"Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Monday 03/12/2012
VRT News
http://www.deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/r ... erdoorrood
At 8 intersections in the Brussels region can cyclists in certain situations ride through a red light. This test project has received a positive evaluation from the Belgian Institute for Traffic Safety (BIVV) and will be expanded further. Ignoring a red light as a car driver can be expensive, obviously because it can be life threatening. For cyclists who want to turn right, such a red light is often not dangerous and simply lost time. Therefore a test project was run in Brussels from June to September with signs which gave cyclists permission to ride through red lights in certain circumstances.
There are two signs which make the exception possible. For one sign, a cyclist may turn right through a red light. For the other sign, a cyclist may also cycle straight through when the light is red. The latter only applies if there is no car traffic which must cross and go over the separated bike lane.
The BIVV has determined that the present signs have caused no traffic problems. The rule is 100% safe. The institute emphasized that the rules should not be normal for every situation. The Brussels Region has now selected 255 intersections for which a thorough one-to-one evaluation shall determine whether such signs can come.
"Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:43 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
"Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby rodneythellama » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:41 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby human909 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:52 pm
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15587
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby AUbicycles » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:56 pm
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:44 am
Re:
Postby lump_a_charcoal » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:07 pm
AUbicycles wrote:As cyclists we should also be aware that this is a dangerous argument, it is the same as arguing, hypothetically, that as a motorist breaking certain laws is safe - if it is up to every one to decide which laws to follow (regardless of which ones we agree with) then this doesn't help society.
I don't think anyone is suggesting that people should break laws, merely that just because a light is red, it doesn't mean that it is dangerous to cross.
Driving/riding to the conditions is no excuse for breaking laws, no matter how safe.
- WestcoastPete
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:59 pm
- Location: Peoples Republic of Coburg, Victoria
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby WestcoastPete » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:15 pm
They work very well in my opinion, and I haven't heard of them increasing the risk of accidents. People often don't actually "stop" at them though, much like they do with stop signs...
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re:
Postby human909 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:16 pm
It certainly isn't a dangerous argument. It is the truth. In fact it is up to everyone to decide which laws to follow. It is also up to society to decide which laws it chooses to enforce. This has been discussed extensively on these forums, maybe you missed it.AUbicycles wrote:As cyclists we should also be aware that this is a dangerous argument, it is the same as arguing, hypothetically, that as a motorist breaking certain laws is safe - if it is up to every one to decide which laws to follow (regardless of which ones we agree with) then this doesn't help society.
If you look for traffic and dangers before you proceed then there is little risk in ignoring red lights. We all do it at non signalled intersections, the presence of signals doesn't suddenly change physics.
- WestcoastPete
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:59 pm
- Location: Peoples Republic of Coburg, Victoria
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby WestcoastPete » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:20 pm
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/cy ... 311182.ece" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm
- Contact:
Re:
Postby high_tea » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:23 pm
No, it's not. The article is about making it lawful to ignore red lights under certain circumstances. Lousy headline though.AUbicycles wrote:As cyclists we should also be aware that this is a dangerous argument, it is the same as arguing, hypothetically, that as a motorist breaking certain laws is safe - if it is up to every one to decide which laws to follow (regardless of which ones we agree with) then this doesn't help society.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re:
Postby il padrone » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:57 pm
It is not. This was most certainly not the sort of scenario suggested by the original article. Only for cyclists, at intersections that have been selected and signed.AUbicycles wrote:that as a motorist breaking certain laws is safe - if it is up to every one to decide which laws to follow
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:23 pm
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby diggler » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:25 pm
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby Mulger bill » Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:27 pm
London Boy 29/12/2011
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Sydney (Rhodes to City Commuter)
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby Sydguy » Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:34 pm
Australians do not drive well, are almost down to the last motorist totally unaware of cyclists or how bicycles use roads. We get our licence without a real test and mostly without any professional training.
JM
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:43 am
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby rodneythellama » Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:43 pm
The headline is a bit sensationalist but I think the article makes a good contrast with the daily tele one which was recently posted.
In the news clip, they do make the point that if so many cyclists are running red lights, then perhaps it's the law which should be changed, not the cyclists. I suppose everyone has already made up their mind whether this is a good point or not. Sorry to drag up that old topic.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby human909 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:49 pm
Exactly. There is a reason why so many cyclists run red lights. Because its harmless!rodneythellama wrote:In the news clip, they do make the point that if so many cyclists are running red lights, then perhaps it's the law which should be changed, not the cyclists. I suppose everyone has already made up their mind whether this is a good point or not. Sorry to drag up that old topic.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7002
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby biker jk » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:00 pm
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15587
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby AUbicycles » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:01 pm
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby il padrone » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:05 pm
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby high_tea » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:12 pm
IME one reason is that lights will only change when the sensor detects a vehicle and it doesn't detect a bicycle (especially not the mostly-plastic kind). The solution in this case is better sensors.human909 wrote:Exactly. There is a reason why so many cyclists run red lights. Because its harmless!rodneythellama wrote:In the news clip, they do make the point that if so many cyclists are running red lights, then perhaps it's the law which should be changed, not the cyclists. I suppose everyone has already made up their mind whether this is a good point or not. Sorry to drag up that old topic.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby il padrone » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:36 pm
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby human909 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:41 pm
You are lso asomebody who breaks laws. Stop trying to label people. Furthermore it seems you missed a big "IF" in the description of the Belgium intersection. ie; cyclists are allowed to go IF there is no trafficbiker jk wrote:You red light runners are clutching at straws. As mentioned, we have left turn on red after stopping here already. Not a problem with that. But note that the case of going straight through a red legally only applies in Belgium where car traffic doesn't cross the separated bicycle line. That's not a normal intersection. Keep trying law breakers.
Your view is believing in a falsehood despite clear evidence to the contrary. I don't see how recognising the truth is counter-productive.AUbicycles wrote:I understand what everyone means but will stick to my view (in the context of todays media coverage where this idea would be counter-productive).
Yes the efficiency logic on many light cycles is absurd. If an intersection has been clear of traffic for quite some time and is still clear of traffic when you arrive at the intersection then it would be sensible for the light sequence to be triggered immediately in your favour. Unfortunately this isn't the case and sometimes you'll have to wait over a minute of an empty intersection before the lights decide to change. Meanwhile a "law breaker" like me long given up and pedalled onward.il padrone wrote:Also Australian traffic lights have extraordinarily long cycles. In the Netherlands the authorities have moved to shorter light cycles which work in cyclists' favour. A cyclist coming up to a traffic light with a push-button will generally only have to wait about 15 seconds before proceeding (not the outrageous ~3 minutes we struck on crossings along Melbourne's "premier" Capital City Trail )
- martinjs
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:54 pm
- Location: Fivebough, Leeton
- Contact:
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby martinjs » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:22 pm
Typical, so we complain about motorist being impatient and you prove there is NO difference between cyclist and motorist.Meanwhile a "law breaker" like me long given up and pedalled onward.
I suggest until YOU start obeying the law you STOP complaining a motorist who don't obey the law.He who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones mean
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby il padrone » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:35 pm
Well, yes. They are both human beings - with foibles, failings and self-interest. What's new there?martinjs wrote:Typical, so we complain about motorist being impatient and you prove there is NO difference between cyclist and motorist.
One of the things that lead to such behaviour is how the social organisation treats different people. People who are alienated, feel their interests are not looked after, feel they face threats, will be the ones to take short-cuts to exploit the system, as much as they can in their own interest. It's not necessarily right, not legal, but it's what happens.
Sound familiar? Maybe out on the open roads of Leeton you don't face the same degree of aggressive traffic behaviour, the same disadvantageous road systems.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15587
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby AUbicycles » Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:46 pm
- Alien27
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:59 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby Alien27 » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:18 am
For what it's worth +1AUbicycles wrote:As cyclists we should also be aware that this is a dangerous argument, it is the same as arguing, hypothetically, that as a motorist breaking certain laws is safe - if it is up to every one to decide which laws to follow (regardless of which ones we agree with) then this doesn't help society.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: "Ignoring red lights is 100% safe"
Postby human909 » Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:49 am
I will object to anybody whose actions threatens or endangers another persons life whether they are breaking a law or not. I won't object to somebody harmlessly breaking a law. Eg, Going through a red light at a empty intersection.martinjs wrote:I suggest until YOU start obeying the law you STOP complaining a motorist who don't obey the law.
This applies equally to motorists and cyclists.
As said previously I certainly almost always will stop for red lights. However on occasion I do go through them. I am happy to argue the point. Less about defending myself, more about objecting to continuous condemnation of other red light jumpers I see around here.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.