Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Nothing to see here, move along....
Sorry, was just absent mindedly channelling my inner brentono
Latest Reviews and Articles
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:24 pm
Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Nothing to see here, move along....
Postby ningnangnong » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:26 pm
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:50 pm
ningnangnong wrote:Rabobank to cease sponsoring professional cycling teams - http://www.rabosport.com/news/item/25789
I wonder if we'll see many other sponsors follow suit?
Postby sogood » Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:07 pm
Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Not to mention all the potential sponsors that will definitely stay away...
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby find_bruce » Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:15 pm
Postby exadios » Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:15 am
Alex Simmons/RST wrote:The 2nd Womble wrote:Remember that until this week, Australian riders had been beyond reproach. I'm not naive.
Then we have evidence of a multiverse.
Postby greyhoundtom » Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:20 am
exadios wrote:Alex Simmons/RST wrote:The 2nd Womble wrote:Remember that until this week, Australian riders had been beyond reproach. I'm not naive.
Then we have evidence of a multiverse.
A question to all theoretical physicist on the board: What is the least number of universes necessary to ensure that no Australian professional cyclists have doped?
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:15 pm
exadios wrote:Alex Simmons/RST wrote:The 2nd Womble wrote:Remember that until this week, Australian riders had been beyond reproach. I'm not naive.
Then we have evidence of a multiverse.
A question to all theoretical physicist on the board: What is the least number of universes necessary to ensure that no Australian professional cyclists have doped?
Postby exadios » Tue Oct 23, 2012 12:08 am
Postby damhooligan » Tue Oct 23, 2012 12:30 am
exadios wrote:Cycling’s governing body agrees to strip Lance Armstrong of his 7 Tour de France titles.
“Lance Armstrong has no place in cycling and he deserves to be forgotten in cycling.”
Postby ldrcycles » Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:28 am
damhooligan wrote:
Dont forget it.. learn from it
And use it to stop doping!!
This should not be forgotten.. ever!!
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:17 am
Postby JustJames » Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:25 am
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:30 am
Yeah - there was no reason for Phil to be concerned.""I am like everybody else. I had no idea such an in-depth drug scheme was taking place.
"If there were any lingering doubts as far as I was concerned, when Nike and all his sponsors pulled out, but continued to donate to Livestrong, quite clearly a deal was struck.
"We’ll donate to Livestrong Lance, providing you leave the company as chairman’.
"That’s about the nearest I think we’re going to get to a confession from Lance. And if he does confess, that leaves him wide open to a myriad legal entanglements."
Postby The 2nd Womble » Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:43 am
Postby twizzle » Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:56 pm
JustJames wrote:Richard Glover on ABC yesterday evening (paraphrased):
"Of course the real worry in the wake of the Lance Armstrong debacle is that young drug users will now start to think that cycling is cool."
Postby schroeds » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:56 pm
Postby Ross » Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:23 am
Postby twizzle » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:17 pm
Ross wrote:Kimmage counter attacks by suing Verbruggen and McQuaid
Read more: http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/13195 ... z2B0pabEQH
Postby schroeds » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:43 pm
Postby clackers » Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:30 am
Postby Ross » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:28 pm
Postby sogood » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:36 pm
Ross wrote:The lawyer that is acting for Kimmage (who coincidently is the same one that SKINS Chairman Jamie Fuller is using) is reportedly doing it for free.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby find_bruce » Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:57 pm
Ross wrote:The lawyer that is acting for Kimmage (who coincidently is the same one that SKINS Chairman Jamie Fuller is using) is reportedly doing it for free.
sogood wrote:Nothing is for free, especially lawyers. It's a calculated gamble by the lawyers and will take a deep cut in the financial transaction should they win or settle.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
The largest cycling discussion forum in Australia for all things bike; from new riders to seasoned bike nuts, the Australian Cycling Forums are a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.