Equipment and On Road Behaviour, Laws and Rules. Cycling Promotion and Advocacy
by sogood » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:47 am
il padrone wrote:Trouble is, if you build infrastructure and don't also do something about changing rules and entrenched attitudes that work against cycling (like the attitudes of some primary school administrators) you get this: 
That's not the kind of infrastructure you just showed! Partitioned path!!!
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by Forum Ads » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:56 am
-
Forum Ads
-
by Xplora » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:56 am
-
Xplora
-
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:33 pm
by il padrone » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:10 am
sogood wrote:That's not the kind of infrastructure you just showed! Partitioned path!!!
Oh truly  Stop picking nits. Who cares <edited by mod> ?? And there are plenty of unused segregated paths about in peak hour too. It does not change the message. Unused infrastructure is poor infrastructure 'Build it and they will come' only works if there are minimal forces working against it..... ie. the school's rule is a big deterrent.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
-

il padrone
-
- Posts: 15048
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Palermo, mafia-capital..... and on to Sardegna.
by wizdofaus » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:13 am
Xplora wrote:sogood, a cyclist doesn't NEED more than that. In fact, that would be awesome. I normally deal with a lot less.
"NEED" != "reasonably feel comfortable with". I can completely understand a less experienced cyclist (especially if female) deciding riding is just too dangerous along a road where cars blithely cross over into bike lanes like that. Somewhat irrelevant to the discussion at hand as I'm talking about children under 10, and I would fully expect them to only ride on footpaths and dedicated bike paths.
Last edited by wizdofaus on Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
wizdofaus
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am
- Location: Kensington, Melbourne, VIC
-
by il padrone » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:15 am
BTW the "this" I was raising as a problem in the photo is the empty bike lane. Motorists all look at that and see wasted space.
Empty segregated paths are a bad look as well.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
-

il padrone
-
- Posts: 15048
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Palermo, mafia-capital..... and on to Sardegna.
by sogood » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:33 am
Xplora wrote:No Stopping in the School Zone hours. SURELY SOMEONE WILL THINK OF THE CHILDREN  sogood, a cyclist doesn't NEED more than that. In fact, that would be awesome. I normally deal with a lot less.
No Stopping? You are optimistic on the parents of present day. These days, so many parents ignore existing traffic rules in front of the school, we are seeing some form of reminder every few months from the school. Just hopeless. At the end of the day, citizen ethics is another factor in this multi-factorial problem. Can we change it? More nanny state techniques? Shock and horrors!
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by sogood » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:35 am
il padrone wrote:Oh truly  Stop picking nits. Who gives a **** ??
Urrr... It's BNA Forum. Where did you think you were posting? 
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by hannos » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:36 am
sogood wrote:No Stopping? You are optimistic on the parents of present day. These days, so many parents ignore existing traffic rules in front of the school, we are seeing some form of reminder every few months from the school. Just hopeless. At the end of the day, citizen ethics is another factor in this multi-factorial problem. Can we change it? More nanny state techniques? Shock and horrors!
Yep! Rangers blitzing school areas during peak drop off times. They really only need to take a picture of the offending vehicle for a fine to be issued... 
2010 BMC SLC01
-

hannos
-
- Posts: 3798
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: Sydney
by il padrone » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:40 am
Yep. The power of the hip-pocket nerve will do the trick soon enough. If the authorities can be bothered.
It's one big reason why much fewer people drive cars in European cities.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
-

il padrone
-
- Posts: 15048
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Palermo, mafia-capital..... and on to Sardegna.
by sogood » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:56 am
il padrone wrote:Yep. The power of the hip-pocket nerve will do the trick soon enough. If the authorities can be bothered.
Sob stories generated by the media and other self-interested parties will soon put a stop to that. Wonderful society and the authorities will move onto other "more important" things! 
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by human909 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:30 pm
I was catching two buses through the CBD when I was SEVEN YEARS OLD. Likewise, riding a bicycle to school for a young child is not a crazily dangerous thing. But Australian nanny state says otherwise. 
-
human909
-
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:48 am
by sogood » Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:51 pm
human909 wrote:I was catching two buses through the CBD when I was SEVEN YEARS OLD. Likewise, riding a bicycle to school for a young child is not a crazily dangerous thing.
Name the year. And I was catching 3 buses when I was SEVEN years old. 
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by wizdofaus » Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:18 pm
sogood wrote:human909 wrote:I was catching two buses through the CBD when I was SEVEN YEARS OLD. Likewise, riding a bicycle to school for a young child is not a crazily dangerous thing.
Name the year. And I was catching 3 buses when I was SEVEN years old. 
Luxury...I used to dream of being able to catch 3 buses...
-
wizdofaus
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am
- Location: Kensington, Melbourne, VIC
-
by Xplora » Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:54 pm
wizdofaus wrote:sogood wrote:human909 wrote:I was catching two buses through the CBD when I was SEVEN YEARS OLD. Likewise, riding a bicycle to school for a young child is not a crazily dangerous thing.
Name the year. And I was catching 3 buses when I was SEVEN years old. 
Luxury...I used to dream of being able to catch 3 buses...
Back in my day we'd wake up an hour before we'd gone to bed, clean the bottom of the lake and drain it to clean it again otherwise our father would kill us on pain of death.... cruel... but fair...
-
Xplora
-
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:33 pm
by sogood » Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:09 pm
Xplora wrote:Back in my day we'd wake up an hour before we'd gone to bed, clean the bottom of the lake and drain it to clean it again otherwise our father would kill us on pain of death.... cruel... but fair...
Ok, you win! 
Bianchi, Ridley, Montague, GT, Garmin and All things Apple 
-

sogood
-
- Posts: 16046
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
by simonn » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:33 pm
Xplora wrote:wizdofaus wrote:sogood wrote:Name the year. And I was catching 3 buses when I was SEVEN years old. 
Luxury...I used to dream of being able to catch 3 buses...
Back in my day we'd wake up an hour before we'd gone to bed, clean the bottom of the lake and drain it to clean it again otherwise our father would kill us on pain of death.... cruel... but fair...
You 'ad a lake?!?! Luxury. We 'ad t'make do with puddle in t'middle of t'road.
"My bicycle masters boardwalk and quagmire with aplomb. Those that doubt me... suck THUMB by choice."

-

simonn
-
- Posts: 3046
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:46 am
- Location: Sydney
by Mulger bill » Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:58 am
 You 'ad road?
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 22805
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by Mulger bill » Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:27 pm
Ah tole yer we was 'appy 
...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic. London Boy 29/12/2011
-

Mulger bill
- Super Mod

-
- Posts: 22805
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
by TigerFilly » Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:06 pm
Apart from the fact that I don't think the school has any right to tell you how you convey your child to school... I think grade 4 or 5 is about right for riding to school unaccompanied. Before that kids' peripheral vision isn't fully developed. I've been riding my kids to school when possible for the last four years or so, so my son was only in year 1 when he started riding to school, but I was with them, and he rode on the footpath at that age ( which has its own dangers, but I would ride on the road just ahead of him so could see any cars reversing out of driveways). Last year from about age 9.5 he started riding alone - ie even on days when I needed to drive and drop his little sister, he would ride, leaving home 5 mins before me and meeting at school. He is only able to do that because I've spent 4 years teaching him how to ride on the road. A couple of times I've had friends of my son's over after school and arranged for them to bring their bikes and ride with us, and both kids were a danger to themselves and everyone else with no idea how to ride safely in public. Tell you what really doesn't help - stupid drivers who think they are being helpful and waving kids on when the car has right of way. I've spent a long time drilling my kids on the road rules, it's not kind to wave them through, it's confusing.
-
TigerFilly
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:47 pm
- Location: Adelaide
by il padrone » Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:46 pm
TigerFilly wrote:Last year from about age 9.5 he started riding alone - ie even on days when I needed to drive and drop his little sister, he would ride, leaving home 5 mins before me and meeting at school. He is only able to do that because I've spent 4 years teaching him how to ride on the road. A couple of times I've had friends of my son's over after school and arranged for them to bring their bikes and ride with us, and both kids were a danger to themselves and everyone else with no idea how to ride safely in public. Tell you what really doesn't help - stupid drivers who think they are being helpful and waving kids on when the car has right of way. I've spent a long time drilling my kids on the road rules, it's not kind to wave them through, it's confusing.
+1 to all this.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
-

il padrone
-
- Posts: 15048
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Palermo, mafia-capital..... and on to Sardegna.
by Xplora » Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:58 pm
I do find it interesting how parents expect their kids to learn skills when they don't teach them, and don't give them a chance to put it into practice. You would have to assume your kid would be USELESS riding to school unless you'd spent time teaching them how to manage the road. The school can't enforce good parenting. Somewhat sad that these parents somehow expect their kids to learn how to drive without any understanding of the road (if they don't ride a bike or walk to school). I don't consider myself some old school tough nut but I rode bikes as a kid and I walked to primary school for years.
Good on you Tiger.
-
Xplora
-
- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:33 pm
Return to Cycling Safety and Advocacy
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
|
|