
(sorry not sure how to resize it...) Sort of fixed...
Latest Reviews and Articles
Postby LM324 » Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:17 pm
Postby wombatK » Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:41 am
fatdudeonabike wrote:I like the disclaimer about the possibility of dead heat rules applying on the question of whether he'll admit doping...
Not quite sure how that can end in a dead heat...
Postby find_bruce » Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:19 am
Postby AUbicycles » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:13 pm
Postby fatdudeonabike » Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:17 pm
AUbicycles wrote:On the betting, it would be interesting seeing the odds for standing ovations (though I understand it is a private interview and there is no audience). Also, how often these words are used: hero, survivor, inspiration, believe, chance.
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:47 pm
fatdudeonabike wrote:AUbicycles wrote:On the betting, it would be interesting seeing the odds for standing ovations (though I understand it is a private interview and there is no audience). Also, how often these words are used: hero, survivor, inspiration, believe, chance.
You forgot miracle! You can't forget miracle!
Thats a perfectly justifiable way to justify beating a field full of drug cheats when you're clean!
Postby greyhoundtom » Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:20 pm
Postby Sydguy » Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:33 pm
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:47 pm
Postby AUbicycles » Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:48 pm
greyhoundtom wrote:I'm still finding it difficult to get my head around why LA would agree to a so called no holds barred interview, as I simply can’t see what he could possibly gain by doing it.
Postby gabrielle260 » Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:12 am
Postby Fresh » Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:44 pm
Postby greyhoundtom » Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:13 pm
Armstrong met with USADA officials recently to explore a "pathway to redemption,"
Postby Mustang » Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:52 pm
Postby fatdudeonabike » Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:28 pm
Mustang wrote:Aired the same time as in the US ,midday on Friday, on the Discovery Channel.
Postby sogood » Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:34 pm
greyhoundtom wrote:I'm still finding it difficult to get my head around why LA would agree to a so called no holds barred interview, as I simply can’t see what he could possibly gain by doing it.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby AUbicycles » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:03 pm
Postby darkelf921 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:16 pm
AUbicycles wrote:I have published an opinion piece on BNA - raises a few points not discussed here.
Will you be able to forgive Lance Armstrong?
Postby AUbicycles » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:22 pm
Postby AUbicycles » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:29 am
Postby gretaboy » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:46 am
Postby MichaelB » Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:48 am
Postby AUbicycles » Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:47 pm
Postby Red Rider » Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:19 pm
AUbicycles wrote:I have thinking about the media buildup around the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky scandal a bit as this builds up and wouldn't be suprised if it fizzles out like that - however Clinton (Bill) was able to redeem himself in the public eye and is very much admired despite wrong-doings. Armstrong certainly wants a piece of that.
Postby Rhubarb » Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:35 pm
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: Milpool
The largest cycling discussion forum in Australia for all things bike; from new riders to seasoned bike nuts, the Australian Cycling Forums are a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.