There's fine, and then there's Zipp

frb_bike
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: There's fine, and then there's Zipp

Postby frb_bike » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:25 pm

greyhoundtom wrote:Just maybe there should be a “used by date” in relation to distance travelled on CF wheels, at which point they should be subject to being X rayed for fractures or other faults.


Wheel manufacturers would love that. Used by date = more sales :)

But given the severity of the consequences of a wheel falling apart, there is not much other choice but to have one methinks.

User avatar
AUbicycles
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11753
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: There's fine, and then there's Zipp

Postby AUbicycles » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:41 pm

winstonw wrote:Just browsing the Zipp website.
Who would have thunk it?


All fine, not indicating flex rather as I understand really the physical fit of the wheel with certain frames.

User avatar
warthog1
Posts: 5911
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm

Re: There's fine, and then there's Zipp

Postby warthog1 » Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:06 pm

AUbicycles wrote:
All fine, not indicating flex rather as I understand really the physical fit of the wheel with certain frames.


A couple of blokes in my old club had trouble fitting sub9 disc wheels in their tt frames. P3 and trinity I think they were.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], find_bruce, Noviss, PCL138