Yeah but it's all that was available at the time.ldrcycles wrote:I understand there is a character limit on twitter but that (and the headlines all the news sites are going with) is very misleading IMO, he hasn't accepted a life ban, he has just said he won't fight the charges that may lead to a life ban. And it's not a matter of he WILL lose the titles, he MAY lose them.The 2nd Womble wrote: Cycling Central-
"Lance Armstrong has accepted his life ban and will lose all his Tour de France titles. More to come soon."
EDIT: wanted to clarify the above statement was Cycling Central's, not the womble's.
HOLY !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !!!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby The 2nd Womble » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:05 pm
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby Xplora » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:08 pm
The impression I get is that he is NOT welcome.Jono L. wrote:He is more than welcome to take the case to the CAS is if he is unhappy about jurisdiction....Xplora wrote:It probably IS an attempt to keep evidence out of the public domain, but he has a legitimate complaint - if Lance doesn't work or race under USADA jurisdiction, then they don't get to charge him. If he can't reasonably expect a fair hearing where justice is served, then he should not be forced to defend the charges. We call them Kangaroo Courts in Australia.
This is the problem - it seems clear that there is no real interest in "natural justice" for this case. It doesn't matter if he's a juicing dopehead crackbaby smuggler, the enforcement bodies must play by the rules to catch people, otherwise there is no justice. It is incredibly important to remember that statutes of limitations exist for a reason, jurisdiction exists for a reason, procedural fairness exists for a reason. What is to stop the UCI banning a local race you organise with your friends? Natural justice. Nothing more.
-
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:31 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby rogan » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:09 pm
So let's see how we go here:
1999 Hapless Alex Zulle got second, but he admitted to EPO (dunno why, it never helped him). I think that makes Escartin the winner.
2000 Ullrich got second. Bzzt! Beloki. Hmmm. A bit suss, but nothing proven.
2001 Same top three. Looks like Beloki went back to back. Who knew?
2002 Beloki got second that year. Three in a row.
2003 Second was Ullrich. Third was Vinokourov. Hmm. Fourth was Tyler Hamilton. This could take a while. Haimar Zubeldia was fifth. We have a winner.
2004 Second was Kloden. Have to give it to him I think.
2005 Second was Basso, third was Ullrich. Fourth was Mancebo, who retired immediately upon Operation Puerto being publicised. He's out. Vinokourov was fifth. Leipheimer was sixth. Rasmussen (the latter day Pollentier) was 7th. Ahem. Moving right along. Our Cadel was eighth... So...
Well, that was fun...
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby toolonglegs » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:19 pm
-
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby Wal42 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:33 pm
Will all the serious pro types stay off my rear wheel just because I may be 'tainted' ???????
Cool, think I may start riding the damn thing again, if Armstrong did in fact cheat, then so be it, he was probably just doing what everybody else was doing.
Who knows what they'll discover in 3, 5, 10 years time about most cyclists, Chinese athletes, etc, when testing gets better.
Yep, he may have doped or done the blood transfusion thing, they probably all did, but I think the whole USADA thing has been a 'tall poppy' syndrome, they were always going to chuck as much mud as it took to tarnish Armstrong (and every American cyclist of the last 15 years), maybe they should check all cyclists who are still alive for any traces of drugs, what do you think the chances that every cyclist over the last 40 years took something (non-perscription use of broncio dialators was rife during the late 60's to 80's).
To justify their existence, the USADA has targeted the biggest fishes, they couldn't afford to test all the riders in the recent Tour of California, but they have managed to spend bucket loads on trying to find every US rider of the last 15 years guilty of doping, maybe these guys are guilty, maybe they're not, to this point there has been no absolute concrete evidence presented (that I've seen), it's all been rumour & innuendo. So how many riders were guilty of riding whilst doped during the Tour of California? Would we ever know because the USADA has blown their budget pursuing past sins.
Yep, all of those guys may have doped, concentrate on today, get drugs out of the current competition, use the budget on catching those who are using current state of the art methods to gain an unfair advantage now, what does going back 15 years & trying to sully somebodies reputation, because they won (either fairly or by being the best at bending the rules), it doesn't fix anything now, all it does is further sully the reputation of cycling.
Just my opinion, but I'd like to see the sport move on, get clean & stronger rather than vanish because of past mis-deeds.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10579
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby find_bruce » Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:47 pm
You might want to re-think 2004 - Koden was alleged to have used the Freiburg University Clinic for an illegal blood transfusion during the 2006 Tour de France. You can rule out fifth Jose Azevedo becuase he was part of US Postal alleged to have been part of the grand consipiracy & he benefitted from Armstrong in the TT, sixth Mancebo. Think that leaves seventh Georg Totschnig.rogan wrote:So who gets the 7 Tours? I'm glad you asked. Obviously if they take them off Lance, you can't just give them to some other tainted rider. Just a thought experiment really, don't get too upset if I've trashed your favourite rider on insubstantial or flawed evidence!
So let's see how we go here:
1999 Hapless Alex Zulle got second, but he admitted to EPO (dunno why, it never helped him). I think that makes Escartin the winner.
2000 Ullrich got second. Bzzt! Beloki. Hmmm. A bit suss, but nothing proven.
2001 Same top three. Looks like Beloki went back to back. Who knew?
2002 Beloki got second that year. Three in a row.
2003 Second was Ullrich. Third was Vinokourov. Hmm. Fourth was Tyler Hamilton. This could take a while. Haimar Zubeldia was fifth. We have a winner.
2004 Second was Kloden. Have to give it to him I think.
2005 Second was Basso, third was Ullrich. Fourth was Mancebo, who retired immediately upon Operation Puerto being publicised. He's out. Vinokourov was fifth. Leipheimer was sixth. Rasmussen (the latter day Pollentier) was 7th. Ahem. Moving right along. Our Cadel was eighth... So...
Well, that was fun...
The mountains classification for 2004 is similar - rule out (1) Virenque (2) Armstrong (3) Rasmussen (4) Basso (5) Ullrich (6) Moreau (7) Klöden (8) Mancebo (9) Jens Voigt - woo hoo I bet he can't wait to get his polka dot jersey after 8 years.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby biker jk » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:01 pm
http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/12712 ... ipped.aspx
- Tornado
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:25 am
- Location: Mandurah WA
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby Tornado » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:03 pm
The USADA strip titles? I don't know who runs who, or who has more power than who. But it feels to me like Team America World Police thinking they can do what ever they want over the top of everyone.
If the UCI is the highest body and the body under which he competed I would assume they are the ones who will ultimately decide his fate.
2015 Specialized Tarmac
2012 Avanti Giro3
- schroeds
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby schroeds » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:15 pm
Even though the cycling community of course has been following the LA 'case' for some time, the broader public are about to become aware of it big time.
So that's 9 Tour results rendered invalid, right? It's a simply overwhelming number. What does that do to the public view of the world's premier cycling event, and in turn what does that do to the sponsors' view of the value of being associated with it, and how does that affect government support for the sport.
This is bad indeed for anybody that cares about cycling.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby il padrone » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:16 pm
+1Tornado wrote:Guilty or not I think the damage is done. Mud sticks. We will probably never know if he ate Azaria Chamberlin or doped.
The USADA strip titles? I don't know who runs who, or who has more power than who. But it feels to me like Team America World Police thinking they can do what ever they want over the top of everyone.
If the UCI is the highest body and the body under which he competed I would assume they are the ones who will ultimately decide his fate.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- cyclotaur
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:36 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby cyclotaur » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:33 pm
If it was a criminal issue he wouldn't have that option. The best he could do in a criminal case, to prevent all the evidence being heard, is to plead guilty.
My old blog - A bit of fun
"Riding, not racing...completing, not competing"
- biker jk
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby biker jk » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:34 pm
Perhaps the good that can come from this is reform of the UCI which presided over that terrible period of blood doping in cycling. The UCI should not be responsible for drug tests. There is a clear conflict of interest as it also promotes and administers the sport of cycling. Drug testing needs to be conducted by an independent body.schroeds wrote:Nobody's commented on what a tragedy this is for our sport. Perhaps that's obvious but it needs saying...again.
Even though the cycling community of course has been following the LA 'case' for some time, the broader public are about to become aware of it big time.
So that's 9 Tour results rendered invalid, right? It's a simply overwhelming number. What does that do to the public view of the world's premier cycling event, and in turn what does that do to the sponsors' view of the value of being associated with it, and how does that affect government support for the sport.
This is bad indeed for anybody that cares about cycling.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby il padrone » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:48 pm
Just to put that into the understanding of the average Joe... like the AFL does not take responsibility for their own drug testing...... ummmbiker jk wrote:The UCI should not be responsible for drug tests. There is a clear conflict of interest as it also promotes and administers the sport of cycling. Drug testing needs to be conducted by an independent body.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby The 2nd Womble » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:19 pm
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
- cyclotaur
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:36 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby cyclotaur » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:31 pm
I couldn't disagree more with this, actually.schroeds wrote:Nobody's commented on what a tragedy this is for our sport. Perhaps that's obvious but it needs saying...again.
.... This is bad indeed for anybody that cares about cycling.
LA is the last, and most symbolic, hold-out on the whole issue. Whether he accepts it or not, his discontinuation of the fight against the charges amounts to an admission of guilt. Officially he will now be there with the rest of them, the difference being the others by and large had good reasons to either shut up and accept their sanctions or come out and admit to doping.
LA has, in his own mind at least, good reasons to continue to insist on his own innocence. He is either in denial or feels he has too much to lose, personally and publicly, to face the testimony of others, accept the outcome or admit his guilt. "Never tested positive" has become a meaningless and empty mantra.
Placing Armstrong on the same list as everyone else who's been caught throughout the same period consigns the whole sorry saga of PEDs in cycling further into history, in my opinion. And it makes the rigorously tested riders of today even more admirable, and the sport of cycling can now hold its head up higher in that it does as much as any sport to prevent or detect the decreasing numbers of riders still prepared to chance their arm. I can also understand people who got involved in cycling because of Lance Armstrong being upset, confused, angry or disillusioned - they will now have to find other motivations to stay involved.
But I feel better this afternoon about pro-cycling than I did this morning. The only better thing would be if LA could just come out and say, "OK I did it just like everyone else was doing at the time... and we were all wrong and the sport has thankfully now moved on". But that probably won't ever happen.
I think the simple pleasure of riding, and even competing if you choose, is no different now than yesterday if your motivation comes fundamentally from within, and from the sport itself, and not because of the hero status of anyone else.
The End.
My old blog - A bit of fun
"Riding, not racing...completing, not competing"
- The 2nd Womble
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby The 2nd Womble » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:40 pm
Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
-
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:55 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby Baldy » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:49 pm
Frank Schleck.cyclotaur wrote:I couldn't disagree more with this, actually.schroeds wrote:Nobody's commented on what a tragedy this is for our sport. Perhaps that's obvious but it needs saying...again.
.... This is bad indeed for anybody that cares about cycling.
LA is the last, and most symbolic, hold-out on the whole issue. Whether he accepts it or not, his discontinuation of the fight against the charges amounts to an admission of guilt. Officially he will now be there with the rest of them, the difference being the others by and large had good reasons to either shut up and accept their sanctions or come out and admit to doping.
LA has, in his own mind at least, good reasons to continue to insist on his own innocence. He is either in denial or feels he has too much to lose, personally and publicly, to face the testimony of others, accept the outcome or admit his guilt. "Never tested positive" has become a meaningless and empty mantra.
Placing Armstrong on the same list as everyone else who's been caught throughout the same period consigns the whole sorry saga of PEDs in cycling further into history, in my opinion. And it makes the rigorously tested riders of today even more admirable, and the sport of cycling can now hold its head up higher in that it does as much as any sport to prevent or detect the decreasing numbers of riders still prepared to chance their arm. I can also understand people who got involved in cycling because of Lance Armstrong being upset, confused, angry or disillusioned - they will now have to find other motivations to stay involved.
But I feel better this afternoon about pro-cycling than I did this morning. The only better thing would be if LA could just come out and say, "OK I did it just like everyone else was doing at the time... and we were all wrong and the sport has thankfully now moved on". But that probably won't ever happen.
I think the simple pleasure of riding, and even competing if you choose, is no different now than yesterday if your motivation comes fundamentally from within, and from the sport itself, and not because of the hero status of anyone else.
The End.
- schroeds
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby schroeds » Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:00 pm
cyclotaur wrote: I feel better this afternoon about pro-cycling than I did this morning.
I think the simple pleasure of riding, and even competing if you choose, is no different now than yesterday if your motivation comes fundamentally from within, and from the sport itself, and not because of the hero status of anyone else.
You might feel better but my point is that the people who fund cycling will not.
Yes my pleasure in riding is undented, but I like to watch well prepared (in the pre PED sense of the word), well organised athletes meeting their performance potential. Without ongoing funding that'll be harder.
- cyclotaur
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 1:36 pm
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby cyclotaur » Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:21 pm
Do you mean the post-PED period? Because there really was no pre-PED period - it was a problem that grew gradually from the classic 'bombs' given to the earliest competitors in the sport (and I mean the earliest...) to a fully-blown, pharmaceutical-backed system of team and individual performance enhancement.schroeds wrote:You might feel better but my point is that the people who fund cycling will not.cyclotaur wrote: I feel better this afternoon about pro-cycling than I did this morning.
I think the simple pleasure of riding, and even competing if you choose, is no different now than yesterday if your motivation comes fundamentally from within, and from the sport itself, and not because of the hero status of anyone else.
Yes my pleasure in riding is undented, but I like to watch well prepared (in the pre PED sense of the word), well organised athletes meeting their performance potential. Without ongoing funding that'll be harder.
So what you are watching now is actually what you think you were watching at an earlier time. NOW is the best and the cleanest we've ever had, and that's why I feel better tonight than I did this morning.
And I take the point about Frank Schleck but, with respect, he's not in the same league as LA - for many reasons.
My old blog - A bit of fun
"Riding, not racing...completing, not competing"
- clackers
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:48 am
- Location: Melbourne
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby clackers » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:00 pm
Another one who denied any wrong doing.Baldy wrote:
Frank Schleck.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7001
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby biker jk » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:07 pm
“In 2004 I was meant to travel in a car that had an American writer, a British writer and an Australian writer and I had travelled with them many times. I first travelled with the English journalist back in 1984, if memory serves me. They didn’t want me in the car because Armstrong’s team had made it known to them that they wouldn’t get a lot of cooperation if I was in the car. And rather than stand by journalism they chose to do what was expedient but that’s what people did. Pretty much every English speaking journalist on the Tour in those early Armstrong years was in one way or another trying to defend Armstrong.”
“When you think of all the nonsense we had to listen to about Armstrong being faster than Pantani in '98. Armstrong goes and rides a faster Tour a year later and you have all these idiot journalists saying, well the roads and the bikes are better, it’s logical. It was all completely illogical and if they were being honest they would have known this.”
“You still see it today. There are still some journalists going out from England to cover the Tour who half believe that Armstrong is innocent, who have been defending him. Complete buffoons.”
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/david-w ... as-charges
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby Xplora » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:19 pm
I think part of his argument is that the evidence couldn't be tested fairly by USADA, and the tests that HAVE been done are ignored by them. It seems clear that drugs are a part of professional cycling, and sport in general. I can't afford the diet to be a truly amazing athlete, let alone the supplements and training. Cycling has at least recognised that these feats are almost impossible to achieve. No one is mentioning the teams, just the lead riders... the whole thing is an embarrassment, and I think the sports federations need to either say "test OK, that's it" or continually face this kind of circus.cyclotaur wrote:LA does NOT want the evidence and testimony of others tested publicly, much less in a court.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby il padrone » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:29 pm
So in a couple of sentences you just trash the whole history of the TdF and pro-cycling generally . Merckx, Anquetil, LeMond, Fignon, Hinault, Indurain, Ulrich.... all on the juice ??cyclotaur wrote: Because there really was no pre-PED period - it was a problem that grew gradually from the classic 'bombs' given to the earliest competitors in the sport (and I mean the earliest...) to a fully-blown, pharmaceutical-backed system of team and individual performance enhancement.
So what you are watching now is actually what you think you were watching at an earlier time. NOW is the best and the cleanest we've ever had, and that's why I feel better tonight than I did this morning.
OK, well that just destroys any faith (and interest) in the concept of cycle-sport competition. And there is no reason to believe that anything is different, despite the urgent proclamations of how "clean" the sport is now. Why should any fans care now?
[edit] Anyway, maybe time we merged this thread with the one that already exists??
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby RonK » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:44 pm
First by doping to win the TDF 7 times.
Now by refusing to face the evidence against him that he did indeed win by doping.
I was once one of your biggest fans Mr Armstrong. Now I think you are a lying, cheating mongrel.
- greyhoundtom
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
- Location: Wherever the sun is shining
- Contact:
Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!
Postby greyhoundtom » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:09 pm
I also have no doubt that LA used PED’s during his cycling career, and while others may dismiss the level playing field scenario, to me it makes perfect sense.
LA won 7 TdF, against all competition, and that still makes him the greatest as far as I’m concerned.
The next crop of athletes will be looking at genetic manipulation instead of PED’s and that will not only be just about impossible to detect, but will also be carried forward into their offspring.
If anyone thinks that professional cycling or any other professional athletic competition is going to be all nice and clean and above board from here on in, they need to get their heads out of the sand.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.