Bike sizes

eece
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:38 am

Bike sizes

Postby eece » Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:41 pm

When it comes to mountain bikes, is it best to have 2-3 inches space between the top tube and you with both feet on the ground? I'm 5'6, with 28" inseam, and as I measured my current bike, the frame is 15"... how does the frame size relate to your inseam size? Sorry, I'm learning here :oops:

Nobody
Posts: 7727
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Bike sizes

Postby Nobody » Sun Dec 30, 2012 10:53 pm

Stand over height doesn't really matter that much. It's the reach from the saddle to the handlebars which is more important. This is mainly defined by the frame's effective top tube length (ETT) - which is the horizontal measure from the head tube intersecting the top tube, to the seatpost - and the stem (which is easily changed).

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22823
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Bike sizes

Postby il padrone » Sun Dec 30, 2012 11:10 pm

Standover height matters.... for your goolies! On a normal road bike 2" is about the normal minimum for comfort. Yes, you can get away with even less, by always stopping and hooking just one leg down with the other leg drooped over the top tube, but it's inelegant, awkward at times and not so handy.

On a MTB the standover needs to be even greater as you may be forced to stop on a steep descent. When this happens your reach to the ground is very much at an angle forwards and thus much greater. Typically standover heights of 5"-7" are not uncommon at all. If your MTB is to be used for trail riding in mountainous terrain you really need the extra clearance if at all possible. For shorter riders it sometimes is just not possible, but best to be aware of this need when choosing a bike.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
bychosis
Posts: 4341
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie

Re: Bike sizes

Postby bychosis » Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:27 am

stand over height matters a bit, but still the most important part of the fit is top tube length, and also seat-pedal length. If you aim purely for standover height the other two could be out and you wont fit the bike while riding it, but you'll look great whilst standing over the top tube at the end of a ride.

Most proper moutain bikes should provide you with decent standover if you have the right frame size
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22823
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Bike sizes

Postby il padrone » Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:35 am

bychosis wrote:but still the most important part of the fit is top tube length, and also seat-pedal length.

I don't think I said anything to the contrary of this :| . The OP's question was about what the best standover for a MTB is and I'm suggesting that 2"-3" is inadequate.
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
Mulger bill
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 28370
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Sunbury Vic

Re: Bike sizes

Postby Mulger bill » Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:30 am

Spare a thought for us short legged, long torso'd riders. I bought my TranceX on the basis of TT length as I don't like leaning back to ride a bike. The TT just brushes the lads doing the standover test. My hardtail is long AND low 8)
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Comedian, Rioli2Gunstall