Things parents say why kids not riding to school

[Aushiker]

This is an American video but the stats on the number of kids actually riding to school are similar here in Australia. It seems we have a long way to go to change attitudes.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WZPnFaz7jA&hd=1[/youtube]

Andrew

[R12RT]

Despite the best attempts by my wife and myself to encourage our 12 year old to ride to school, he refuses.

We believe that it is peer pressure that is stopping him.

Times have changed. When I went to high school in the late 70's there would be a couple of hundred bikes parked in the bike racks. At my son's high school there would be less than thirty.

[mitzikatzi]

Despite the best attempts by my wife and myself to encourage our 12 year old to ride to school, he refuses.

We believe that it is peer pressure that is stopping him.

...snip..

At least walking is still exercise.

[skull]

Well if he doesn't ride make him walk

Sent from my not iDevice using Tapatalk 2

[il padrone]

A bit of a set-up really, but that cr#p is what so many parents will say.... when confronted with the crass-medja fear-mongered threats to their youngsters. The young kids were so much more believable.

I prefer the ideas presented in this:

[Aushiker]

A bit of a set-up really, but that cr#p is what so many parents will say.... when confronted with the crass-medja fear-mongered threats to their youngsters. The young kids were so much more believable.

It is made this way deliberately as it is "mocking" the comments made in focus groups by parents on the topic. If you check the video on YouTube you can get the background on it.

Andrew

[Crowz]

When I was at school (finished 09) there were maybe... 0 students who rode their bike. My situation is a lot different to others but I attended a school that made me wear long pants, tie etc and were particularly forceful making students wear the correct uniform in and out of the school grounds. Obviously no one wants to ride in 30 degrees in long pants and a button up shirt. Some schools need to take the blame here.

[il padrone]

I attended a school that made me wear long pants, tie etc and were particularly forceful making students wear the correct uniform in and out of the school grounds. Obviously no one wants to ride in 30 degrees in long pants and a button up shirt.

My 1972 form 3 (Year 9) photo, taken one February day. That's me in the top row, third from left. We rode bikes to school, and even in summer. Blazers were only mandatory in winter at our school though. Ties, always required (in and outside school), short pants were a summer choice but for most of 'the cool set' long pants were essential wear.

Some schools need to take the blame here.

Suck it up kids!!

[warthog1]

My 1972 form 3 (Year 9) photo, taken one February day. That's me in the top row, third from left.

Niice Mullet on the bloke directly in front of you and on the right. He was way ahead of his time

[il padrone]

Binnsey always did it in style. However the mullet was a standard mid-70s thing - lots of others had it soon after.

[warthog1]

It was around in the mid 80s when I went to high school. I figured that was its time. There you go, it hung around for a while.

I rode to school all through secondary. It was quicker than the crowded bloody bus by a long way. Must get my kids cracking this term.

[tamagojo]

When I was in the last two years of high school I either had to pay for the bus fee from my own money or ride the 7 km to school. Even back then I was a cheapskate.

I just pulled on shorts under the school dress in summer or wore the trouser version of the uniform in winter.

[hkgts]

Finished high school in 99. I rode 10k round trip rain hale or shine from year 8 till the day I got my drivers license in year 12. We all rode for the freedom before/after school... didn't want yo mamma knowing what da boyz got up too!

[AndrewBurns]

My school was only maybe 5 or 6km away but I got the train every day. I didn't have or ride bikes at the time but in retrospect if I had I would have ridden a lot more I think. We had to wear long pants, shirts and ties all year 'round too but it's not hard to put some clothes in a pannier and get changed like I do for work now. Same with uni, it's such a short ride (maybe 10km) I kick myself these days for taking a long bus trip there and back every time instead of riding, there was even a shower in my faculty building.

[WestcoastPete]

Have you seem the new Ford Territory ad? It highlights the appeal of the entertainment system saying something like "the kids love the DVD player. They just want to put it on all the time, even for five minute trips." Pan to mind numbed kids not interfering with the grownup conversation. Easy parenting.

Five minute trip? Why are you driving? What are you possibly going to see on a DVD in that time? Why are you so scared to engage with your kids in person?

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

[birdbrain]

Warthog wrote:

Niice Mullet on the bloke directly in front of you and on the right. He was way ahead of his time.

It was neat. Did you also notice that there was only one overweight kid in that photo.

[PA]

Warthog wrote:

Niice Mullet on the bloke directly in front of you and on the right. He was way ahead of his time.

It was neat. Did you also notice that there was only one overweight kid in that photo.

Back row, third from the left?

[Oxford]

Finally got around to watching the video earlier today. The parents whose quotes were used are suffering from what I call umbilical cord disease. Its where the parents cannot let go of their children and need to be involved even if that means making inane reasons for why the kids cannot do things, the parents need their lifeline to their children. I know I personally suffer from it a little at times when I restrict my children and most parents on here if they were honest would also admit to it to some degree. The problem is kids then lose their independence (and confidence). I constantly say to both daughters I know there is no umbilical attaching you to us (parents), I was there when you were born, I cut it myself just to be sure.

[BigPete]

In theory, parents can be charged for allowing their young children to ride or even walk to school. They are in effect not providing sufficient supervision for their children’s safety.
With this in mind why would anyone not drive their children to school?
They are supervised and the parent is the best driver in the world!

[Mulger bill]

In theory, parents can be charged for allowing their young children to ride or even walk to school.

Citation please.

[BigPete]

It is the responsibility of parents to ensure the safety of their children. Just as you can not leave a child alone in their home, in a car or play ground/park, it could also be argued that allowing a child to ride to school by themselves or unsupervised is also evading the duty of care that parents must give their children.
Unfortunately Australians consider it safer to be driven to school than to ride. This maybe due in part to the way we place the bulk of the responsibility of rider safety on the rider/supervisor when it should be on the motorised traffic. In addition the NSW Centre for Road Safety http://ols2.rta.nsw.gov.au/ebus/docs/rescat/pdf/8/1180/45092307safetyonwheels0409.pdf recommends that children up to 10 years of age not ride on a road, near vehicles or near driveways. This would suggest that they don’t ride to school.
While society thinks like that so too will courts and should some ‘do gooder’ decide to bring a case on this, there is the possibility of a parent being found guilty of neglect.

[il padrone]

In theory, parents can be charged for allowing their young children to ride or even walk to school

You have got to be joking !! Forgot the TIC?

Allowing your children (at an appropriate age and situation) to ride a bike to school or walk, on residential streets along a well thought out route, is a part of good parenting to engender independence and confidence in your children.

They are supervised and the parent is the best driver in the world!

There are an awful lot of parents who definitely are not, judging by many motorists' behaviour.

[Oxford]

In theory, parents can be charged for allowing their young children to ride or even walk to school

You have got to be joking !! Forgot the TIC?

Allowing your children (at an appropriate age and situation) to ride a bike to school or walk, on residential streets along a well thought out route, is a part of good parenting to engender independence and confidence in your children.

They are supervised and the parent is the best driver in the world!

There are an awful lot of parents who definitely are not, judging by many motorists' behaviour.

He is not joking, though this is the UK, no reason why it couldn't happen here, funny how the same words you used are in the article, independence and confidence, I agree with you:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... alone.html

[westab]

I hear about the safety of our kids and agree - but not allowing our kids to develop independence and learn "safety" by taking reasonable risks is poor parenting. Yes this will mean different things for each and every one of our children.

With my no.1 kid going to high school next year we are looking to let her ride and finding a safe path and riding with her as an option. We will give her this as a way she can choose what is safe for her.

The way I see it (IMHO) is the price for no freedom is kids who don't take responsibility for themselves.

[BigPete]

In theory, parents can be charged for allowing their young children to ride or even walk to school

You have got to be joking !! Forgot the TIC?

Joking I am not. I don’t see much difference between leaving a child alone in a car for a minute or two while the parent ducks into a shop to purchase something to allowing a child to cycle to school. If anything I would consider it safer for the child to be in the car than riding, however people have been charged for leaving children unattended in cars.

In Queensland, Section 364A of the Criminal Code makes it a crime to leave children under 12 years old alone for an unreasonable amount of time without supervision.

Allowing your children (at an appropriate age and situation) to ride a bike to school or walk, on residential streets along a well thought out route, is a part of good parenting to engender independence and confidence in your children.

Agree. However what one person may see as a short ride to school and using well thought out routes may appear to others as a long and dangerous ride. As the title of this thread suggests and the comments within it (the video of the OP), there are many people who consider riding to school dangerous. It appears to me that our society is ever more wanting to protect children and has got to the stage where some people feel children should not be out of sight for even a few seconds. As I said earlier in this thread, the justice system reflects societies thinking. It is just a matter of time before the police charge a parent for neglect.

They are supervised and the parent is the best driver in the world!

There are an awful lot of parents who definitely are not, judging by many motorists' behaviour.

This was said tongue in cheek.