SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?)
- biker jk
- Posts: 7002
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby biker jk » Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:41 pm
Where are the signs telling walkers to keep left, not walk two or three abreast across the path, not to stop in the middle of the path, etc?
- simonn
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:46 am
- Location: Sydney
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby simonn » Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:44 pm
There are plenty of those signs on the track Jane Caro was on.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21352
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby g-boaf » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:14 pm
They need to put them on separate paths where possible. Where I ride there is room for a separate path, they should do it - because some peds are getting very un-sharing in the way they use the existing track (it's even reasonably wide)! I'm not the only one to suggest that.
While some bike riders go a bit too fast**, most ride to the conditions and behave in a sharing manner. But the pedestrians on the other hand, more of them are being quite dangerous in the way they use the path.
** just for some research - I had a go at the east-bound 4km strava segment KOM on my local track (the KOM holder shall remain anonymous). I clocked just over 38km/h average speed, good enough for a 4th place - on a stinking hot day with not a single person in sight. 1st place? 44km/h average speed, and I hope the track was closed off when that was achieved. If there were pedestrians or other cyclists about, it'd be too risky. At 38, that was fast enough, can't imagine doing 44 average!
I prefer to go for a hill instead, do repeats of that. Two car lanes wide and never any pedestrians - only a few other cyclists and the occasional snake, fox or goanna. There you can go as fast as you want without bother, although the sign says 40km/h speed limit - which I'm doing uphill. That's fun, it is safe and it's a good workout.
While some bike riders go a bit too fast**, most ride to the conditions and behave in a sharing manner. But the pedestrians on the other hand, more of them are being quite dangerous in the way they use the path.
** just for some research - I had a go at the east-bound 4km strava segment KOM on my local track (the KOM holder shall remain anonymous). I clocked just over 38km/h average speed, good enough for a 4th place - on a stinking hot day with not a single person in sight. 1st place? 44km/h average speed, and I hope the track was closed off when that was achieved. If there were pedestrians or other cyclists about, it'd be too risky. At 38, that was fast enough, can't imagine doing 44 average!
I prefer to go for a hill instead, do repeats of that. Two car lanes wide and never any pedestrians - only a few other cyclists and the occasional snake, fox or goanna. There you can go as fast as you want without bother, although the sign says 40km/h speed limit - which I'm doing uphill. That's fun, it is safe and it's a good workout.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby find_bruce » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:23 pm
Hate to be the bearer of bad news gboaf, but the bay run has significant sections of separated paths- ie trees, plants & other physical barriers.
Does not cure the problem - idiots, whether on foot, car or bike, still find a way to endanger others
Does not cure the problem - idiots, whether on foot, car or bike, still find a way to endanger others
It doesn't get easier, you just get slower
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21352
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby g-boaf » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:34 pm
Well, they tried! Ultimately, bike riders can ride more safely by doing no more than 10km/h on shared paths, according to some people. This is what Scruby wanted I think. How many here would agree that this is the right thing to do?
I bet even the most vocal proponents of slower riding wouldn't go that slowly! it's so slow it is silly, but I've had to do it some times when a group just won't move.
I bet even the most vocal proponents of slower riding wouldn't go that slowly! it's so slow it is silly, but I've had to do it some times when a group just won't move.
-
- Posts: 10322
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:10 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby Nobody » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:53 pm
Agree. At SOP they have a 10Km/h section at the Armoury. It is very hard to do 10 through there and I often find myself closer to 20. Yet I'm usually one of the slowest riders.g-boaf wrote:I bet even the most vocal proponents of slower riding wouldn't go that slowly! it's so slow it is silly, but I've had to do it some times when a group just won't move.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21352
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby g-boaf » Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:11 pm
20 is quite a good speed, easy enough to stop. But if there are kids around, you need to be prepared for anything - which I'm sure you are. Even slower speed offs can can hurt.
I haven't been along to the area you mention, might head along there one time when I'm back on the bike again. I'm a bit of an M7 addict.
I haven't been along to the area you mention, might head along there one time when I'm back on the bike again. I'm a bit of an M7 addict.
Last edited by g-boaf on Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby Xplora » Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:48 pm
That section is next to a busy play area which often has little kids on or near the path. Most new riders to the path would have no idea, plus there are few regulars to those ropes, it's mostly irregular visitors.
Speed limits are meaningless. The number of mad kids on the road proves it. Inattention hurts at 10kmh as well. If you want to amble without concentrating, there are better places like footpaths.
Speed limits are meaningless. The number of mad kids on the road proves it. Inattention hurts at 10kmh as well. If you want to amble without concentrating, there are better places like footpaths.
-
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:23 pm
Re: SMH - Jane Caro - Opinion Piece (Cooks River Cycle Path?
Postby diggler » Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:01 am
Yes some people would be pissed off no matter what speed you do. You can't legislate against stupidity.simonn wrote:I agree with you, however, some peds are going to be pissed off at whatever speed you travel. The Gore Hill path is mostly two cycle lanes + one pedestrian lane. There are some very badly designed parts where is changes to shared path on {in,de}clines.diggler wrote:What exactly are you guys doing on these bike paths? I slow down whenever I see a pedestrian. The Cooks River bike path is sign posted to have pedestrian priority. I can't speak for the Gore Hill path. I don't think it is reasonable to travel at maximum speed with merely a warning bell to fulfil all your obligations.
The idea that you should ring your bell for peds is ridiculous. At peak hours on this path it would sound like a rendition of jingle bells. And, depending on how you define "slow" it could be a long ride for you.
The simple thing is for everyone to stay in their lanes and if they want to stop, move off the path. Easy, and at the very least just polite.
And yes some pedestrians are idiots wandering on the wrong side of the path, 2 abreast or all other forms of stupidity.
At the end of the day, it is a shared path with pedestrian priority (at least the Cooks River path is).
You can't expect to ride as fast as you want. If there are blind corners, then of course you should be slow enough to avoid something around the corner. You can't blame an accident on bad design. I blame the idiot riding too fast for the conditions.
Agree that the bell should be used if necessary, not as a matter of course.
Motorists hate cyclists and cyclists hate the motorists and the pedestrians hate the bikers and everybody hates the trucks.
Jump to
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
Brought to you by Bicycles Network Australia | © 1999 - 2024 | Powered by phpBB ®
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.