Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Recumbents and all feet forward machines

Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby DentedHead » Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:11 pm

I've been umming and ahhing about how much camber to put into my third trike. Currently, it has next to none - a couple degrees at most (I lack a decent tool to measure the actual angle, though I can "eyeball" it pretty well), but it also has a narrower track than my first one, 32.5" from the hub centers. I've noticed many commercially built tadpoles have very little camber, and some have none. I understand what camber does, I'm simply pondering the importance of it.

Has anyone had a slightly or non-cambered wheel fail due to the lack of camber?
I'm about to go see what Tim Smiths, and Peter Elands sites have to say, but I'd appreciate any input/opinions.


Dent.
DentedHead
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:23 pm

by Forum Ads » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 pm

Forum Ads
 

Re: Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby RonK » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 pm

Read this article.
Cycle touring blog and tour journals: whispering wheels...
User avatar
RonK
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane, Queensland

Re: Tadpole trike design ponderings...

Postby DentedHead » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:30 pm

Thanks RonK, I was looking for that article in vain. It was the one I read when designing my first trike, and I found it great.

Dent.
DentedHead
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:23 pm


Return to Recumbents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

BNA on Facebook BNA on Facebook
BNA on Twitter BNA on Twitter





Bikes & Gear Online:
Torpedo 7 Cycling Express AU
Torpedo 7 Torpedo7 AU
Cell Bikes Cell Bikes AU
Chain Reaction Cycles CRC UK
Ebay Ebay AU
Wiggle Wiggle UK
Evans Cycles Evans Cycles UK
ProBikeKit ProBikeKit UK
JensonUSA Jenson USA
JensonUSA Competitive Cyclist