Cyclist Crash Facts 2011 (New Zealand)

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22396
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Cyclist Crash Facts 2011 (New Zealand)

Postby Aushiker » Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:52 pm

Image

In August 2012 New Zealand's Ministry for Transport published Cyclist Crash Facts 2011. The report contains cyclist crash statistics for the year ended 31 December 2010. It includes information about fatalities, injuries and crash types.


I like that they do the statistics based on time and not mileage.

More details at the Cycling Resource Centre.

Andrew

User avatar
KonaCommuter
Posts: 978
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:28 pm
Location: Brisbane Northside

Re: Cyclist Crash Facts 2011 (New Zealand)

Postby KonaCommuter » Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:14 pm

Thanks for the link
2012 Oppy A4

User avatar
Howzat
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:08 pm

Re: Cyclist Crash Facts 2011 (New Zealand)

Postby Howzat » Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:31 am

Sad to see cyclists overrepresented, but you have to wonder just what it is that puts motorcyclists so far out there.

human909
Posts: 9810
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am

Re: Cyclist Crash Facts 2011 (New Zealand)

Postby human909 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:17 am

Howzat wrote:Sad to see cyclists overrepresented, but you have to wonder just what it is that puts motorcyclists so far out there.
There is the obvious influence of speed, increased vulnerability and an ignorant and incompetent driving population.

However, never underestimate the influence of the influence of population bias. In automobile fatalities young risk males are massively over represented. Those that love risk seem to get themselves killed at a phenomenal rate. And guess who are the main people who take up motorcycle riding? So simply by the population bias we would naturally expect a significantly higher accident and fatality rate than the objective riskiness of motorcycling. If the bulk of the population rode motorcycles/scooters you would expect a significantly lower death and injury rate. :wink:

This is the danger of looking at statistics and assuming it represents the objective riskiness of the activity. Likewise cycling in Australia would be similarly biased (though not to the same degree) as there is still a strong bias toward high speed higher risk riding.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users