ago would have weighed more than 19kg either. The aldi bike is very large, all of the tubes are the size you'd expect from an aluminium bike but they're steel. Not good steel either, something you'd make drain pipes out of and none of them are butted, it has front suspension and a steel suspension seatpost which all add weight. Even then it only weighs a bit over 16kg base weight (18 after I added mudguards and rack), the fixie even though it's made of similar drain pipe steel will be lighter even just because it hasn't got the weight of extra gears and no heavy suspension forks.
Image
AndrewBurns
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:36 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby rkelsen » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:41 am

You can walk into any LBS and easily find a brand new bike which weighs >20kg.
User avatar
rkelsen
 
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby AndrewBurns » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:49 am

rkelsen wrote:You can walk into any LBS and easily find a brand new bike which weighs >20kg.


True but we're not talking some specialty bike or a dutch style bike or e-bike here, it's just a plain fixie. Not much there that can really push the weight up that high unless they made it out of solid instead of tube.
Image
AndrewBurns
 
Posts: 994
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:36 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby rkelsen » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:59 am

Steel cranks can be quite heavy. It can add up pretty quickly if the seatpost, chainring, stem, hubs, handlebars, brakes and brake levers are also steel.

For 98 bucks, I don't think there'd be much alloy on that bike. The rims might be steel too.
Last edited by rkelsen on Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rkelsen
 
Posts: 4281
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby longshanks » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:08 am

As others have posted, its weight was the first thing i saw! Anyway, for $98 you may have a reasonable frame (maybe) if the rest turns out to be rubbish.
longshanks
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby janus77 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:44 am

$98, that's crazy.. nice effort buying one. I'd bet more than half the people reading this thread are tempted to go out and do just the same!
User avatar
janus77
 
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:09 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby yarravalleyplodder » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:59 am

well you can get a mtb from goldcross for $99
http://www.goldcross.com.au/online-stor ... escription

probably a bit better after sales service from them than BigW
2011 Felt F75
2012 Fuji Nevada 2.0
User avatar
yarravalleyplodder
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:55 am
Location: Gateway to the Yarra Valley

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby MattyK » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:09 pm

Looks like they took our advice: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=48301#p734989
MattyK wrote:It amazes me that K-Mart etc don't get into fixies. Surely it would be possible to produce a good value single-speed at low cost? It would be simple enough that parts could be upgraded if they break, which they probably would. But it would be reasonably pleasant to ride with efficient drivetrain and skinny tyres.

silentbutdeadly wrote:Except it would probably be based on a frame made from downgrade steel fence railings and therefore weigh as much as a 10 foot Waratah farm gate.
MattyK
 
Posts: 1313
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:07 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby brisrouleur » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:19 pm

Okay, so I know someone else who bought one of these the day they were advertised in the BigW catalogue. In fact, I'm looking at the bike from within the office now...

The funny thing is about this purchase, is he's already got a list of parts ready to order from Wiggle/Chain Reaction to the order of $300. To be fair to the bike though, despite some of it's low points on quality of parts which affect the pleasure of riding it, in all reality it would probably keep rolling for quite some time.

The main comment from his experience with the bike would be the brakes have been near useless. Probably a combination of painted rims and bad pads, but they have made some improvement over the last few weeks. Also the way the seat is bolted to the post, the bolt/nut catches his knicks and has caused a little bit of wear in them.
brisrouleur
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:36 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby brisrouleur » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:26 pm

Oh, and if you like new bike smell. This one also comes with a bonus pungent smell that is fresh from the chinese factory :lol: (lasts for weeks too)
brisrouleur
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:36 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby Nobody » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:19 pm

You guys might start a trend. I'll be interested to see what happens with this thread. I might go from cheaper bikes to cheap bikes for general low-Km commuting/utility purposes.

I spent more than double the asking price just on bits & pieces from CRC this week.
Nobody
 
Posts: 6625
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby ldrcycles » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:29 pm

WOW i can't believe the amount of interest in this! I can understand it but all the same, quite a shock :) .

So, I found my BB spanner this morning and continued my work. The BB could barely move it was so tight, and there was next to no grease in there. I greased and adjusted it the same way as i had the hubs, but i couldn't get the BB smooth. Even when it was loose enough that it wasn't properly secured, it was still notchy, so i just got it good enough and moved on. The cranks incidentally are steel, and weigh an absolute tonne, a huge amount of weight could be dropped there for very little outlay.

Next job was the headset. Can you guess how that had been adjusted? That's right, tight as a drum. Grease and adjust, and got it moving reasonably but not great. The stem popped in fine, handlebars needed to be tightened and then it was brakes.

Quite interesting to see the comment above about poor brakes, as my experience so far is not great. The callipers look alright, much better than the stamped steel junk you usually see on cheap bikes. However with the 700x35 tyres they could either be set up to allow wheel removal, or to provide some braking, but not both. On the subject of tyres, the rear had less than 1mm clearance from the brake bridge/calliper bolt, too close for my liking. I had a pair of 28c Michelin Citys spare so i threw them on, interesting to note it had reasonable sort of rim tape on there. While the feel of the brakes is ok (though i haven't really set them up yet) the left lever won't go all the way back. The levers have a small grub screw to adjust the reach but even with that removed entirely it won't return all the way home. I'll investigate a bit further before deciding if i need to try and get it replaced by big w.
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby ldrcycles » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:30 pm

Then it was just popping in the seatpost (very interesting, 28.6mm, i had expected it to be 25.4, though the seat tube is significantly larger than the down tube), that went in fine although the seat tube had a very pronounced seam running down it (obviously i was not expecting seamless tubing :lol: ), and the pedals.
The pedals are ordinary plastic BMX sort of things, but again, bearings done up ridiculously tight. By this stage i needed to get myself off to work so i didn't bother adjusting them and just threw them on.

I had just enough time to pop up and down the street, maybe 200 metres, and everything felt pretty reasonable. The handlebars came loose as i was going up my driveway, but after retightening and checking them they stayed put.

When i got to work i got it out of the car, popped it together and sat it near the back door where my coworkers would see it. So far the only negative comment was "looks a bit cheap" but even that was prefaced with "that looks pretty cool although". The majority opinion is that it looks nice, and especially so for $98.
Tomorrow morning if all goes according to plan i'll pop the SPD SLs on it and ride it on my 26k short commute.
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby ldrcycles » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:32 pm

PS, i found when i got the bike out of my car at work this morning that the tight bearings had resulted in the drive side pedal partially unscrewing even on my very short test ride.

Here are some pics.

Image

Image

Image
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby Nobody » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:16 pm

Nice looking bike for $98. I'm surprised.
Nobody
 
Posts: 6625
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby CommuRider » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:18 pm

janus77 wrote:$98, that's crazy.. nice effort buying one. I'd bet more than half the people reading this thread are tempted to go out and do just the same!


Perhaps but the link also showed BigW was selling 2 x $20 Itunes card for $30 :D
Amateur oenologist and green-friendly commuter.
User avatar
CommuRider
 
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby brisrouleur » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:27 pm

One other thing I've just noticed now after looking at said bike in the office again - the price one spends on components seems to match how much they spent on the bike!

Don't you love this ghetto styling...do you think this trend might take off lol!!
Image
brisrouleur
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:36 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby dfc. » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:59 pm

Would make a cool track bike. All it needs is some thinner wheels, fixed hub and curved bars. If I had the $98 (I wish I did) I would be down to BigW as soon as possible. :mrgreen:

It would benefit from a respray to

Whats that:

-$98 Bike
-$30 Paint
-$200 Wheels
-$50 Tyres
-$40 Handle Bars
-$___ for Fixed Hub

= $418 excluding fixed hub

Cheap way to go racing, but maybe to heavy
Visit my website https://sites.google.com/site/dfccyclesandautomotive/Owner of:

2006 Malvern Star Cobra (Mountain Bike)

2011 Trek 7.3FX (Flat Bar Road Bike) Just delivered!
dfc.
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:09 pm

Re: So how bad is a Big W bike, really?

Postby Comedian » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:59 pm

So if you were going to spend all that money on parts wouldn't you be better off just buying a decent bike? :o
Once you can climb hills on a bike it's all downhill. :mrgreen:

Hopefully I'll know what that's like..... one day. :shock: :lol:

Image
User avatar
Comedian
 
Posts: 4401
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Next

Return to Buying a bike / parts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: celeste boy



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU



InTouch with BNA
“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter