Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
- The Walrus
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:37 pm
- Location: Mullumbimby Creek NSW
Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby The Walrus » Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:49 pm
I'm starting to learn that it takes a lot of tweaking to get your ride exactly as you want it. So I'm now considering making a few adjustments aimed at comfort before considering any changes.
It feels like I'm stretching too far forward on the hoods and feels better further back. And my MTB seat is a delight. The roadie feels like I'm sitting on a spike after 20 k's!
- KenGS
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Rosanna, Victoria
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby KenGS » Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:35 am
After my bike fit a few years back the only change I made was to turn the stem over as I improved my core strength.
Helmets! Bells! Rego!
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21325
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby g-boaf » Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:25 am
If you are comfortable, you can ride easily for a long time. IMO - comfortable is also faster over the long run.
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby wombatK » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:37 am
you a relaxed or comfort fit, rather than an aggressive racing position unless you ask for
that. The main difference in the aggressive fit is how low the handlebars are positioned
relative to your seat - to minimize your profile and wind resistance at the expense of
comfort. That is mostly achieved by reducing the stack height of the headstem, and if done
in the neatest way, the excess height of the fork is cut off and is not easily reversible.
Have a talk to the LBS you bought from and see if they can help. Extenders can be
fitted if you've got a stem that's too low, but I don't know how well they work.
Cheers
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
- clackers
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 10:48 am
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby clackers » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:42 am
And getting used to it is what you need to do, Walrus. But it happens. My wife has just stopped complaining after going from a hybrid to a drop bar touring bike.The Walrus wrote:I'm still getting used to riding a road bike compared to years of MTB's...when you get a proper bike fit, as I did, are they fitting the bike to you for optimum performance rather than simple comfort?
The fitting will optimize your reach and knee placement, but, yes, it fundamentally can't match the comfort of a "sit up and beg" position.
You will have to let your lower back strengthen naturally or even better do core muscle exercises, because you shouldn't be taking all that new weight forward with a deathgrip on the bars, your trunk should be self-supporting with only a light resting of the hands.
In return, your new position is aerodynamic and will get you to your destination faster, especially against a headwind. You can ride for hours at a pace that would be exhausting for someone catching air with their chest in an upright position.
If your speeds are always going to be below 30 kmh a flat bar roadie is all you need!
Conversely, those looking to spend a lot of time above 40 kmh (such as triathletes) stretch even further when they buy time trial bars.
- DoogleDave
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:56 pm
- Location: Taylors Hill, Victoria
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby DoogleDave » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:34 am
I agree that a bike shop should do the fit based on your age, flexibility, aims and also the style of bike you have purchased (which the LBS should have sold you based on the same information).wombatK wrote:A good bike fit shop will take into account your age, flexibility and aims. They'll tend to give
you a relaxed or comfort fit, rather than an aggressive racing position unless you ask for
that. The main difference in the aggressive fit is how low the handlebars are positioned
relative to your seat - to minimize your profile and wind resistance at the expense of
comfort. That is mostly achieved by reducing the stack height of the headstem, and if done
in the neatest way, the excess height of the fork is cut off and is not easily reversible.
Have a talk to the LBS you bought from and see if they can help. Extenders can be
fitted if you've got a stem that's too low, but I don't know how well they work.
Cheers
If you bought an aggressive racing bike, they would likely set you up to cater more for performance and if you bout a touring bike it would be setup around comfort - though both should still be setup with comfort of the rider in mind.
As your body adapts and gets stronger (particularly your core strength), your position on the bike may be able to cope with a more aggressive setup which in turn means a follow-up fitting to tweak things to suit accordingly. A bike fit isn't necassarily a set & forget thing, but can be a dynamic thing that changes over time as your flexibility, strength and aims all change.
Dave
- The Walrus
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:37 pm
- Location: Mullumbimby Creek NSW
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby The Walrus » Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:18 am
I'm not out to race or set any new world records here, but comfort is crucial if I'm going to use it. I wont be going at or over 40 all the time, unless its all down hillclackers wrote:
If your speeds are always going to be below 30 kmh a flat bar roadie is all you need!
Conversely, those looking to spend a lot of time above 40 kmh (such as triathletes) stretch even further when they buy time trial bars.
I've considered changing the bars but the cost is a it much for something that might not work out for me, plus I do see how the different hand positions on drops can be useful. I have dropped the seat a touch and rotated the bars so that the drops are higher/nearer to see how that feels.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby sogood » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:15 am
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- The Walrus
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:37 pm
- Location: Mullumbimby Creek NSW
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby The Walrus » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:00 pm
I dont want to get low to the bar! I like being upright on the hoods which I guess is due to years of flat bars! That low or lowest position feels like my arms/hands are over stretching to get onto the hoods...its uncomfortable on my spine, it feels like I'm forcing my body weight down onto the saddle, creating discomfort in the ass as well!sogood wrote:Quite simply, there's no performance without comfort. And comfort is much dependent on your flexibility, core strength and whether you are used to a road bike. In other words, your comfort fit will change within the first year of road bike ownership as you get used to the position. In terms of "optimal performance", the biggie really is in how low you can get on the bar ie. Aero profile. Others are pretty much unchanged to your flat bar bike.
I have reasonable core strength but it needs improving. I do yoga and pilates regularly as I had a spinal fusion 5 years ago and fingers crossed had no issues since!
I'm considering going to another LBS to get their take on it but for now I'm going to start tweaking simple things that can make a difference.
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:30 pm
- Location: East Sydney
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby whitey » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:44 pm
That sounds like a poor bike fit to me, when I got properly fitted there was a lot of focus on ensuring ability to comfortably reach bars, hoods and drops. Before the fit riding in the drops felt similar to what you describe. Now it feels comfortable and natural. being able to get into the drops can be handy descending as it lowers centre of gravity and increases leverage on brakes. Also good to be ale to change positions on long rides to assist with fatigueThe Walrus wrote: I dont want to get low to the bar! I like being upright on the hoods which I guess is due to years of flat bars! That low or lowest position feels like my arms/hands are over stretching to get onto the hoods...its uncomfortable on my spine, it feels like I'm forcing my body weight down onto the saddle, creating discomfort in the ass as well!
Might be worth seeing a professional fitter rather than a LBS (unless the have a professional fitter) could be money well spent with your medical history. FWIW I got a fit when I bought the bike at the LBS, it never felt right. Was set up with a slammed stem and too agressive, felt unstable on hoods. Went and got a proper fit from a recognised fitter 12 months ago and have done 8000K since in comfort.I'm considering going to another LBS to get their take on it but for now I'm going to start tweaking simple things that can make a difference.
The Bike Fitter made some big changes, went from a slammed stem to having `4cm of spacers and a flipped stem. Why the LBS wanted me folded like a pretzel I will never know.
The bike fit seemed expensive at the time but looking back on it was the best money spent on cycling. And relative to the total investment in cycling gear (bike, shoes, helmet, lights, kit, shoes etc) was <15% of the total.
Longer reply than I anticipated, hope it helps.
- simonn
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:46 am
- Location: Sydney
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby simonn » Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:53 pm
Oh well, there goes what I was going to add .The Walrus wrote:I do yoga and pilates regularly...
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby sogood » Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:41 pm
I don't think these are contradictory requirements at the amateur level. Given that you have been a cyclist and have what sounded like good flexibility, then the first step is to fit you up for the saddle. This step is independent of your ultimate preferred position and bikes (except a TT bike I guess). Once that's done, how high or how low you want to go on the bar is determined independently. Start high and then try to move lower over a period of time. There'll be a sweet spot for you somewhere.The Walrus wrote:I dont want to get low to the bar! I like being upright on the hoods...
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby toolonglegs » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:37 pm
TT bikes are not comfy but boy they preform .sogood wrote:Quite simply, there's no performance without comfort.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby sogood » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:47 pm
Comfy within a context.toolonglegs wrote:TT bikes are not comfy but boy they preform .
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby toolonglegs » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:01 pm
I would go so far as to say the higher the performance,the lower the comfort. Everything is compromise.
But... that doesn't mean set up becomes more complicated... if we are talking about a standard road bike, then your saddle height and position once set up to your bb properly will not change much at all. But your bar position will / can as you change depending on many things. After all you can ride two hours solid on the tops or drops... hugely different positions but your saddle position remains the same.
- wombatK
- Posts: 5612
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Yagoona, AU
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby wombatK » Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:24 pm
hands are placed on the bars. The aim should be to adjust the seat (foreward and aft) and then possibly
headstem length/position (e.g. by turning upside down, or getting longer/shorter one), until your balance is
neutral - i.e. little if any weight on the bars.
The way to test of neutral balance is to see if you can pedal (on flat ground, or safer still on a trainer), with
your hands 5 mm above the bars. If you find yourself falling forward onto the bars, you've got to move your weight
backwards (e.g. seat back on rails). If you can hold your hands (say) 1 cm higher without falling forward, you might
need to move your weight forward (e.g. seat forward on rails).
This is somewhat dependent on your core strength, which as others have said, will improve with more km's on the
bike. But that's no reason not to tweak it now, and untweak again maybe 6 months or so down the track when
you feel your core strength is handling it better.
Cheers
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be us -Jerry Garcia
- The Walrus
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:37 pm
- Location: Mullumbimby Creek NSW
Re: Fitted for opt performance or comfort?
Postby The Walrus » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:38 am
I've been thinking about the bike fit I had. They are a very professional LBS and have a fitting room with computers, cameras and plumb bobs etc etc. They are a part of the Specialized BG Fit program but I think that was close to $500. The fit I had seemed very thorough and it took at least 45 minutes but I reckon the problem may have been is that I simply didn't know how any of it would feel when out pedalling!
Its all very well the guy saying "how does that feel" but being new to a roadie I just went with what felt 'ok', but now it feels quite different!
Maybe I need a fit tweak so I'm going to go back to the LBS based on my findings, theories and the valuable info from you guys and see what they say.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: grt046
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.