Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Equipment and On Road Behaviour, Laws and Rules. Cycling Promotion and Advocacy

Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby The 2nd Womble » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:28 pm

And yet 300 whatever drivers run red through just one Melbourne intersectionj in one day and it gets a passing one line reference? Pi55 poor effort at 89kph through that camera as well btw :lol:
http://www.thechronicle.com.au/story/20 ... own-range/
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
User avatar
The 2nd Womble
 
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

by BNA » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:52 pm

BNA
 

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby KenGS » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:52 pm

Strava segment?
--Ken
Helmets! Bells! Rego!
User avatar
KenGS
 
Posts: 1455
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Rosanna, Victoria

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby ldrcycles » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:56 pm

Would have looked something like this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwFxD7zbU3s

One of the comments on the article states that demerit points cannot be applied to a drivers licence for offences committed on a bicycle. Is that right? I was pretty sure it had been confirmed on here (with links to relevant sections) that demerit points could apply.
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby The 2nd Womble » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:58 pm

They do apply in Qld.
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
User avatar
The 2nd Womble
 
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby warthog1 » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:30 pm

FFS :roll:
User avatar
warthog1
 
Posts: 2885
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby skull » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:38 pm

Would be scary fun. A bit stupid on a road restricted to lower.

Have touched 100 going down the huon hwy but that us a 100 zone

Sent from my not iDevice using Tapatalk 2
User avatar
skull
 
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 pm

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby find_bruce » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:58 pm

I have the strangest sense of deja moo. The question of demerit points whilst cycling has been addressed on numerous occassions. While I used to think they applied to cycling, I was wrong! Whilst the road rules apply to all road users, including cyclists & pedestrians, demerit points arise from having a driver's licence and relate solely to offences related to the driving or use of motor vehicles.

The question here is Queensland. Schedule 9 of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Driver Licensing) Regulation 2010 (Qld) includes the following definition
demerit points offence means an offence, other than an offence committed by a person while riding a bicycle, against a provision mentioned in schedule 3.
Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 3770
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby Oxford » Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:18 pm

The 2nd Womble wrote:They do apply in Qld.

not in Qld they don't, only apply to motor vehicle offences.
Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Driver Licensing) Regulation 1999 wrote:demerit points offence means an offence, other than an offence committed by a person while riding a bicycle, against a provision mentioned in schedule 3.

<edit> didn't see find_bruce's post until I refreshed the screen.

I really wish the police would familiarse themselves with the laws they are supposed to enforce before going off half cocked. whilst the act is seemingly stupid and they deserve to be fined, demerit points do not apply and the police should know this. how many fines are actually issued by police that are not valid in some way I wonder? I'd say plenty going by this article.
Building more roads to prevent congestion is like a fat man loosening his belt to prevent obesity.
- Lewis Mumford
User avatar
Oxford
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby twizzle » Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:41 pm

Oxford wrote:I really wish the police would familiarse themselves with the laws they are supposed to enforce before going off half cocked. whilst the act is seemingly stupid and they deserve to be fined, demerit points do not apply and the police should know this. how many fines are actually issued by police that are not valid in some way I wonder? I'd say plenty going by this article.


Gee, just the other week the police in (I think) SA had to have a major grovel (in the press no less) for booking a woman for using a mobile phone.... while pushing a pram. They have now realised that it is not a vehicle and she was not a driver. :?
I ride, therefore I am.
...real cyclists don't have squeaky chains...
User avatar
twizzle
 
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:45 am
Location: Taking a break.

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby Kenzo » Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:51 pm

skull wrote:Have touched 100 going down the huon hwy but that us a 100 zone

Nice one! I'm yet to beat 86...
User avatar
Kenzo
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 8:13 am
Location: Daisy Hill / Brisbane, Southside FTW

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby KenGS » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:02 pm

Kenzo wrote:
skull wrote:Have touched 100 going down the huon hwy but that us a 100 zone

Nice one! I'm yet to beat 86...

Missed it by that much. :wink:
--Ken
Helmets! Bells! Rego!
User avatar
KenGS
 
Posts: 1455
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Rosanna, Victoria

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby Tornado » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:07 pm

Gee, just the other week the police in (I think) SA had to have a major grovel (in the press no less) for booking a woman for using a mobile phone.... while pushing a pram. They have now realised that it is not a vehicle and she was not a driver. :?

Twas WA but yes you are right.

The entry standards to the Force appear to have dropped
Image

2012 Avanti Giro 3
2003 GT Palomar
User avatar
Tornado
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:25 am
Location: Mandurah WA

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby ldrcycles » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:08 pm

twizzle wrote:Gee, just the other week the police in (I think) SA had to have a major grovel (in the press no less) for booking a woman for using a mobile phone.... while pushing a pram. They have now realised that it is not a vehicle and she was not a driver. :?


You've got to be kidding :shock: .

Kenzo wrote:
skull wrote:Have touched 100 going down the huon hwy but that us a 100 zone

Nice one! I'm yet to beat 86...


95, but i had an argument with the road and came off 2nd best, take it a lot slower now :) .
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby rpmspinman » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:13 pm

twizzle wrote:
Oxford wrote:I really wish the police would familiarse themselves with the laws they are supposed to enforce before going off half cocked. whilst the act is seemingly stupid and they deserve to be fined, demerit points do not apply and the police should know this. how many fines are actually issued by police that are not valid in some way I wonder? I'd say plenty going by this article.


Gee, just the other week the police in (I think) SA had to have a major grovel (in the press no less) for booking a woman for using a mobile phone.... while pushing a pram. They have now realised that it is not a vehicle and she was not a driver. :?


That's SA police clutching at straws right there.

As for the cyclist doing that speed. He has some large balls to do that speed and not get clipped by another car.
Cheers
Shav

My Bikes:
2011 Kona Dew Plus (commuter)
2012 Focus Cayo 2.0 (road)
User avatar
rpmspinman
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:50 am
Location: on a chair in lycra

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby twizzle » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:36 pm

Linky to story re. mobile & pram.
I ride, therefore I am.
...real cyclists don't have squeaky chains...
User avatar
twizzle
 
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:45 am
Location: Taking a break.

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby Oxford » Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:50 pm

twizzle wrote:Linky to story re. mobile & pram.

that really made me laugh and scream at the same time. how absurd and how often do we get told, too late, ticket is written it cannot be withdrawn? any wonder why people are cynical?
Building more roads to prevent congestion is like a fat man loosening his belt to prevent obesity.
- Lewis Mumford
User avatar
Oxford
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby jules21 » Wed Sep 12, 2012 5:24 pm

Supt Vanderbyl said the actions of the two cyclists were an accident waiting to happen.

"All it takes is for a car or truck to pull out in front of them and then we are dealing with a fatality," Supt Vanderbyl said.

yeah, but no one did hit them? doesn't that mean no offense was committed? :roll:
Image
User avatar
jules21
 
Posts: 8729
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby bychosis » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:00 pm

Probably the same result at the speed limit too (60km/h) in the event of a car pulling out, just a little more chance of avoidance from the riders.

Calls for bike rego in the comments section of the article? I didn't read down too far.
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.
User avatar
bychosis
 
Posts: 2314
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby The 2nd Womble » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:11 pm

Oxford wrote:
The 2nd Womble wrote:They do apply in Qld.

not in Qld they don't, only apply to motor vehicle offences.
Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Driver Licensing) Regulation 1999 wrote:demerit points offence means an offence, other than an offence committed by a person while riding a bicycle, against a provision mentioned in schedule 3.

<edit> didn't see find_bruce's post until I refreshed the screen.

I really wish the police would familiarse themselves with the laws they are supposed to enforce before going off half cocked. whilst the act is seemingly stupid and they deserve to be fined, demerit points do not apply and the police should know this. how many fines are actually issued by police that are not valid in some way I wonder? I'd say plenty going by this article.

I distinctly remember cyclists in Townsville being issued with fines including demerit points and licence suspensions for riding DUI along the Ross River and for not wearing helmets, however this was 10+ years ago. I must brush up on this me thinks.
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves
User avatar
The 2nd Womble
 
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby ldrcycles » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:17 pm

jules21 wrote:
Supt Vanderbyl said the actions of the two cyclists were an accident waiting to happen.

"All it takes is for a car or truck to pull out in front of them and then we are dealing with a fatality," Supt Vanderbyl said.

yeah, but no one did hit them? doesn't that mean no offense was committed? :roll:


The offense was the cyclists breaking the speed limit.


bychosis wrote:
Calls for bike rego in the comments section of the article? I didn't read down too far.


Surprisingly no, although there are a couple blathering on about cyclists don't belong on the roads, they are a danger to everyone blah blah.
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby jules21 » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:21 pm

ldrcycles wrote:
jules21 wrote:
Supt Vanderbyl said the actions of the two cyclists were an accident waiting to happen.

"All it takes is for a car or truck to pull out in front of them and then we are dealing with a fatality," Supt Vanderbyl said.

yeah, but no one did hit them? doesn't that mean no offense was committed? :roll:


The offense was the cyclists breaking the speed limit.

hmm.. you're probably right. hey, wait a minute :x
Image
User avatar
jules21
 
Posts: 8729
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: deep in the pain cave

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby Mulger bill » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:27 pm

jules21 wrote:yeah, but no one did hit them? doesn't that mean no offense was committed? :roll:


BAM! Got it in one 8)
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby Xplora » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:36 pm

Strangely enough, no one says that a car doing 60 or 70 in a legal fashion is ALSO an accident waiting to happen given the same circumstances? :roll: FFS :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Bike Risk Kettle, meet Car Risk Black. :?
Xplora
 
Posts: 6173
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:33 pm
Location: TL;DR

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby ldrcycles » Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:50 pm

Except that the car has a tonne or more of metal cage, side intrusion bars, seatbelts, air bags, and the cyclist has a lump of foam on their head and some skin tight lycra. Oh and fingerless gloves maybe.
When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments- Elizabeth West.
User avatar
ldrcycles
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:19 pm
Location: Kin Kin, Queensland

Re: Rogue cyclists clocked at 89kmh

Postby find_bruce » Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:04 pm

Isn't the real difference that a car driver exceeding the speed limit is a danger to other road users, a speeding cyclist is mainly a risk to himself or herself.
Image
User avatar
find_bruce
 
Posts: 3770
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Next

Return to Cycling Safety and Advocacy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit