Aluminium. You will (all other things being equal) get a better quality bike for your money without the associated hassles of carbon assembly and care.dan97 wrote:In conclusion
Aluminium or Carbon?
Lets say i have a budget of $1500
ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Nobody » Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:57 pm
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby dan97 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:18 pm
Would it be the same if i had a budget of $4000Nobody wrote:Aluminium. You will (all other things being equal) get a better quality bike for your money without the associated hassles of carbon assembly and care.dan97 wrote:In conclusion
Aluminium or Carbon?
Lets say i have a budget of $1500
- cyclotaur
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:36 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby cyclotaur » Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:23 pm
I doubt you'll find an Al bike in that price range ...dan97 wrote:Would it be the same if i had a budget of $4000Nobody wrote:Aluminium. You will (all other things being equal) get a better quality bike for your money without the associated hassles of carbon assembly and care.dan97 wrote:In conclusion
Aluminium or Carbon?
Lets say i have a budget of $1500
My old blog - A bit of fun
"Riding, not racing...completing, not competing"
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Mulger bill » Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:28 pm
As stated earlier, expensive Al is a better choice than cheap Cf. Remember, the cost portion for groupset and other bits will stay fairly constant across the range. Tiagra on a great frame is a better buy than Ultegra on an average frame.
London Boy 29/12/2011
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Nobody » Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:15 am
It begs the question, why do you want to spend $4000 on a bike?dan97 wrote:Would it be the same if i had a budget of $4000
There is a guy at my work who does long 140Km group rides and had a $1200 Al bike. He upgraded to a higher end carbon bike (secondhand) and told me it didn't make him any faster. So if the point of road bikes is to go faster, but an expensive carbon bike doesn't make most people go faster (to a noticeable degree) then what's the point?
If it's about comfort, then Mr Zinn's (very qualified) opinion I posted initially shows that you are probably better off buying magnesium, titanium or steel rather than carbon for comfort (although other things will make more difference like style of manufacture, tyre pressure, saddle selection, bar tape, etc).
However, if it's about image and impressing people, then you usually have a winner with carbon.
Buy what you want. Just don't fool yourself that it's much more than image you are buying at the high end. Remember that the law of diminishing returns are at work with the more you pay.
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby rkelsen » Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:36 am
At that price point I'd go for aluminium, or better yet... steel.
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby rkelsen » Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:42 am
Nope. At that price point, it's an entirely different ball game.dan97 wrote:Would it be the same if i had a budget of $4000
He can do what he likes, and should be able to without being sneered at.Nobody wrote:It begs the question, why do you want to spend $4000 on a bike?
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Nobody » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:08 am
I think you misread this. I didn't sneer at anyone, or put any significant emotion into it. If you were to meet me, you'd find as a technical person, I'm fairly emotionless. If I was 15 years old, I don't think I'd be significantly advantaged by a $4K bike that I'm likely to outgrow in a few years, just to lose a lot of money due to depreciation.rkelsen wrote:He can do what he likes, and should be able to without being sneered at.
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Mulger bill » Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:55 pm
I do get the feeling that young Dan is sucking very hard at the teat of knowledge represented by the members here.
Rhetorical and hypothetical questions are an excellent way of doing this quickly. My guess is most of us wish we had had such easy access to such a diverse range of knowledge and experience way back in the mists of time when we were his age.
More power to him I say.
Shaun
London Boy 29/12/2011
- waramatt
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:52 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby waramatt » Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:02 pm
I can't speak for its veracity, but I once read an article about a guy in England who kept stats for commute time on his carbon and steely bikes. Over a 40km or so daily round-trip commute the travel time only varied by 1-2m mins.
I reckon you can look at a bunch of bikes in a shop and for no particular reason, a bike will jump out at you. The next bloke might think it incredibly ugly, but you love it. If you then take that bike for a pedal and like it, then go with that.
My problem is I love so many of them. N+1
Good luck with your purchase, whatever you decide!
Giant TCR Adv 0 Di2
SE Draft Lite SS
Felt Dispatch SS
Surly Cross Check CX
Fuji Nevada 3.0 MTB
Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race. H G Wells
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Parrott » Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:38 pm
Disregard most of that drivel he posts
Most carbon bicycle frames are very nice to ride. The frame can be made to be stiff laterally but still have a relatively compliant ride vertically and all while lighter than the other major frame materials. The majority of people who own carbon bikes seem very happy with them IME. Go out and test ride a few and work it out for yourself.
If you do choose carbon it needs to be treated with care, which is not that hard to do if you value an item.
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Parrott » Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:47 pm
Just read that post. At that price point have a look here; http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewt ... 11&t=51377dan97 wrote:In conclusion
Aluminium or Carbon?
Lets say i have a budget of $1500
Otherwise go Aluminium or Nobody's fave an old steel beater
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Nobody » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:26 pm
This one?waramatt wrote:I can't speak for its veracity, but I once read an article about a guy in England who kept stats for commute time on his carbon and steely bikes. Over a 40km or so daily round-trip commute the travel time only varied by 1-2m mins.
http://road.cc/content/news/28400-docto ... over-steel
I like this quote from the link above.
Although buying the carbon bike made Mr Graves feel good and he still sometimes uses it for commuting, he enjoys riding the steel bike more. And if the carbon bike were stolen, would he replace it? “I’d have to say no. I’d spend the money on high visibility low drag clothing and better lights.”
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Nobody » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:32 pm
C'mon. How boring would it be if everyone agreed that carbon was the most wonderful thing since sliced bread? Somebody has to be the "villain" and introduce a logic argument into these forums' carbon love-fest.Parrott wrote:You will have worked out that Nobody is very passionate in his opposition to carbon.
Disregard most of that drivel he posts
-
- Posts: 10329
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Nobody » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:38 pm
Hey! My "steel beater" is not old! And I have two other bikes which are Al. And I've owned a carbon one in the past. Some people just love pigeon-hole me. I suppose it has to be expected being the anti-carbon "villain".Parrott wrote:Just read that post. At that price point have a look here; http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewt ... 11&t=51377dan97 wrote:In conclusion
Aluminium or Carbon?
Lets say i have a budget of $1500
Otherwise go Aluminium or Nobody's fave an old steel beater
- jacks1071
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Mackay, QLD
- Contact:
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby jacks1071 » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:59 pm
Here is a Pro-Lite Bella GP we built for a customer with Sram Red on it, the build came up over $4000. Of course the wheels were a significant part of that.. The bike pictured is about 6.6-6.7kg. I don't know how many carbon framed bikes you could get to that weight with that kind of budget?dan97 wrote:Would it be the same if i had a budget of $4000Nobody wrote:Aluminium. You will (all other things being equal) get a better quality bike for your money without the associated hassles of carbon assembly and care.dan97 wrote:In conclusion
Aluminium or Carbon?
Lets say i have a budget of $1500
With a good alloy wheel, Sram Red built up with the top end gear it wouldn't be hard to spend $3500 or there abouts and you'd end up with a bike about 6.9kg.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby dan97 » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:19 pm
This argument is similar to an argument i brought up in the R/C world. Brushless (acting as Carbon) is better than Brushed motors (Aluminium). This may not make sense to some of you guys but this statement is just not true! The brushless sells better because the pros use them. But Brushed motors have their good points to!
- jimsheedy
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:01 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby jimsheedy » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:31 pm
define a low end carbon framearand18 wrote:A high end aluminium frame will outperform a low end carbon fiber frame.
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Parrott » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:33 pm
Oh I don't know I reckon you'll come good in the end.Nobody wrote:How boring would it be if everyone agreed that carbon was the most wonderful thing since sliced bread? Somebody has to be the "villain"
And anyway your helmet is carbon
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Parrott » Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:00 am
http://www.pinkbike.com/news/Video-of-t ... -2012.html
-
- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby rkelsen » Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:11 am
I love seeing advances of all kinds. I love retro hardware of all kinds. I love trying different things to see how they work. Sometimes I think they're better, sometimes I think they're worse. Sometimes I agree with popular opinion, sometimes I don't.
You like what you like. I like what I like. Why argue about it?
- Parrott
- Posts: 2960
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby Parrott » Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:51 am
Not much in life is completely black and white or cut and dried and frame materials are no exception. Each material has its own pluses and minuses, and the correct choice of material depends alot on its intended use.
If I am using it though it is cut and dried, carbon all the way
- jacks1071
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Mackay, QLD
- Contact:
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby jacks1071 » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:07 pm
I'd define a carbon frame that is heavier than an alloy frame of similar or lower price to be "low end"jimsheedy wrote:define a low end carbon framearand18 wrote:A high end aluminium frame will outperform a low end carbon fiber frame.
Of course there is much more to it than that but weight is something you can put a number on.
I'd define high-end carbon as any known "good" brand carbon frame that is sub 1kg weight.
- yarravalleyplodder
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: Gateway to the Yarra Valley
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby yarravalleyplodder » Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:58 pm
I reckon the answer to this debate is a mixture of carbon & aluminium
Get a Felt F75 with a 7005 Superlite butted aluminum frame attached to an Advanced monocoque carbon fibre fork
A Felt F75 will cost you less that $1500 (just) http://www.bikeexchange.com.au/bicycles ... /102093946
They are a lovely bike, quick off the mark, not bad on the hills and 105 is not the best but far from the worst groupset out there.
I know I am biased as I own one but I am yet to hear from a Felt F75 owner who doesnt love their bike
Seriously though, my budget was $1500 and all the research I did led me to the conclusion that in that price bracket you were going to get better bang for your buck with an aluminium bike
2012 Fuji Nevada 2.0
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:48 am
Re: ALUMINIUM VS CARBON FIBRE
Postby bossonbike » Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:00 pm
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.