by WestcoastPete » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:12 am
Hmmmm....
I've just finished a renovation of my commuting bike - an '83 Nishiki Olympic 12. It now has a new wheelset (700c instead of 27"), bar end shifters, dynohub and lights, Longboard fenders etc. It's a joy to ride. My Rohloff/Belt hardcore tourer on the other hand just doesn't give me that same buzzy feeling riding it, and it's significantly less efficient (read: slower) with it's IHG than the derailleured Nishiki.
I love the expedition bike; don't get me wrong. But I bought it for the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route or the Moroccan Piste or the Mawson Trail, all of which it would chew up, but I'm not going to any of these places for this trip. This trip will be on mostly paved roads.
So I'm thinking of taking the Nishiki. Whoa. I never thought I'd think that. As an old 27" frame, it's got long chain stays and is very stable. It's got caliper brakes which don't pull up as well as the disks on the expedition bike, but they're still pretty strong. It doesn't have any racks at the moment and I've never ridden it with a load, but the geometry/frame stiffness should be fine for it. I lean forward on it a bit too, but I find it to be very comfortable - I lean forward on my Bike Friday too and it was fine for touring.
But what's the point in having a flash expedition bike if I prefer to take an old bike from the tip shop? Should I just get rid of it? And it's so low maintenance and easy to use; with the Nishiki I'd have to worry about lubing chains and managing derailleurs with triple chainrings etc instead of just flicking the wrist on the Rohloff. Yes, this is not really that hard to do, but part of the beauty of the expedition bike is not having to worry about this stuff...
Hmmmm....