I posted this question in the repco appreciation thread but I didn't get any response.
Basically I would like to know from any repco collectors that have all 3 models or have ridden all 3 models of bikes. What difference is there in the ride quality ? I understand that the better models were probably double butted chromoly and a bit lighter but how does that rate in the way it rides. Is it a slight difference or a large one ?
Is it the same difference stepping up from a heavy hi tensile 10 speed to a superlite ? If the bikes are faster than the superlite is there any negative effect such as becoming twitchy in steering or control.
I ask as I have seen a few olympics for sale which I understand are double butted chromoly as opposed to the superlites straight gauge chromoly on the main tubes so it's probably a bit lighter.
I like the way my superlite rides but like most riders, I would like to try a lighter steel frame if it's the right price. I'm not into racing but use my superlite mainly for going for a fast recreational ride or charity events.
I previously has a nice light (for steel) 1985 trek 500 but the frame was too small for me and very twitchy and I nearly crashed it a few times. Also many years ago I owned a giant kronos with triple butted chromoly tubes but I can't remember how that rides compared to my superlite.
I know I should probably go and ride a few of these bikes but I don't want to waste the sellers time or my own travelling to see one if there is little real difference between the bikes for general riding.
