Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

User avatar
jacob_T
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby jacob_T » Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:57 pm

Hey.

So after a pretty close call this afternoon riding on the inside of a car in a bike only lane, and having the car turn left over the top of me, I have a few questions.

Does anyone know what the law is regarding who has to give way? Did a quick search and found http://www.sydneycyclist.com/forum/topi ... oss-a}this... but it's not particularly informative.

Admittedly, I feel like I was probably in the wrong in this instance, but it also made me realise I have no idea what the etiquette/law is in these situations, so just interested to hear what everyone's thoughts are?

P.s. I'm in Queensland, so particularly interested in the road laws here.

User avatar
KonaCommuter
Posts: 978
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:28 pm
Location: Brisbane Northside

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby KonaCommuter » Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:04 pm

Here are some links to a Brisbane Cyclist that was collected by a truck in a similar scenario as you've described. Note that the Policeman gave the truck driver $400 worth of tickets. Also note that another motorist raced to the defence of the truck driver to blame the victim (cyclist)



http://www.brisbanecyclist.com/profiles/blogs/crunch" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.brisbanecyclist.com/profiles ... nch-part-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.brisbanecyclist.com/profiles ... nch-part-2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.brisbanecyclist.com/profiles ... 3-progress" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.brisbanecyclist.com/profiles ... nch-part-4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2012 Oppy A4

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby il padrone » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:59 pm

Oxford wrote:illegal because they are indicating and you may not pass a car on the left whilst it is indicating a left turn.....
...and turning left.

Of course at what point you define a vehicle as actually turning left can be a tricky one. However if the vehicle is stationary and not able to move forwards while indicating you are legally OK. Myself I generally apply the car driver's technique and pass left lane traffic at intersections on the right side.

Going by the OP's description it seems like the driver has done the classic left-hook, zipping past then cutting left without allowing enough time for the cyclist in the bike lane.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Aushiker
Posts: 22388
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Walyalup land
Contact:

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby Aushiker » Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:04 pm

il padrone wrote:
Oxford wrote:illegal because they are indicating and you may not pass a car on the left whilst it is indicating a left turn.....
...and turning left.
Not that this is much use to the OP but in WA your statement is not actually correct and Oxford is more on the mark.

Regulation 122(4) applies ...

(4) The rider of a bicycle shall not ride past, or overtake, to the left of a vehicle that is making, or apparently about to make, a left turn, or is signalling a left turn. [my emphasis]
Modified penalty: 2 PU

Andrew
Andrew

User avatar
jacob_T
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby jacob_T » Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:02 am

Thanks for the responses.
So what would be the point where it becomes illegal?
If you were riding next to the car, they'd have to give way to you, yeah?
In my particular instance I was riding (downhill) at the same pace as the car, and my pedals were approximately in line with the rear of their car.
I could see the blinkers when they began indicating, but wasn't sure if I had to slow down till they turned, or they had to wait for me to pass.

dontazame
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:09 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby dontazame » Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:47 am

Any of these apply?

Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Road Rules) Regulation 2009

46 Giving a left change of direction signal
...
46(2) The driver must give the change of direction signal for long enough to give sufficient warning to other drivers and pedestrians.

140 No overtaking unless safe to do so
A driver must not overtake a vehicle unless—
(a) the driver has a clear view of any approaching traffic; and
(b) the driver can safely overtake the vehicle.

144 Keeping a safe distance when overtaking

A driver overtaking a vehicle—
(a) must pass the vehicle at a sufficient distance to avoid a collision with the vehicle or obstructing the path of the vehicle;..

User avatar
bychosis
Posts: 7244
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby bychosis » Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:06 am

Legalities aside, if you are traveling at near the speed of the vehicle and are in, or very nearly in, the vehicles blind spot as described you are tempting fate. Best not to stick around the rear half of a vehicle on the kerb side.
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.

uppo75
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:08 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby uppo75 » Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:11 pm

Could some one then please tell me who should give way in the following scenario. in Brisbane QLD


My wife used to work at the Wesley Hospital.
She turned left from Land street, into Patrick Lane, to go into the Wesley Carpark.
There is no slip lane. There is a dedicated bike Lane.
There is lots and lots of bike traffic in the morning
She was always scared s#@tless that a cyclist would zoom past her as she was turning.


Does the bike lane override the rule, about not passing cars, who are indicating and turning left?
She said it was rare that a bike rider would actually stop behind her and wait for her to turn.
To those of you who use this particular route, please let us know, what you do and how you have interpreted the rules
Cheers
Uppo

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby il padrone » Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:16 pm

bychosis wrote:Legalities aside, if you are traveling at near the speed of the vehicle and are in, or very nearly in, the vehicles blind spot as described you are tempting fate. Best not to stick around the rear half of a vehicle on the kerb side.
+1


uppo75, yes the bike lane does take priority, it is a separate lane. I believe that in Victoria Rule 28 makes it pretty clear (Qld may differ, but I doubt it):
Victorian Road Rules wrote:28 Starting a left turn from a multi-lane road
(1) A driver turning left at an intersection from a multi-lane road must approach and enter the intersection from within the left lane unless⎯
(a) the driver is required or permitted to approach and enter the intersection from within another marked lane under rule 88(1), 92 or 159; or
(b) the driver is turning, at B lights or traffic arrows, in accordance with Division 2 of Part 17;
There are further exceptions if there is a multi-lane slip-lane and for drivers of long vehicles. It is legal for your wife to enter the bike lane for the last 50 metres before her turn and then turn from this, the left-most lane. She must give way to any cyclists in the bike lane before doing this of course, as for any lane changing maneuver.

For most people it is simply a case of indicating your intentions in advance and slowing down closer to the speed of bicycles to enable a smooth merge; rather than speeding to the turn, making a late indication and getting frustrated because you can't get through the bikes. Smooth steady driving always wins out.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

dontazame
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:09 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby dontazame » Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:45 pm

Sorry to disagree, but I don't "think' your wife can move into the bike lane up to 50 metres before her left turn, because its not 'necessary for the driver to drive in the lane'. (see below).

Unfortunately, I also suspect that 'turning left' does not require motion. If so bikes ought not overtake to the left of the front car (at least) indicating an intention to turn left.

If this is correct, it becomes 'interesting' when you think of the status of the car sitting behind the front car also wanting to turn left but needing to drive straight first. I'd think they are not 'turning left' and can be overtaken on the left until they reach the intersection.

I know the intersection and the number of bikes. I overtake on the left with 'the group' so cars can then have a doubt free go - not wanting to push in - just think its for the best.

Transport Operations (Road Use Management—Road Rules) Regulation 2009

158 Exceptions to driving in special purpose lanes etc.
(1) The driver of any vehicle may drive for up to the permitted distance in a bicycle lane, bus lane, tram lane, transit lane or truck lane if it is necessary for the driver to drive in the lane—
(a) to enter or leave the road;
(b) to enter a part of the road of 1 kind from a part of the road of another kind (for example, moving to or from a service road, the shoulder of the road or an emergency stopping lane); or
(c) to overtake a vehicle that is—
(i) turning right, or making a U-turn from the centre of the road; and
(ii) giving a right change of direction signal; or
(d) to enter a marked lane, or a part of the road where there is room for a line of traffic, other than animals, bicycles, motorbikes or motorised wheelchairs, from the side of the road.
...
(4) In this section permitted distance means—
(a) for a bicycle lane or a tram lane—50m;

28 Starting a left turn from a multi-lane road
(1) A driver turning left at an intersection from a multi-lane road
must approach and enter the intersection from within the left
lane unless...

(3) In this section—
left lane means—
(a) the marked lane nearest to the far left side of the road; or
...
marked lane, for a driver, does not include a special purpose
lane in which the driver is not permitted to drive.

Schedule 5
special purpose lane means a marked lane, or the part of a
marked lane, that is a bicycle lane, bus lane, emergency
stopping lane, tram lane, transit lane or truck lane.

141 No overtaking etc. to the left of a vehicle
...
(2) The rider of a bicycle must not ride past, or overtake, to the
left of a vehicle that is turning left and is giving a left change
of direction signal.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby il padrone » Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:28 pm

OK, dontazame your qualifiers are correct and present in the Victorian Road Rules as I read it. But all this seems at odds with Rule 158
Victorian Road Rules wrote:158 Exceptions to driving in special purpose lanes etc.
(1) The driver of any vehicle may drive for up to the permitted distance in a bicycle lane, bus lane, tram lane, transit lane or truck lane if it is necessary for the driver to drive in the lane—
(a) to enter or leave the road; or
(b) to enter a part of the road of one kind from a part of the road of another kind (for example, moving to or from a service road, the shoulder of the road or an emergency stopping lane)
I would read entering or leaving the road as including turning into another road, but maybe someone else can clear this up. I still think it is better practice to merge into the bike lane, but if you don't there still remains a general requirement to give way when entering another lane. I believe left-turning drivers must be aware of, and give way to, cyclists close to them in the bike lane.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

dontazame
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:09 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby dontazame » Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:16 am

I would read entering or leaving the road as including turning into another road, but maybe someone else can clear this up.
I'd agree unless there was some other provision. However, I say its irrelevant in the current case. When you look at the photo of the intersection, the 'bike lane' does not continue through the intersection; i.e. its not necessary for vehicles 'turning left' to dive in it.

I'm also not sure how I'd feel watching a car claim a bike lane for 50 metres before turning left. Maybe I'd be fine with it - karma.

I imagine a car that clobbers a cyclist in those situations is overtaking when its not safe to do (even if intending to turn left). Haven't looked into it.

thomashouseman
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:07 am
Location: Toongabbie NSW
Contact:

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby thomashouseman » Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:27 am

This happened to me....


User avatar
The 2nd Womble
Posts: 3058
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby The 2nd Womble » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:42 am

Commodore ftw
The only good Cyclist is a Bicyclist

Huge fan of booted RGers who just can't help themselves

zero
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby zero » Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:12 am

Oxford wrote:so dontazame if you are correct and there are enough cyclists riding along the bike lane, conceivably a car could never turn left as it has to give way to all cyclists passing through. clearly that is not the case nor the intention of the regulations.
Whether or not the cyclelane is a legally lane or not (in some jurisdiction the term multilane road is defined to not include cyclelanes), its certainly a line of traffic, and if you are outside of that line of traffic you certainly have to give way to vehicles in that line of traffic to enter it. The same applies to cyclists trying to turn right beginning from a cyclelane. ie the restriction on motorists right-passing me when I am signalling a right turn realistically only exists when I'm not performing the lane or line change prior to the turn.

The law would strictly cover the scenario where the car slows down and indicates before turning left, and a cyclist behind the car responds to the car slowing down by moving over and attempting to left pass. Other circumstances are at best going to be both at fault.

wellington_street
Posts: 1791
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:25 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby wellington_street » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:12 pm

Interesting discussion and why I really don't like it when cycle lanes are continued right through to the stop line at junctions on the left side of left turning vehicles. I prefer the clearly defined situated where a car turning left must merge into a shared vehicle/cycle lane. Unfortunately these are few and far between!

As a driver, I have now learnt to enter the bike lane or shoulder on approach to the left turn before turning left from it. This has the benefit of preventing those who wish to tempt their removal from the gene pool from passing on the inside, as well as clearly showing my intention to turn. If it wasn't for reading this forum, I would never have learnt the need to enter the bike lane and I am definitely part of the minority as it is not clearly defined in any road rules or handbook.

As a cyclist, I will be very careful not to pass or draw alongside a vehicle with its left indicator on, unless I am in a cycle lane and the vehicles are stopped at a red light. Also, if there's no cycle lane, I never pass a vehicle with its left indicator on, on the left, as that is illegal in WA for good reason. That said, when I'm on the road it is generally 50km/h and below, any faster and I'm on the path, so your results may vary.

wellington_street
Posts: 1791
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:25 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby wellington_street » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:14 pm

This is one situation that needs some serious publicity to educate drivers.

dontazame
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:09 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby dontazame » Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:48 pm

so dontazame if you are correct and there are enough cyclists riding along the bike lane, conceivably a car could never turn left as it has to give way to all cyclists passing through. clearly that is not the case nor the intention of the regulations.
Not at all. Bikes cannot overtake on the left of a vehicle that is 'turning left' (etc). I suspect a vehicle is only 'turning left' once it reaches the intersection. So there might be 3 or four bikes next to the front car (that approached from behind) that have right of way over the front vehicle, and then another 3 or 4 by the time the second car arrives at the front, etc, etc.
Last edited by dontazame on Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wizdofaus
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am
Location: Kensington, Melbourne, VIC
Contact:

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby wizdofaus » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:26 pm

Just curious...is there a recognised method of marking a bike lane so that cars must not STOP in it (i.e., they must leave room for cyclists to move up to the front of the intersection), but do have right of way to cross it for turning?

There is http://goo.gl/maps/t8NcA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; of course, which is usually pretty full of cyclists around peak hour. Seems like an accident waiting to happen, but not sure what the stats are.

dontazame
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:09 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby dontazame » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:52 pm

Interesting discussion and why I really don't like it when cycle lanes are continued right through to the stop line at junctions on the left side of left turning vehicles.I prefer the clearly defined situated where a car turning left must merge into a shared vehicle/cycle lane. Unfortunately these are few and far between!
+1 They also normally make it illegal for the cyclist to 'claim the lane' and I sometimes wonder if that is their main intent.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22931
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby il padrone » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:22 pm

wizdofaus wrote:There is http://goo.gl/maps/t8NcA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; of course, which is usually pretty full of cyclists around peak hour. Seems like an accident waiting to happen, but not sure what the stats are.
Such bike lane treatments are reasonably common on inner Melbourne bike routes. I believe they generally work quite well but don't know of any stats. I certainly think they are clearer than the standard bike lane, like that shown by uppo75 in Brisbane, which is rather unclear to all users.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Xplora
Posts: 8272
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
Location: TL;DR

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby Xplora » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:02 pm

il padrone wrote:
wizdofaus wrote:There is http://goo.gl/maps/t8NcA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; of course, which is usually pretty full of cyclists around peak hour. Seems like an accident waiting to happen, but not sure what the stats are.
Such bike lane treatments are reasonably common on inner Melbourne bike routes. I believe they generally work quite well but don't know of any stats. I certainly think they are clearer than the standard bike lane, like that shown by uppo75 in Brisbane, which is rather unclear to all users.
That bike lane would have to be 2 and a half times as wide for me to consider using it. WAY too close to the doors.

User avatar
Howzat
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:08 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby Howzat » Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:19 pm

Oxford wrote:No point talking legislation from under the wheels of a car.
+1
zero wrote:As a driver, I have now learnt to enter the bike lane or shoulder on approach to the left turn before turning left from it.
Me too. While indicating, of course. Anything else essentially requires drivers to execute a lane-crossing turn that could left-hook riders. From the driver's perspective, behind and to the left is the hardest place to see cyclists, and from the rider's perspective, merging into the bike lane means there is time to see what the car is doing/planning to do.
wellington_street wrote:This is one situation that needs some serious publicity to educate drivers.
Those are the worst kinds of situations! :shock:
Last edited by Howzat on Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

zero
Posts: 3056
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:54 pm

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby zero » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:38 am

Xplora wrote:
il padrone wrote:
wizdofaus wrote:There is http://goo.gl/maps/t8NcA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; of course, which is usually pretty full of cyclists around peak hour. Seems like an accident waiting to happen, but not sure what the stats are.
Such bike lane treatments are reasonably common on inner Melbourne bike routes. I believe they generally work quite well but don't know of any stats. I certainly think they are clearer than the standard bike lane, like that shown by uppo75 in Brisbane, which is rather unclear to all users.
That bike lane would have to be 2 and a half times as wide for me to consider using it. WAY too close to the doors.
Those are all queued active cars. The lane is a lot wider near the parking stalls (though not wide enough).

Its a dumb arrangement because a road authority tried to paint 4 lanes + a cyclelane in space for 3 (the right turn pocket).
There is no continuation, so cyclists would have been safer to have been merged into the left through lane at that point.

The total net effect of the setup is to make casual riders feel more comfortable. I doubt it has any safety benefits. The next intersection looks like the kind of design that will entice casual riders into getting left hooked and killed by a truck (narrowing right at the intersection point).

human909
Posts: 9810
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am

Re: Cars turning left over a bicycle only lane

Postby human909 » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:54 am

Cars don't understand how to behave around bicycles.

-Bike lanes don't make this clear.
-The law can be ambiguous.
-Education is non existent.
-Quasi bike lanes which aren't bike lanes make the confusion worse


Last night I it was hilariousness and painful to watch a left turning car wait for two slow cyclists not in a bike lane to pass on his inside. Great, the car was looking and being cautious for cyclists. But it was clear that neither the motorists nor the cyclists knew how to behave.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users