HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

open topic, for anything cycling related.

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby master6 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:34 am

master6 wrote:The good news for Australia is that only one of our number has offended here.



I guess that I will never succeed in comedy :cry:
master6
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:37 pm
Location: depends on who is asking, and why.

by BNA » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:02 am

BNA
 

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Chuck » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:02 am

master6 wrote:
master6 wrote:The good news for Australia is that only one of our number has offended here.



I guess that I will never succeed in comedy :cry:


In cyberspace no-one can hear you laugh.
Image
FPR Ragamuffin
User avatar
Chuck
 
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Hiding in the bunch

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby greyhoundtom » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:27 am

master6 wrote:
master6 wrote:The good news for Australia is that only one of our number has offended here.



I guess that I will never succeed in comedy :cry:

We may be too worried that there could be more closet PED users we don’t know about as yet. :cry:

I guess for some it touched a raw nerve instead of the funny bone. :?
User avatar
greyhoundtom
 
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
Location: Narre Warren, Victoria

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby warthog1 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:32 am

eldavo wrote:
Personally I liked the rider with dead body in basement stinking things up for UCI analogy, he sounded like he was speaking from experience with the detail =D
.


+1
That was hilarious, such a good analogy for the UCI. "The longer you have the dead body in the basement the more it starts to stink". Pretty foul odour coming from the UCI's basement. They must be going through some brut and air freshener by the pallet load.
User avatar
warthog1
 
Posts: 2804
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Ross » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:42 am

DaveOZ wrote:Worth watching the 4 Corners prog if you missed it.



http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/ ... 608613.htm
Image
User avatar
Ross
 
Posts: 3732
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:53 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby philip » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:58 am

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/despite ... -supporter
Phil Ligget seems awfully confused and seems like he's finding it very difficult to accept the truth. Pretty sad. He didn't look good on 4 corners.
User avatar
philip
 
Posts: 1604
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:57 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby greyhoundtom » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:09 am

philip wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/despite-usadas-evidence-liggett-remains-armstrongs-supporter
Phil Ligget seems awfully confused and seems like he's finding it very difficult to accept the truth. Pretty sad. He didn't look good on 4 corners.

I feel genuinely sorry for the guy..........some on here have expressed their disappointment in seeing one of their hero’s take a dive of a mile high cliff............I can only imagine how Phil Ligget would feel under these circumstances as he obviously idolised LA. :cry:
User avatar
greyhoundtom
 
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:28 am
Location: Narre Warren, Victoria

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Xplora » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:51 am

philip wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/despite-usadas-evidence-liggett-remains-armstrongs-supporter
Phil Ligget seems awfully confused and seems like he's finding it very difficult to accept the truth. Pretty sad. He didn't look good on 4 corners.

Cycling is this man's LIFE. He's done commentary right through the bad old days. He probably rode through the bad old days too. I'm sure LA has looked him straight in the eye and said "I'm clean". That's enough for many people. I don't think you could be so cynical as to doubt one of the legends of the sport when they look you in the eye (normally the common man's test of truth) and have spent time with you.

For Lance to go down probably means the death of cycling for Phil. And I think he'd be right.
Xplora
 
Posts: 5916
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:33 pm
Location: TL;DR

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby sogood » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:52 am

warthog1 wrote:That was hilarious, such a good analogy for the UCI. "The longer you have the dead body in the basement the more it starts to stink". Pretty foul odour coming from the UCI's basement. They must be going through some brut and air freshener by the pallet load.

But if it was left long enough, it'll turn into fossils for the archeologists. :mrgreen:
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16929
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby sogood » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:59 am

greyhoundtom wrote:I feel genuinely sorry for the guy..........some on here have expressed their disappointment in seeing one of their hero’s take a dive of a mile high cliff............I can only imagine how Phil Ligget would feel under these circumstances as he obviously idolised LA. :cry:

I don't so much feel for the individual but the whole road cycling fraternity. To me, it's unfortunate how LA has been portrayed as the sole source of the problem. Fact is, it's the culture of the time, one that started way before LA joined the racing scene there in Euroland. The only difference being, a hard nosed Texan and an intellectually capable Johan Bruyneel combined and took the view that was how it was, and worked the system for all its worth.

Looking forward to the turning of a new page.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16929
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby herzog » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:11 am

Wow Liggett is starting to look like part of the problem. An enabler.
User avatar
herzog
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:50 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Jean » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:24 am

Xplora wrote:
philip wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/despite-usadas-evidence-liggett-remains-armstrongs-supporter
Phil Ligget seems awfully confused and seems like he's finding it very difficult to accept the truth. Pretty sad. He didn't look good on 4 corners.

Cycling is this man's LIFE. He's done commentary right through the bad old days. He probably rode through the bad old days too. I'm sure LA has looked him straight in the eye and said "I'm clean". That's enough for many people. I don't think you could be so cynical as to doubt one of the legends of the sport when they look you in the eye (normally the common man's test of truth) and have spent time with you.

For Lance to go down probably means the death of cycling for Phil. And I think he'd be right.


Agreed. It looked and sounded like he still has some mental adjustments to make about it all. To be honest I thought he looked like he'd been crying, though it was probably just the way he appeared on camera.
User avatar
Jean
 
Posts: 1472
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:26 am
Location: Canberra

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby sogood » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:40 am

herzog wrote:Wow Liggett is starting to look like part of the problem. An enabler.

That's a big rough. :roll:
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16929
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:01 am

master6 wrote:The good news for Australia is that only one of our number has offended here.

Glad to know you were actually joking.
User avatar
Alex Simmons/RST
Expert
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby clackers » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:01 am

sogood wrote:
herzog wrote:Wow Liggett is starting to look like part of the problem. An enabler.

That's a big rough. :roll:


Well, some might say an apologist at best, SoGood, a sock puppet at worst. Enabler not so bad a moniker by comparison.

Check out Phil's attitude back in August.

http://www.inthegc.com/2012/08/film-friday-liggett-idiot-talks-lance.html

Phil was a journalist "inside" Lance's circle, Rupert Guinness one "outside".
User avatar
clackers
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:48 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:03 am

Jean wrote:
Xplora wrote:
philip wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/despite-usadas-evidence-liggett-remains-armstrongs-supporter
Phil Ligget seems awfully confused and seems like he's finding it very difficult to accept the truth. Pretty sad. He didn't look good on 4 corners.

Cycling is this man's LIFE. He's done commentary right through the bad old days. He probably rode through the bad old days too. I'm sure LA has looked him straight in the eye and said "I'm clean". That's enough for many people. I don't think you could be so cynical as to doubt one of the legends of the sport when they look you in the eye (normally the common man's test of truth) and have spent time with you.

For Lance to go down probably means the death of cycling for Phil. And I think he'd be right.


Agreed. It looked and sounded like he still has some mental adjustments to make about it all. To be honest I thought he looked like he'd been crying, though it was probably just the way he appeared on camera.

And that was before USADA's RD document was released.

Since then he's back to his old BS making stupid statements - latest is the "SMS from an eminent scientist". Liggett needs to go and I sure don't want my tax payer funded TV stations spending another $ on this fool (or on Sherwen, who is actually worse).
User avatar
Alex Simmons/RST
Expert
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby clackers » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:10 am

master6 wrote:The good news for Australia is that only one of our number has offended here.


I did get your humour, Master6, but just wondering, while Matt's stood down, will the assistant Neil Stephens be replacing him? (cough) Festina (cough) :D

Lucky our cycling body isn't as compromised as the UCI:

http://www.theage.com.au/sport/cycling/ ... 27n0p.html :)
User avatar
clackers
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:48 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby sogood » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:26 am

clackers wrote:Lucky our cycling body isn't as compromised as the UCI

Given what has happened, I don't have faith with any of the associated organizations. Everyone is under the cloud unfortunately.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16929
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Chuck » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:33 am



Heads in the sand down here too :|

Excellent article thanks for sharing clackers.
Image
FPR Ragamuffin
User avatar
Chuck
 
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Hiding in the bunch

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Chuck » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:37 am

sogood wrote:
clackers wrote:Lucky our cycling body isn't as compromised as the UCI

Given what has happened, I don't have faith with any of the associated organizations. Everyone is under the cloud unfortunately.


Sarcasm :idea:
Image
FPR Ragamuffin
User avatar
Chuck
 
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Hiding in the bunch

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby sogood » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:47 am

Chuck wrote:Sarcasm :idea:

So it would be.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16929
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Chuck » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:22 am

sogood wrote:
Looking forward to the turning of a new page.



Let's not be too hasty in turning that page. This needs to play right out, all the nasty secrets need to be exposed. The UCI need to act as enablers in this process. There can be no self preservation in their response to USADA's extensive report, they must take ownership for their complicity in all of this. Any shortcuts taken now will see the sport taken back to where it was in 1999.

There is a massive opportunity now for cycling to purge itself. Let's hope the UCI are brave and surprise us with an honest and transparent response.
Image
FPR Ragamuffin
User avatar
Chuck
 
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Hiding in the bunch

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby g-boaf » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:53 am

philip wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/despite-usadas-evidence-liggett-remains-armstrongs-supporter
Phil Ligget seems awfully confused and seems like he's finding it very difficult to accept the truth. Pretty sad. He didn't look good on 4 corners.


Maybe I'm mistaken, I've never met Ligget, but to me - cycling seems to be his world - he lives and breathes it. I think he knows the truth and I also suspect it upsets and angers him. The body language seemed to suggest it.

I've just watched the Four Corners version of propaganda (you have the pro-LA propaganda and the anti-LA propaganda, with the truth somewhere in the middle) and it doesn't look good. It's a good time for cycling to purge itself of these problems, but will it, and can it do so? I don't believe so because science is always a step ahead of drug-testing. It's like the F1 regulations designed to slow cars down. Regardless of what they do, the engineers find a way to make them go even faster than before. While there is so much money in sponsorship and that desire to win, those with the best science behind them will still win.

Cycling won't die however, for all the people who suggest it will. It's still a great sport. People will still ride and race bikes regardless of what happens.
User avatar
g-boaf
 
Posts: 3955
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby Jono L. » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:17 pm

sogood wrote:
herzog wrote:Wow Liggett is starting to look like part of the problem. An enabler.

That's a big rough. :roll:

It's not rough, it is 100% correct.

Go back and listen to any TDF commentary, whenever allegations were raised by people such as Emma O'Reilly, Betsy Andreu, Lemond, David Walsh, Kimmage

Phil and Paul were the first to jump all over them and their 'ludicrous' claims.

They made it so easy for joe blow on their couch who did not want to have to think too hard, or have their beliefs challenged to just throw all the accusers in the same 'loony' basket and forget about them.

They made it easy, for the Armstrong PR campaign to destroy the lives of people who did nothing more than tell the truth.

Whether Phil was aware of this or he really was just a blustering old fool who took the Armstrong bait hook line and sinker, is another debate. But of course he enabled it. And he is very much part of the problem. If he chooses to continue to be part of the problem, then that's even worse.
Jono L.
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:12 pm

Re: HOLY showtime!!! Amstrong accepts life ban!!!

Postby sogood » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:26 pm

Jono L. wrote:It's not rough, it is 100% correct.

Guess the questions, whether one should apply the rule of guilty until proven otherwise? If that's upheld, then I don't see too much wrong for a journalist to defend the position. He could be as much in the wood as many many others. If lynch mob mentality is acceptable, then that's a different criteria. It's so easy at this point to call "I told you so". In any case, I would agree that the UCI has some explaining to do given that they have access to all the data first hand.
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
User avatar
sogood
 
Posts: 16929
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU

PreviousNext

Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AdsPear, bigfriendlyvegan, Bing [Bot], Lukeyboy, MSNbot Media



Popular Bike Shops
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Ground Effect Ground Effect NZ
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Ebay Ebay AU

“Bicycles BNA Twitter
“Bicycles BNA Facebook
“Google+ BNA Google+
“Bicycles BNA Newsletter

> FREE BNA Stickers
> BNA Cycling Kit