Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Tue May 01, 2012 8:57 am

I found it interesting that while some of the Shimano road cranksets have Al spindles, the M770 XT MTB cranks are steel. So I just replaced my 105 5650 compact road crankset with 5750 to find they are now using steel spindles in these too. Maybe they had a few more failures in Al than they thought they would and so went to steel. Good for me as I'm happier to keep these a bit longer and just replace the chainrings next time.

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:04 pm

As suspected, the reason is long-term durability.
Shimano USA’s vice president, Wayne Stetina, has a different take on things: “The BB30 is an optimized design for an aluminum spindle, and 24mm diameter is the optimized size for a steel spindle. But, after five to 10 years, an aluminum spindle will eventually fail. Neither of the designs are the ultimate.”
http://www.roadbikeaction.com/Most-Popu ... kdown.html

rkelsen
Posts: 5131
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby rkelsen » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:29 pm

Nobody wrote:
"Neither of the designs are the ultimate."
Which is why they should go back to the square taper. It is a design which proved itself for decades.

User avatar
Bentnose
Posts: 1327
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:00 am
Location: N/E suburbs Melbourne, Victoria

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Bentnose » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:05 am

So many bottom bracket systems, till they settle down I'll stick with threaded external cups. I think FSA's suggestion that the 24mm spindle will go away from high end bikes will not come true, but time will tell.
No signature

User avatar
ldrcycles
Posts: 9594
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby ldrcycles » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:15 am

rkelsen wrote:
Nobody wrote:
"Neither of the designs are the ultimate."
Which is why they should go back to the square taper. It is a design which proved itself for decades.
+1, i love square taper. Especially with a seperate axle BB, very easy to service.
"I must be rather keen on cycling"- Sir Hubert Opperman.

Road Record Association of Australia

__PG__
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:30 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby __PG__ » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:50 am

Unfortunately it's not about the 'best'. New 'standards' are often created to increase profitability (e.g. Tapered steerers and 1.5 inch headset bearings) rather than building a better bike. If enough manufacturers move together they can act like a cartel anyway.

Having said that I doubt Shimano's claim that 'all aluminum 30 mm spindles will fail in five years'.
Image
1994 Cecil Walker (now retired)
2013 Baum Corretto
2014 Cell Awaba 1.0

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:59 am

__PG__ wrote:Having said that I doubt Shimano's claim that 'all aluminum 30 mm spindles will fail in five years'.
He said, "But, after five to 10 years, an aluminum spindle will eventually fail."

jasonc
Posts: 12170
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:40 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby jasonc » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:01 am

Nobody wrote:
__PG__ wrote:Having said that I doubt Shimano's claim that 'all aluminum 30 mm spindles will fail in five years'.
He said, "But, after five to 10 years, an aluminum spindle will eventually fail."
and how many of us would use a spindle for that long anyway?

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:07 am

jasonc wrote:and how many of us would use a spindle for that long anyway?
I have. However, on average, the kind of person to buy a 30mm spindle is unlikely to keep their bike that long. The secondhand buyer just needs to be aware that Al crank spindles have a fatigue life.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby il padrone » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:35 am

jasonc wrote:and how many of us would use a spindle for that long anyway?
Never mind the spindle - the entire square-taper cartridge bearing set has been in my son's bike since 1995. Originally my bike, it's done plenty of kilometres too.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
ozdavo
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Gold Coast (nth)

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby ozdavo » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:43 am

Nobody wrote:I found it interesting that while some of the Shimano road cranksets have Al spindles,
Have shimano (or anyone?) ever produced a production alloy 24mm BB spindle? I thought 24mm has always been steel?
Always looking for new rides & ride partners in SE QLD area

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:55 am

ozdavo wrote:
Nobody wrote:I found it interesting that while some of the Shimano road cranksets have Al spindles,
Have shimano (or anyone?) ever produced a production alloy 24mm BB spindle? I thought 24mm has always been steel?
As per original post, my 5650 105 (2010?) cranks were alloy spindle. Also the Tiagra 4500 pictured below.
Image

__PG__
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:30 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby __PG__ » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:17 pm

Has there been a reported flood of BB30 cranksets that have failed in the past few years?

I can't see how SRAM, FSA, Cannondale etc would send critical components off to market with a five year fatigue design life. In any case, it's the mileage that matters. Maybe a BB30 spindle will fail after 100,000 km or so.

But if BB30 spindles were as fragile as the Shimano rep suggested you'd have epidemics of amateur racers with broken cranksets.

I think the Shimano rep is just using a scare tactic to talk down the opposition.
Image
1994 Cecil Walker (now retired)
2013 Baum Corretto
2014 Cell Awaba 1.0

warthog1
Posts: 14305
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
Location: Bendigo

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby warthog1 » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:58 pm

There looks to be a fair thickness of metal on that tiagra crankset.

Seems unlikely to fail to me :? especially with the limited power I am able to generate :oops:
Dogs are the best people :wink:

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:58 pm

__PG__ wrote:I can't see how SRAM, FSA, Cannondale etc would send critical components off to market with a five year fatigue design life. In any case, it's the mileage that matters. Maybe a BB30 spindle will fail after 100,000 km or so.
Probably right about being about Kms and not time.
__PG__ wrote:But if BB30 spindles were as fragile as the Shimano rep suggested you'd have epidemics of amateur racers with broken cranksets.
Even steel can break if the bearing seizes.
http://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewt ... 34&t=40469

Have BB30 been popular for 10 years yet?
__PG__ wrote:I think the Shimano rep is just using a scare tactic to talk down the opposition.
The fact they changed from Al to steel for spindles says a lot in itself.

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:02 pm

warthog1 wrote:There looks to be a fair thickness of metal on that tiagra crankset.
Image

__PG__
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:30 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby __PG__ » Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:22 pm

Nobody wrote:The fact they changed from Al to steel for spindles says a lot in itself.
But that was for 24 mm diameter spindles, not 30 mm.
Image
1994 Cecil Walker (now retired)
2013 Baum Corretto
2014 Cell Awaba 1.0

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:41 pm

__PG__ wrote:But that was for 24 mm diameter spindles, not 30 mm.
True. Like most things, the truth will come out eventually.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby trailgumby » Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:58 pm

Bikes are like R/C cars. They change things and make them incompatible with old things to keep the market turning over.

If we're lucky, the change might even bring an improvement occasionally. :mrgreen:

warthog1
Posts: 14305
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
Location: Bendigo

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby warthog1 » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:09 pm

trailgumby wrote:Bikes are like R/C cars. They change things and make them incompatible with old things to keep the market turning over.

If we're lucky, the change might even bring an improvement occasionally. :mrgreen:
I'll go with that too, b@stards :(

The amount of different bb designs is starting to get/has gotten a bit over the top now :?
Dogs are the best people :wink:

warthog1
Posts: 14305
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
Location: Bendigo

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby warthog1 » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:12 pm

Nobody wrote:
warthog1 wrote:There looks to be a fair thickness of metal on that tiagra crankset.
Image
That would have to be pretty hard to break with the power the average punter puts out wouldn't it?

Wear on the surface where the bearings contact would be more likely to see it out IMHO.
Dogs are the best people :wink:

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:36 pm

warthog1 wrote:That would have to be pretty hard to break with the power the average punter puts out wouldn't it?
Since some on these forums have broken crank arms, nothing surprises me. Shimano must have had a reason to change. If I remember correctly doubles came with steel and compacts came with the alloy spindle. Maybe they thought compact users were soft and won't use their cranksets as much. Maybe they were proven wrong...

Nobody
Posts: 10316
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby Nobody » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:41 pm

trailgumby wrote:Bikes are like R/C cars. They change things and make them incompatible with old things to keep the market turning over.

If we're lucky, the change might even bring an improvement occasionally. :mrgreen:
Agree. Some of the changes I've appreciated over the last 20 years or so (in no particular order):
1 1/8" Aheadset (threadless).
Stems face-plates that unbolt so you can remove the handlebar easily.
Double walled rims.
Disc brakes.
Two bolt seatpost saddle rail clamps.
Seatpost clamps that are not part of the frame.
Dual clamp seatpost clamps (different size for frame and post).
STI/Ergo (although I still don't have them).
Wider range road cassettes and more gears (although I think 9 is plenty).

User avatar
twizzle
Posts: 6402
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:45 am
Location: Highlands of Wales.

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby twizzle » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:09 am

Product differentiation = consumer tie-in. People think that newer = better, get suckered in an then have to get all their parts from the original manufacturer.

Things that come instantly to mind...

Alloy freehubs. Just sooooo durable, but I guess "The Market" replaces the wheels before they need to get that cassette off.
"Unique" spokes. Because it's always fun to wait weeks to get a replacement for that spoke you broke, isn't it?
Every bottom bracket system since square drive. Although, I really do like the Shimano two-piece setup, it is engineering elegance.
Shimano's chain rings for the last few years. Cheaper to buy a new crankset than buy replacement chain rings - if you could even find them.
11 speed - because it has to be better than ten speed. Right? Or because it wears out quicker and you spend more on servicing.
Gary Fisher's wider front hubs. "Stiffer"? Riiight.
Carbon rims with alloy braking surfaces - awesome, a heavy rim that wears out just like ones you can buy for 25% of the price, and all you get is a .2kph speed advantage once over 40kph!
Everything claiming that a 15 gram saving in weight was worth the doubling in price.
Garmin - making you pay twice the price to get a feature that was implemented in the software and could have been made available to all of the older models.
I ride, therefore I am. But don't ride into harm's way.
...real cyclists don't have squeaky chains...

User avatar
ldrcycles
Posts: 9594
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Shimano rethinks road crank spindles on 105

Postby ldrcycles » Mon Aug 20, 2012 2:59 pm

Nobody wrote: Some of the changes I've appreciated over the last 20 years or so (in no particular order):
1 1/8" Aheadset (threadless).
Stems face-plates that unbolt so you can remove the handlebar easily.
YES!
Nobody wrote: Disc brakes.
MEH. other than for crazy muddy races (conditions where the race should probably be called off anyway) i reckon Vs or cantis are just fine. As for discs on road bikes :roll: .
"I must be rather keen on cycling"- Sir Hubert Opperman.

Road Record Association of Australia

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users