Changes caused by Armostong's admission

User avatar
goneriding
Posts: 2243
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Strathfield

Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby goneriding » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:55 pm

In light of the Armstrong interviews there will be some changes made in unusual places. I came across this one from the Manly Library...

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/books/8203464/Library-moves-Armstrong-books-to-fiction-section

Anyone come across any others?
Image

User avatar
hannos
Posts: 4088
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:18 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby hannos » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:08 pm

That turned out to be a prank.
2010 BMC SLC01

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22485
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby il padrone » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:16 pm

Movie rights.

Don't know whether this'll be classed as a doco, or fictional drama :P
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

boss
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:58 pm

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby boss » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:29 pm

I've found that cycling forums have become fixated on Lance Armstrong to the point where every second topic is about Lance Armstrong's doping, Lance Armstrong's admission, whether or not Lance Armstrong should have gone on Oprah, if Lance Armstrong's apology was enough, whether Lance Armstrong should be allowed to ride, etc etc etc.

Not to mention every website and blog running extended pieces on Lance Armstrong.

And the news constantly rehashing tidbits from the Lance Armstrong vs Oprah Winfrey interview.

Ehhhhhh.

I personally thought it was good he admitted it. After that, who cares. He's just another guy from that generation who doped.

Ehhhhh.

User avatar
il padrone
Posts: 22485
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
Location: Heading for home.

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby il padrone » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:38 pm

+1

Lance who ??
Mandatory helmet law?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."

User avatar
sogood
Posts: 17152
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Sydney AU
Contact:

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby sogood » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:25 pm

I think it's all because of the strong arm tactics used on this subject!
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple :)
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.

User avatar
rkelsen
Posts: 4402
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:41 pm

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby rkelsen » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:32 pm

boss wrote:And the news constantly rehashing tidbits from the Lance Armstrong vs Oprah Winfrey interview.

It was a 2.5 hour long interview... in fact you could say that it was like an interview on steroids...

User avatar
g-boaf
Posts: 6782
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: Changes caused by Armostong's admission

Postby g-boaf » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:13 pm

I'm still wondering, Lance who? At least it diverted attention away from mandatory Lycra discussions.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alrsv1, DG1984, silentC