find_bruce wrote:find_bruce wrote:approaching in the way the Dr Ashenden suggests & has been adopted by team Sky
philip wrote:I'm pretty sure Dr Ashenden has a similar view to you? From what I understood from what he's been saying is that the stuff that Sky was doing was useless/not productive.
THanks for clarifying that Phillip - I didn't see cycling central was merely going on the question above - "
Shouldnt you have asked him straight out "did you use PED's""
The likelihood of someone being evasive to questions has more to do with the nature of the consequences of telling the truth, than the questions per se.
Ashenden: Tell us the truth, and give us all the details about everything that went on, how, when, who, how obtained, administered, who else etc, so you can help us learn more and help stop this in the future. Help us by becoming part of the solution.
Sky & CA: Tells us the truth, and if the answer is you admit to doping, you're fired.
Both ask the same question, but which is more likely to elicit the truth?